Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 10 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 154 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @nvxu. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
108 measurements spanning 96 days, net -9,552. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,472–54,890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 108
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 00:45
43,905
-113
11 Nov 2026, 14:21
44,018
-74
10 Nov 2026, 17:01
44,092
-38
9 Nov 2026, 20:31
44,130
-71
9 Nov 2026, 06:45
44,201
-34
8 Nov 2026, 12:47
44,235
-122
7 Nov 2026, 21:05
44,357
-22
7 Nov 2026, 08:58
44,379
-49
6 Nov 2026, 20:21
44,428
-62
6 Nov 2026, 06:06
44,490
-33
5 Nov 2026, 16:59
44,523
-54
5 Nov 2026, 04:16
44,577
-63
4 Nov 2026, 13:59
44,640
-47
4 Nov 2026, 06:01
44,687
-20
3 Nov 2026, 16:29
44,707
-17
3 Nov 2026, 06:50
44,724
-79
2 Nov 2026, 14:06
44,803
-9
2 Nov 2026, 07:25
44,812
-27
1 Nov 2026, 11:58
44,839
-4
1 Nov 2026, 09:44
44,843
first reading
Engagement
159 posts held, back to 30 August 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 189 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 159 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Showing the 12 most recent of 159 posts we hold for @piqi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@piqi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@bosspdpd named in 2 posts, 18 August 2026 – 19 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
免费代理公益频道 @gydl6 · 161,158 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 16 August 2026
币安担保 @PRON 供需广告 50U/条 @pron · 196,487 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
📢利币供需20U💥限时10u一条 @xqlql · 111,828 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
路易供需付费广告10U【限时7U发布】认准@Keep @Lvsvip · 100,003 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 15 August 2026
仙宫供需50U一条 【限时10U发布】充10条送5条 @XG_6666 · 80,935 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 15 August 2026
清影10u供需👮🏻♂️每天稳定引流中🧧 @qy665 · 157,782 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 14 August 2026
🔥黑客供需7U一条联系客服发布 @HKGXQ · 101,492 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 15 August 2026
白金付费广告50u【限时20u一条】@aikun @aikun · 38,768 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 19 August 2026
苹果担保供需(100u) @pgdbgx · 82,447 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 16 August 2026
🪩TG代理高速网-免费公益高速代理节点VPN @gaosuwang · 195,266 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 14 August 2026
VPN加速器.免费代理.高速节点 @ndsss · 162,905 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 17 August 2026
MTP公益免费高速代理频道 @ProxyMTProting · 73,512 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥长安赌神供需10u/70口 买一送一” (@piqi), 43,905 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/piqi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.