Channel
@pitupikart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
29subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002196030544 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pitupikart |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 20 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pitupikart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 29 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:11 | 30 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 68.4% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2024 to 26 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
СОХРАНЯЕМ ЧЕК В PDF ПРЯМО В ББ БЕЗ СТОРОННИХ ПРИЛОЖЕНИЙ!!! 1)Заходим в Bybit. 2)В поисковике вводим «Ордеры» и заходим туда. 3)Выбираем «купить крипту» 4)Далее Р2Р->и выбираем ВСЕ ОРДЕРА 5)Выбираем из списка тот ордер,в котором находится наш PDF 6)Открываем PDF,зажимаем его и нажимаем на «Поделиться». 7)Кидаете этот PDF куда вам надо и не заморачиваетесь https://t.me/fz161fzz
Братья, кому так в личку пишут якобы с одолжением, что научат чему-то, сразу шлите куда подальше)
🤣2
Что там по классике ?)
❤2🔥2
Какие-то чеки липовые, не?
Тг канал живет что ли у меня?
❤3
Акк у рат но 🤝
❤3🔥1
😢 Можно ли потерять деньги на «Белом треугольнике»? Очевидно, где находятся «легкие деньги», там и лежат большие проблемы. В нашем случае это мошенники. И сейчас я расскажу про одну из схем, которой эти самые мошенники пользуются. Но кто бы был я, если бы я не рассказал, как же не потерять деньги внутри всего этого дерьма. Поехали... К сожалению, на днях наш сотрудник по неопытности попался на удочку скамеров. Сум…
Нынешние реалии😆
❤1
Когда говорил дропу, что не будешь крутить чернуху через его карту
Video message, posted without a caption
Новая система обработки аппеляции: Суть в том, что нужно загрузить PDF-файл либо запись истории операции, которая должна подтверить, что платеж был/не был. Но сегодня случилась такая ситуация, что мой контрагент покупая у меня USDT, не перевел деньги, а аппеляция завершилась в его сторону, т е USDT перешли к нему, а деньги я не получил 🤷🏻♂️ Вывод: Чеки, скрины, видео я кидал именно в чат, чтобы поддержка увидела…
❤1
А у вас как связь называется, пацаны?
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pitupikart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pitupikart named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Муртазалиев | P2P” (@pitupikart), 29 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitupikart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.