Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for pishgoo_jeen

Channel

pishgoo_jeen

@pishgoo_jen

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,954subscribers

+392 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003724201472
TypeChannel
Username@pishgoo_jen
Descriptionاین جادو نیست/پیشگویی از طریق ریاضت و مکاشفه/جن و ماوراء طبیعه/پژوهشگر متافیزیک،عالم ماورا و جن / 👇مشاوره و سفارش مواکیل رحمانی👇 @malaek_movakel
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pishgoo_jen

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

16,400 average views per post against 13,954 subscribers — an engagement rate of 117.3%. Across the 8,059 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.69% and 17.3%, with a median of 8.65%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 July 2026 18 August 2026)
Posts measured31 of 31 published in the window (0 exact, 31 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled507,460
Mature posts only119.8% over 30 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers13,954 measured 17 August 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 8,059 channels · p10 1.58% · p25 3.69% · p50 8.65% · p75 17.3% · p90 29.7%
Position in cohort99.690th percentile · 13.6× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.03% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

13,54713,95513,7517 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,562 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,547 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,570 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,844 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,934 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,950 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,951 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,954 subscribers13,9547 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,486–14,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:0513,954-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:3813,955+4
15 Aug 2026, 08:5513,951+1
13 Aug 2026, 23:3813,950+16
12 Aug 2026, 14:2513,934+30
11 Aug 2026, 11:4313,904+60
10 Aug 2026, 08:3013,844+274
9 Aug 2026, 11:0113,570+23
8 Aug 2026, 08:2813,547-15
7 Aug 2026, 11:5213,562no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:1613,562first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
117.3%
avg views ÷ 13,954 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,400
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held31 (19 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total507,460
Reactions total12,590
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
143
Videos
30
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12,590 reactions across 31 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,98747.6%
👍2,84822.6%
😢6715.33%
😱5664.50%
😭3642.89%
💔3212.55%
👏2091.66%
👎2061.64%
🤔2001.59%
😨1611.28%
🙏1391.10%
💩1160.921%
🤬990.786%
😁910.723%
🔥830.659%
🕊750.596%
🤣650.516%
😐310.246%
💯300.238%
👀270.214%
31 further kinds3012.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈5,930 views355 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌پرچم سفید ترامپ مدعی است تنها راه پایان جنگ تسلیم است ⭕️قبل از آمدن ترامپ در کاخ ریاست جمهوری بیان کردیم ترامپ به دنبال تسلیم بی قید و شرط است و شروطش در واقع پایین کشیدن پرچم جمهوری اسلامی است پایان هسته‌ای پایان موشکی پایان نیابتی صلح با اسرائیل و اکنون پایان سپاه ⭕️یک نکته در میان خواسته های ترامپ که تسلیم شروط ترامپ نشد و در نهایت کشته و حذف گردیدند در سه مرحله مخالفین حذف شدند به این امید که انان که در راس ق

👍20085👏33😍10😢6👎5💋5🎉4

15 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈8,510 views467 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌۸۰ درصد مخالف نظام ایران نتانیاهو در مصاحبه ای مدعی شد ۸۰ درصد از ملت ایران مخالف حکومت هستند و حکومت همچنان ۲۰ درصد طرفدار دارد که عدد زیادی است ⭕️ما به درست و غلط بودن این گزارش و آمار کاری نداریم برای ما پلن یهود در مقابله با حامیان حکومت است انکه مخالف است نیازی ضد شدن ندارد ⭕️تنها راهی که به اجماع امریکا و اسرائیل رسیده است اقتصاد است ، اقتصاد مانند استخوان در گلو می ماند بدین خاطر پس از زدن نیمی از منابع ان

259👍134🤷16🤬15😢11💔8👎7🕊7

13 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈12,500 views144 reactionsread 18 August 2026

و عمل تربیع بخورات🌹

106👏24👎7🤩4🖕2🥰1

13 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC≈12,200 views239 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🌹با قبولی طاعات و عزاداری ها و حلول ماه ربیع الاول 🌹 ⚜عمل تربیع ماه اول قمری ⚜ برای سفارش دهندگان مواکیل از بنده 🔅و آغاز ساعات سعد و فراخ 🔅 ریپلای نمایید

177👍39🖕9👎5🤔5🏆3🕊1

13 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈12,400 views312 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌بازی اقتصادی وزیر خزانه داری امریکا اسکات بسنت روز اول ورود اسکات به مسند خزانه داری یک پیام در ایکس منتشر کرد صندق را کوچک کنیم منظورش کم کردن بدهی دولت بود که چندین گزینه را در جهان دنبال می کنند تصاحب نفت بهترین گزینه است از ونزولا تا کلمبیا و کوبا و حتی ایران بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز به سود اقتصاد آمریکاست و حتی اگر باب المندب را هم ببندند باز سود بیشتری عاید امریکا خواهد شد انگار بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز نقشه ی بر

184👍76🤬15👎12🍾9🤯6🖕5💯2

13 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC≈9,920 views503 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌بمب کثیف انچه که سالها بیان داشتیم و داریم استفاده از اورانیوم در بمب کثیف است ساخت بمب اتم نیاز به تکنولوژی هست که از ان فاصله داریم ⭕️اما بمب رادیو اکتیو که سالها دم از ان می زدیم تولیدی بسیار آسانی دارد و آمریکا و اسرائیل به همین دلیل بدنبال خروج ان هستند ⭕️موضع حکومت مشخص است در صورت جنگ کثیف از بمب کثیف استفاده می کنیم این هشدار زمانی بیان میشود که حکومت با انتصاب جدید و جابجایی نیروهای نظامی در سطح کشور خود

💔248😢79😭6846👍19😱14🔥8🤬7

11 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC≈10,800 views421 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌پست پیشگویی رها سازی خودرو ها همانطور که در پست ها و استوری ها بیان کردیم ما شاهد رها سازی خودرو ها در خیابان‌ها و کوچه ها و در منازل و پارکینگ خواهیم بود ⭕️پس از بمباران پتروشیمی و مخازن سوخت کشور و همچنین محاصره ی دریایی فشار اولیه بر مصرف سوخت خودروها در حال اجرا است بزودی سهیمه ها قطره چکانی خواهد شد و شاهد خلوتی خیابان ها خواهید بود ⭕️اما مهمترین پلن اینده ی یهود ، بمباران بزرگترین پتروشیمی و تولید کننده ی

233👍82😱36💩20💔16😐11😁7🎉5

10 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC≈13,800 views507 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌مسلح سازی مخالفین همانطور که در پست اخرین تظاهرات قبل از تظاهرات ۱۸ دی بیان کردم پس از اخرین تظاهرات دیگر تظاهرات مسالمت‌آمیز نخواهیم داشت ⭕️یکی از پلن های یهود رساندن اسلحه به مخالفین در ایران بود و توسط کردها و همچنین از طریق خوزستان و از سمت چابهار اسلحه وارد ایران شده است و در نبود ایست بازرسی و خالی بودن گلوگاه های باری ، از ماموران در جنگ چهل روزه و بخصوص زدن ایست بازرسی های ورودی و عبوری کامیون های اسلحه در

259👍85💔47😨42😱28😐18👎8👏8

9 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC≈16,400 views410 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌وقت کشی در مذاکرات ⭕️ایران عمدا از سیاست وقت کشی در مذاکرات استفاده می کند و تا می تواند و تا جایی که جا دارد مذاکرات تنگه را کش می دهد ❌️دلیل اصلی این کار گمراه کردن در موضوع اصلی مذاکرات یعنی هسته ای و موشکی و نیابتی و غیره است ⭕️ایران به خوبی می داند اگر مذاکرات تنگه به نتیجه و توافق برسد باید بر سر موضوع هسته‌ای و موشکی، که جنگ بر ان اغاز شد مذاکره کند و بسیار سخت و دشوار خواهد بود ⭕️لذا حکومت تصمیم گرفته ا

👍210106🤣40💩32🤔6🐳4🕊4🔥3

8 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈12,800 views444 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📌توافق بر تنگه ی هرمز حملات امریکا و اسرائیل با موضوع هسته‌ای و موشکی بود مذاکرات هم بر موضوع هسته‌ای و موشکی و نیابتی بود ❌️تا اینکه تنگه هرمز بسته شد و مذاکرات از هسته‌ای و موشکی به موضوع تنگه تمرکز پیدا کرد ⭕️امریکا محاصره اقتصادی را به جهت بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز ایجاد کرد بمباران بنادر و جزایر را به جهت بسته بودن تنگه ی هرمز انجام داد اکنون باز در حال مذاکره هستند ‼️شما فکر می‌کنید برنامه اشان بازگشایی تنگه ی

249👍123😢23👎15🥱9😁8👌7👏6

7 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC≈14,100 views167 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚜بسیاری از سوالات و نیازهای شخصی شما از حل و باز نمودن تا رشد و ترقی شما در پیج دوم ما میباشد..⚜ 🎁پیجی که مملو از اطلاعات حیرت آور و خاصی است که جایی ندیده و نخواهید یافت که حاصل چندین سال ریاضت و مکاشفه و علوم خاص است.. ❌حال که دوباره در دسترس قرار گرفته با تورق پیج از آن بهره برده و برای مخاطبین خود نیز ارسال نمایید 📌تا هم موجب رشد سواد جمعی همگان گردد و هم قوتی برای بنده در جهت ادامه قوی تر پیشگو 🔻لینک اینستا

115👍37👏5🏆3👌3😍3👎1

6 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈14,100 views414 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

📌در گندم خود شدیم!! شعاری که ایت الله خمینی گفت باید در گندم خود کفا شویم ⭕️و آقایان هم همت گذاردند در خودکفایی که هرگز به ان نرسیدند و به دروغ گفتند خود کفا شدند اما در عمل بلایی سر محیط زیست آوردند که اکنون محتاج غرب به گندم باشیم که البته و صد البته موضوع محتاج شدن به غرب نیست بلکه پلنی برای روزهای آینده است ⭕️معصومه ی ابتکار دختر جوانی که در زمان انقلاب از سفارت آمریکا بالا رفت و به مدت ۱۲ سال ریس سازمان مح

212👍122😢47👏10🙊7👎6🤬6🖕3

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @pishgoo_jen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 369,668 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“pishgoo_jeen” (@pishgoo_jen), 13,954 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pishgoo_jen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.