6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,357–1,433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 09:36
1,424
+12
17 Aug 2026, 10:48
1,412
+3
13 Aug 2026, 15:27
1,409
+4
10 Aug 2026, 07:44
1,405
+39
7 Aug 2026, 11:05
1,366
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:32
1,368
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
34.7%
avg views ÷ 1,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
494
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
9,887
Reactions total
645
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
645 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
415
64.3%
💔
141
21.9%
👍
29
4.50%
😭
14
2.17%
👌
10
1.55%
🙏
10
1.55%
🔥
9
1.40%
👏
7
1.09%
👀
3
0.465%
💯
3
0.465%
🥰
2
0.31%
🤔
1
0.155%
🤷
1
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
چه جمع عزیزی
منزل حمید مصدق، اواخر دهه ۶۰
از راست: علی بهبهانی، داریوش ارجمند، محمد حقوقی، (پشت سر) لاله مصدق، میهن بهرامی، سیمین بهبهانی، مهدی اخوان ثالث، حمید مصدق، (پشت سر) محمدعلی سپانلو، هوشنگ حسامی و همسرش ثریا صدر دانش، (نشسته روی زمین) امید بهبهانی.
#پیرایه_یغمایی
t.me/pirayeh_y
يعنی ذوق کتابخوانی مردم ما در سال 1355 -دو سال قبل از انقلاب- این بوده؟
کتاب مفاتیح الجنان بوده که باید 500 هزار نسخه به فروش برسد؟
حيرت!
#پیرایه_یغمایی
t.me/pirayeh_y
(پلنگ نامه) رو ادامه میدیم با این شعر
راستش من این تصویرو چند سال پیش دیدم و دلم خواست جای اون بچه باشم، و بعد این شعرو نوشتم
آهای .. پلنگ خالدار
مسافری تو انگار
منم ميام باتو ... آی
منو روی دوشت بذار
ببر ، ببر ، از اينجا
ببر ، به آسمونا
ببر به بزم زهره
ببر به شهر رؤيا
پلنگ نازنينم
دلزده از زمينم
اينجا طنين مرگه
خسته از اين طنينم
اينجا همه ش دروغه
قصه ها بی فروغه
بالا که رفتی کشکه
پايين بيايی دوغه
پلنگ خط مخا…
از کنار این تصوير به سادگی رد نشويد
- و حالا چرا؟
پلنگ سیاه از نوادر روزگار است. بیش از صد سال بودکه وجود و حضور پلنگ سیاه در آفریقا به صورت علمی ثبت نشده بود.
تا اينکه سال 2020 عکاسی به نام ( Will Burrard-Lucas) بعد از کمین کردن يک سال تمام و تحمل صبر و انتظار بسیار توانست این پلنگ را در کنیا (آفريقا) ببیند و چندین عکس را از او بگيرد.
اين عکس در رده ی عکس های بی نظير جهان و برنده ی مسابقه ی عکاسی سونی شناخته شده…
■یاد میگیری
کمکم ياد میگيری تفاوتِ ظريفِ گرفتنِ يک دست
و زنجير کردنِ يک روح را
کمکم ياد میگيری که عشق همخوابگی نيست
و همراهی اطمينانِ خاطر
کمکم ياد میگيری که بوسهها قراردادی نیستند
و هديهها معنای وعده ندارند.
و کمکم ياد میگيری که شکستهایت را
سربلند و با چشمانی باز بپذيری
با ظرافتی زنانه، نه اندوهی کودکانه
و ياد میگيری که تمام راههایت را امروز بسازی
زيرا زمين فردا برای طرحها بسیار نامشخص است
و آي…
تهران ، سال 1315
مراسم گشایش مدرسه دخترانه «انوشيروان دادگر»
گروه موسیقی در سمت چپ تصوير قابل درنگ است
و همچنین تابلوهای پندار نيک، گفتار نيک، کردار نيک بر دیوار
و باز همچنين خوش پوشی زنان که کلاه مناسب بر سر دارند و اگر چه لباسشان پیدا نیست، اما باید کت و دامن باشد که معمول آن زمان بوده
#پیرایه_یغمایی
t.me/pirayeh_y
آيا می دانستید که مری اندرسون (Mary Anderson)،آمريکايی ، در سال ۱۹۰۳ میلادی اولین برفپاککن را اختراع کرد و به ثبت رسانید؟
جرقه ی این اختراع از آنجا زده شد که مری اندرسون در سفر زمستانی خود به نیویورک متوجه شد راننده تراموا مجبور است برای پاک کردن برف و باران، پيوسته شیشه جلو را باز کند یا از خودرو پیاده شود و این کار باعث سرد شدن فضای داخل میشود.
طرح اوليه ی او یک اهروم دستی از داخل خود رو بود که به يک بازوی فن…
غرض نقشی است کز ما باز ماند،
که هستی را نمی بینم بقايی
.
روزها می آيند و می روند و تنها نقشی از زیبایی ها و مهربانی از ما باقی می ماند.
دو هفته ای که برمن گذشت بسیار تلخ و ناگوار بود، اندوه سنگينی بر من آوار شد که هنوز هم آوار است، اما حضور دوستان نازنينی چون شمايان، با مهربی دريغ ومهربانی سرشار و پیام ها و کامنت های همدلانه و گرم آنقدر زیبا بود که توانستم آن را تاب بیاورم .
این روزها همواره یاد گفته ی مادرم افتادم …
این فراخوانی است برای ادای دین به اسماعیل یغمایی، باستانشناسی که پای میراث وطن ایستاد:
«اسماعیل یغمایی.»
همه با هم جمعه نهم امرداد ۱۴۰۵ در باغ نگارستان در ساعت ۱۷:۳۰ جمع میشویم تا یاد مردی را زنده نگهداریم که همواره از تاریخ این مرز و بوم دفاع کرد و با سختجانی جلوی بسیاری از اقدامات تخریبگرانه علیه محوطههای باستانی ایستاد.
عکس: حسین کریمزاده
@karimzadehpix
پوستر: فاطمه رضایی
@zorvvvan an
ساخت ویدیو: سام چ…
❤25💔5🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pirayeh_y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 253,311 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@pirayeh_y named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@karimzadehpix named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@zorvvvan named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پيرايه يغمايی” (@pirayeh_y), 1,424 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pirayeh_y.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.