Channel
@pisatel_club
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003119062976 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pisatel_club |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pisatel_club |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 47 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 45 | +18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 27 | -42 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 69 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 69 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 34 | 44.7% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 18.4% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Мрачный мир, темный свет Он не горит, он мерцает на дне Там, в дали, в конце коридора Ты ведь знаешь, что здесь мира нет. Только время, идущее вспять Раз - щелчок И ты во тьме, да, опять Ты стоишь, пытаясь разглядеть И понять Что хотела от тебя жизнь И что ты не смог ей отдать." #записки
💋3🔥1
Итоги небольшого интерактива:: 🥇1 место - @MayaOnik 🥈2 место - @katee2012 🥉3 место - @SnickersLate спасибо всем участникам! все они получают 1 спойлер к любой части моих книг, которые я дам им в этом боте - @MyWarriorsBooks_bot
💋2🔥1
#репост
😈😈 писатель или поэт? 👓Тогда время блеснуть своим талантом на нашей сцене.💀 📖«Для того, чтобы избежать критики, надо ничего не делать, ничего не говорить и никем не быть» — 🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔 Грин Хаббарт.🤩 Занавес поднимается, и на сцене... оказываетесь 🅰️🅰️❗ 🌟Готовы к 🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔🆔? Тогда пришлите свою работу и получите честную критику — мы любим смелых авторов.🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩Навигация 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
🎲 Тест ««Тест на знание сюжета моего произведения»» Сᴇйчᴀᴄ ʍы ᴨᴩᴏʙᴇᴩиʍ, нᴀᴄᴋᴏᴧьᴋᴏ хᴏᴩᴏɯᴏ ʙы ɜнᴀᴇᴛᴇ ᴄюжᴇᴛ ʍᴏᴇй будущᴇй ᴛᴩиᴧᴏᴦии. 🖊 5 вопросов · ⏱ 15 сек
Я решила подготовить вам небольшой тест на знание сюжета моей книги, и сегодня, в конце дня мы выявим самого внимательного читателя! Ссылка ниже:: #интерактив
Я предлагаю все таки сделать набор в админы. А точнее, в администрацию я буду искать писателей, художников и других творческих личностей. Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
私 ˖𓂃 ࣪ ˖ ⌞📔 ⌝ 𖥻💫⊹ ࣪ ⌞📔 ⌝ ⤿ 𝑧𝑍 𝒢𝜚 ꭷ ˊ ୨୧-Союз-꒰ 𖥻 ꒱ — Сᴇᴦᴏдня ᴏдин иɜ ᴄᴀʍых ʙᴀжных днᴇй ʙ нᴀɯᴇʍ ᴛʙᴏᴩчᴇᴄᴋᴏʍ ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴩᴀнᴄᴛʙᴇ - ʍы ɜᴀᴋᴧючᴀᴇʍ ᴄᴏюɜ ᴄ ɯиᴋᴀᴩныʍ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴏʍ @lysia_masterskaya ! —— "Тᴇᴨᴇᴩь ʍы нᴇ ᴏдинᴏᴋи. Рᴀɜнᴏᴇ дᴇᴧᴏ - ᴏбщий ᴩᴇɜуᴧьᴛᴀᴛ." 私 ˖𓂃 ࣪ ˖ ⌞📔 ⌝ 𖥻💫⊹ ࣪ ⌞📔 ⌝ ⤿ 𝑧𝑍 𝒢𝜚 ꭷ ˊ
💋3
«...Каждому из призрачных силуэтов, сидевших на поляне, было дано слово. Первым заговорил Восход, основатель племени Рассвета, с довольно вольным и пылким нравом. Его янтарные глаза ярко светились, словно сейчас была ночь, а ясный взор был устремлен на огненно рыжего лидера...» Пламенные Истоки, глава 2 #спойлер
💋3❤1
Мне было немного лень монтировать, поэтому только это, по мм2 ролик смонтирую позже #сходка
🔥3💋2
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥1
— ну вот и кончился наш сеанс в animal hospital. Чуть позже смонтирую видео, круто поиграли! Всем спасибо, скоро пойдём в мм2! P.S - я сдохла чтобы идти с вами в мм2, а остальные всё ещё играют
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pisatel_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Я предлагаю все таки сделать набор в админы. А точнее, в администрацию я буду искать писателей, художников и других творческих личностей. Делаем?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pisatel_club named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𖥻꒰уᴦᴏᴧᴏᴋ ᴨиᴄᴀᴛᴇᴧя꒱” (@pisatel_club), 47 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pisatel_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.