Channel name was changed to «Pip Zone 💎»

Channel
Pip Zone 💎
@pip_zone
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,143subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001600497880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pip_zone |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 14 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pip_zone |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 2,143 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 2,144 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 2,148 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 2,149 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 2,151 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 2,152 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 2,152 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 14 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12m 42s
- Average length
- 3m 11s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,230 reactions across 15 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 554 | 45.0% | |
| 👍 | 306 | 24.9% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 6.83% | |
| 😢 | 62 | 5.04% | |
| 🕊 | 57 | 4.63% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 2.68% | |
| 🤔 | 26 | 2.11% | |
| 🫡 | 20 | 1.63% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 1.46% | |
| 🤩 | 12 | 0.976% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 0.65% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 0.569% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 0.569% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 0.569% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.569% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.407% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.244% | |
| 4 further kinds | 5 | 0.407% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2022 to 31 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
❤65👍8🔥4👏3🥰3🤔1😭1
جاوبت على كل الاسئلة اللي تخص موضوع النسخ و البوت الخلاصة: تاريخ الإطلاق: لم يتم تحديده بعد اقل مبلغ ايداع: لم يتم تحديده بعد البروكر: براحتكم, لكن انصحكم تنسخو معايا على نفس البروكر عشان تجيكم نتائج مطابقة IC Markets المنصة: cTrader استراتيجية البوت: لا يمكن الإفصاح حالياً سعر البوت: غير معروض للبيع قمت بإختبار البوت مرّة و تحسينه مرة اخرى الاختبار الاول: الايداع 3 الاف —— النتيجة بعد سنة = 97 الف (الصورة رقم واحد) …
👍36❤25🫡16🕊6🔥4😭2
Live stream finished (1 hour)
Live stream started
سأقوم بالإجابة على جميع اسئلتكم, اسألوني من هنا @Tarwada فقط ننتظر 5 دقائق حتى اكتمال العدد
❤19😡2🔥1🤬1
حابين اعمل اتصال الساعة ١٢ بتوقيت مكة اجاوب على استفساراتكم؟ اتصال تيليقرام حيكون على هذي القناة
👍59❤14🔥5🤬2🆒2
شرح لما سبق
❤79🔥11🙏8👍6👏5🫡4😡1
السلام عليكم حاب اعطيكم تحديث بخصوص الاكاديمية و جميع خدماتها 1- التعليم: اصبح طاقم العمل 3 اشخاص على كتابة الدروس ولكن المونتاج و التصوير سوف يكون من تقديمي 2- روبوت نسخ الصفقات: الان مرفق لكم صورتين بتاريخ امس الصورة الاولى للبوت في المرحلة الاولى من التحسين: بداية الرصيد 3000 دولار نهاية الرصيد اكثر من 97,000 دولار مدة الاختبار كانت سنة الصورة الثانية بعد المرحلة الثانية للتحسين: بداية الرصيد 3000 نهاية ال…
❤56🔥17👍15❤🔥11🤩2👌1😡1
السلام عليكم, حاب اخذ رأيكم بموضوع. بالنسبة للأمثلة على الصفقات. تحبو انها تكون مشروحة على:
- cTrader26%
- MetaTrader74%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍29❤🔥14❤7👏4😢4😡3🔥2🌚1
هل يتوفر لديك جهاز لوحي (تابلت) او لابتوب ؟
- نعم67%
- لا27%
- لا ولكن استطيع الشراء6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍37🤔25😢14❤10😁1
ارجو منكم الاجابة على الإستفتاء القادم
👍39🔥10🐳7👨💻3🍌2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pip_zone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
السلام عليكم, حاب اخذ رأيكم بموضوع. بالنسبة للأمثلة على الصفقات. تحبو انها تكون مشروحة على:
- cTrader26%
- MetaTrader74%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
هل يتوفر لديك جهاز لوحي (تابلت) او لابتوب ؟
- نعم67%
- لا27%
- لا ولكن استطيع الشراء6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2022 to 31 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 523,835 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pip Zone 💎” (@pip_zone), 2,143 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pip_zone.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.