Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Журнал «Питомцы»

Channel

Журнал «Питомцы»

@pitomcy

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,894subscribers

+276 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002124828463
TypeChannel
Usernames@pitomcy @pitomcy_vetandlife
DescriptionОфициальный аккаунт журнала «Питомцы» — территория осознанной заботы Сайт: https://pitomcy.press/ Бот обратной связи: @pitomcy_R_bot Реклама: 📲 @ad_vetandlife
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/pitomcy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@pitomcy/7327 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC@ViZHuvizh/177928 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC1.002 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ViZHuvizh5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.4 hours@ViZHuvizh (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 76 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,6186,9426,7806 August 2026 — 6,618 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,652 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,679 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,679 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,676 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,699 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,756 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,748 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,751 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,772 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,791 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,784 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,798 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,939 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,919 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,903 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,932 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,921 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,921 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,925 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,911 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,909 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,889 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,870 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,873 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,856 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,859 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,854 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,846 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,861 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,862 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,846 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,841 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,837 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,843 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,835 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,831 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,820 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,839 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,927 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,942 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,923 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,914 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,911 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,905 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,893 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,894 subscribers6,8946 August 202610 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 96 days, net +276. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,569–6,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 09:406,894+1
10 Nov 2026, 04:196,893-12
7 Nov 2026, 07:466,905-6
6 Nov 2026, 12:176,911-3
4 Nov 2026, 11:296,914-9
3 Nov 2026, 12:186,923-19
1 Nov 2026, 17:496,942+15
31 Oct 2026, 19:096,927+88
29 Oct 2026, 22:486,839+19
29 Oct 2026, 04:306,820-11
26 Oct 2026, 16:076,831-4
26 Oct 2026, 00:466,835-8
23 Oct 2026, 14:116,843+6
22 Oct 2026, 17:066,837-4
20 Oct 2026, 13:196,841-5
19 Oct 2026, 08:296,846-16
17 Oct 2026, 03:556,862+1
16 Oct 2026, 15:286,861+15
14 Oct 2026, 12:286,846-8
13 Oct 2026, 13:556,854first reading

Engagement

98 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.03%
avg views ÷ 6,894 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 98 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held98 (4 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total13,056
Reactions total701
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 07:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,440
Videos
≈1,180
Links
≈3,570

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
28m 28s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,760 reactions across 98 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤69839.7%
🔥27415.6%
😁21612.3%
👍20311.5%
🤗794.49%
🏆714.03%
🥰472.67%
😍412.33%
💯251.42%
😱211.19%
👀150.852%
🙏150.852%
🤝150.852%
👌110.625%
👏90.511%
🤔80.455%
🤯60.341%
❤‍🔥20.114%
👎20.114%
😢20.114%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 98 of the 98 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 47 posts held from the last 30 days (4.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC185 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🗓14–15 ноября: афиша на выходные для любителей животных Мы подготовили для вас афишу, и здесь каждый найдет что-то для себя. Но главное событие этих выходных, конечно, — грандиозная выставка «Евразия 2026» от РКФ в «Крокус Экспо». 🔸Ждем вас на стенде журнала «Питомцы». Обязательно приходите познакомиться, пообщаться и узнать больше о нашем издании. Будем очень рады видеть каждого! ◻️ Мы в Max | ВК | Дзен | ТГ

❤4🔥3👍1

13 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC203 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

🤫Не поверите, у кого в гостях побывал журнал «Питомцы» Мы отправились в одно из самых волшебных мест, где каждый день выступают настоящие звезды. У них есть свой режим, репетиции и, конечно, обожание публики. А еще...эти артисты пушистые. Догадались, о ком речь? Если нет — скорее включайте рилс, там дадим подсказку. А совсем скоро мы опубликуем полное видео. Берем вас с собой в гости! ◻️ Мы в Max | ВК | Дзен | ТГ

❤4🔥3👍1

13 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC189 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Здоровье российских питомцев оценили в 63,8 балла из 100 📊Как вы думаете, насколько здоровы наши хвостики? Аналитический центр НАФИ и Royal Canin впервые рассчитали специальный индекс здоровья питомцев — единую шкалу от 0 до 100, которая объединяет медицинские показатели и повседневные привычки ухода. Итоговый результат по России — 63,8 балла. Причем собаки обогнали кошек (68,6 против 59 баллов). Эта разница объясн…

😱4❤2👀1

13 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

У вас есть только 50 рублей, чтобы собрать кота: 1. Послушный — 70 р. 2. Спокойный — 60 р. 3. Убирает за собой в лотке — 250 р. 4. Будит вас в 3 ночи — 30 р. 5. Делает внезапный кусь — 20 р. ◻️ Мы в Max | ВК | Дзен | ТГ

😁7❤4🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC275 views47 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🤔Кто станет питомцем недели? Друзья, мы объявляли конкурс на самого отважного борца с бытовой техникой — и вы показали, что реакция может быть совершенно разной! Кто-то с рычанием встает на защиту дома, кто-то предпочитает спокойно спать, а некоторые и вовсе пытаются починить технику. Встречайте 4 участников, которые поборются за звание «Питомца недели». Теперь все решаете вы! Как голосовать? Голосовать могут толь…

❤27👍10🤗4🏆2🔥2🥰2

12 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC285 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🙀Диван в клочья, а кот смотрит невинными глазами? Не спешите ругаться Это не месть за забытую вкусняшку и не вредность. Кошки точат когти, чтобы метить территорию, стачивать верхний слой когтя и снимать стресс. Это заложено природой, поэтому кричать, брызгать водой и тыкать носом в обивку абсолютно бесполезно — питомец просто начнет делать это втайне, когда вы не видите. Что реально поможет спасти мебель? ▫️Когтет…

👍5❤3🤝1

12 Nov 2026, 11:55 UTC250 views9 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🦎В премии «Лапуреат года» мы ждем заявки не только от владельцев кошек и собак! У нас есть специальная номинация для владельцев «нестандартных» любимцев — «Экзотический питомец года». Она создана для всех, чьи питомцы не относятся к привычным кошкам и собакам. Птицы, грызуны, рептилии, амфибии, рыбы, членистоногие и другие нетипичные для большинства людей животные — мы ждем вас! 🟧Здесь ваш главный козырь — это сам …

❤4🔥3😍2

12 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC264 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🐭12 ноября — День декоративных мышей и крыс в США! Слышали про такой? Для многих слово «крыса» ассоциируется с подвалами и вредителями. Но этот праздник создан как раз для того, чтобы разрушить эти стереотипы и рассказать о тех, кто становится настоящими членами семьи. Чем же так удивительны декоративные крысы и мыши? ▫️Они невероятно умные. Крысы по уровню интеллекта не уступают собакам: они отзываются на имя, мо…

❤11👍3🥰3

12 Nov 2026, 06:35 UTC213 views20 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Когда твой хозяин тревожник и тебе постоянно нужно быть веселым, а то поедешь к ветеринару... ◻️ Мы в Max | ВК | Дзен | ТГ

❤11😁8💯1

11 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC263 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

⏳Успейте принять участие в конкурсе «Питомец недели»! Мы ищем самого отважного борца с бытовой техникой. Для нас пылесос или фен — просто приборы, а для вашего хвостика — злобные монстры, которых нужно победить или от которых нужно героически сбежать на шкаф! 👀Присылайте в комментарии фото своих «защитников» при встрече с техникой и рассказывайте, как они реагируют на шум. Самого смелого объявим «Питомцем недели» …

👍6❤3🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC271 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🥳Теперь нас можно найти не только на Wildberries! Отличные новости для всех, кто любит читать наш журнал в печатном виде (и собирает коллекцию!). Мы расширяем географию, и теперь заказать наши выпуски можно еще и на Ozon. Чтобы вы точно знали, что положить в корзину, коротко рассказываем о каждом номере: 🔸Четвертый выпуск Посвящен героям. Вы узнаете о животных, помогавших приближать Победу в Великой Отечественной …

❤5👍3🔥3

11 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC312 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣4️⃣ «Рак — победим!»: как не упустить онкологию у питомца и при чем здесь мода на породу Слово «онкология» для владельцев домашних животных до сих пор звучит как приговор. Но с этим страшным диагнозом можно и нужно бороться. Это ежедневно доказывает Евгений Корнюшенков — кандидат биологических наук, главный врач ветеринарного онкологического научного центра «Биоконтроль». 📹Как не упустить онкологию на ранн…

👍7❤3🤝3

Showing the 12 most recent of 98 posts we hold for @pitomcy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

🩷А какая у вас кошка?

  1. Породистая32%
  2. Беспородная74%
  3. Породистая и очень редкая (покажу в комментариях)3%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 98 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ВетИС.Новости
@vetrfru · 27,502
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журнал «Питомцы»” (@pitomcy), 6,894 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitomcy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.