Channel
@piquancy_style
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
641subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001273449648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @piquancy_style |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/piquancy_style |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 641 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 643 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 646 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 646 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
157 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 75 | 47.8% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 28.0% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 3.82% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 2.55% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.27% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.637% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.637% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера зашла с дочкой в тц и случайно углядела этот костюмчик. Померила его, второй так и остался висеть на крючке. Красиво. Но не хочу. От этой мысли стало немного грустно. Кажется, у меня пропал интерес к прежнему способу радовать себя. Красивые вещи уже не дают прежнего эмоционально подъема. Возможно взросление. Возможно переоценка ценностей. А может я просто перестала искать в покупках то, что теперь ищу совсем в…
👍6😢4❤2
Рогов показывает как носить костюм не скучно ) Рубашка + берите любой платок в цветочек и на бедрах пиджак за рукава завязывает)) Прям захотелось в офис) 🔥 - повторим ❤️ - повторяй сама
❤18🔥5
С праздником, мои красотки)) Желаю, чтобы цветы были не только сегодня. Чтобы подарки были не только по праздникам. Чтобы внимание было не из вежливости, а потому что невозможно по-другому. Чтобы вас баловали, Вами восхищались, заботились ❤️ А самое главное, чтобы вы от себя кайфовали ))
❤24🔥5🥰4
Находка по погоде. Чтобы не потерять варежки при расчистке сугробов и выкапывании транспортных средств ювелирные мастера сделали антипотеряшку. Золотая цепь для варежек инкрустированная бриллиантами. А мне в детстве резинку для трусов к варежкам пришивали. Я тем же грешила, пока детки были совсем маленькие) 🔥- нам надо ❤️- у нас резинка для трусов
❤23🔥4🤩1😱1
Здесь прячется один из самых сильных страхов перед обращением к стилисту: «А вдруг мне предложат что-то вообще не про меня?» И, если честно, я тоже часто задаюсь вопросом, почему начанают строить стиль человека, не изучив его самого? Ведь в том, что человек уже выбирает, в том, как ему нравится себя чувствовать, есть огромное количество подсказок. Видно же, что этой девушке важны комфорт и мягкость. Она выбирает я…
🔥17❤4❤🔥2
Оцените работу стилиста? Что думаете? 🔥 - вау крутое преображение ❤️ - тоже так хочу 🤔 - сомнительно, но не пойму что
🤔20🔥6❤4
Уже больше трех лет занимаюсь пилатесом с тренером. И если вы когда-нибудь пробовали, вы знаете: пилатес похож на йогу тем, что он медленный. Все движения микро. И тело не всегда успевает прогреться полностью. Задумываясь о том, как сейчас выглядеть актуально, собрано и при этом не мерзнуть в зале составила свои рекомендации: Гетры Их можно надеть поверх носков или заправить в них незауженные штаны. Тепло, балетно…
🔥7
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @piquancy_style. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 179,099 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пикантности стиля” (@piquancy_style), 641 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/piquancy_style.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.