Channel
@pitchers_branding
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
132subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002759468137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pitchers_branding |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 20 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pitchers_branding |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 132 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 134 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 134 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 20 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
150 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 16.0% | |
| 🦄 | 14 | 9.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 7.33% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 6.00% | |
| 🎄 | 5 | 3.33% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.667% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.667% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Друзья, с наступающим Новым годом 🎄 Всего несколько часов осталось до окончания 2025 года. Он был разный — наполнен новыми знакомствами, яркими событиями, где-то сложный, где-то радостный, но точно живой, трансформирующий. Год, который запомнится. Спасибо всем, кто был рядом с нами в этом году. Старым и новым друзьям. Тем, кто читал, писал, поддерживал, спорил, молча наблюдал или просто оставался на связи Пусть в …
❤13🎄5❤🔥3🤮1
В субботу наш креативный директор Сергей Соловьёв выступил на масштабном лектории Dprofile с темой «Эмоции — новая еда». Он рассказал наш кейс о бренде грузинского ресторана с эмоциональным сервисом, где важна не только кухня, но и то, какие чувства получает гость: от улыбки официанта до ощущения, что его ждали. Больше всего порадовал отклик аудитории. Люди слушали с интересом, задавали вопросы и обсуждали услышанно…
❤14🔥9❤🔥8
Сегодня меня потрогали Pitchers. Это бренд-бюро из Саратова с самой калорийной компетенцией брендинга в HoReCa. Супер-люди с любовью к городу, устроили нам экскурсию и пригласили в грузинский ресторан для которого они создали концепцию, стратегию и дизайн. Результат работы: все 256 мест полностью посажены. Круто.
❤16🔥13😍9
Друзья, когда вы выбираете ресторан или кафе — вы идёте за едой или за совокупностью ощущений? За тем самым настроением, вниманием, атмосферой, которая делает место «своим»? Мы уверены — если у вас есть любимое кафе, куда вы возвращаетесь не ради капучино, а ради состояния «здесь мне хорошо» — значит, вас влечёт сила бренда. Бренд решает не меньше, чем вкус блюда. В чём сила бренда? 1. Еда — это только часть опыта. …
👍8🦄7❤5
Два дня со студией SLOY: стратегия, единение и много креативности Мы верим: бренд комплексная история, которая строится на смыслах, позиционировании, стратегии и людях. С нашими друзьями из студии SLOY мы провели два очень разных, но одинаково крутых дня. День первый — стратегическая сессия Разбирали позиционирование студии, нашли точки роста, построили бизнес-модель и подошли к этапу конструирования ценностного пр…
👍15❤7🦄3
Только ленивый еще не сказал про ребрендинг Subway, который отныне превратился в Subjoy. Но пройти мимо мы не можем. В прошлом месяце занесло нас в Subway быстро находу перекусить. Перекусить получилось, а вот атмосфера, сервис и вкус оказались на уровне "обнять и плакать". В общем, грустно нам стало от регионального Subway, особенно когда на промо-экранах показывают ролики с белоснежными современными интерьерами, г…
❤5🦄4👍2🔥2👏1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @pitchers_branding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 894,896 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PITCHERS” (@pitchers_branding), 132 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitchers_branding.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.