[In reply to Jose Adrian Ursua] Missing gems fill up this and resend Wallet: 0x8b9d90cc7bf3316cd9cde6d4839fc83b138f370cba69505bcda Gems before: 560 Gems after:0
Channel
pinoy support group - gems lost
@pinoybfcsupportlostgems
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
23subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610506457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pinoybfcsupportlostgems |
| Created | Between 1 November 2021 and 4 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pinoybfcsupportlostgems |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 23 | +1 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 22 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 23 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 24 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 November 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Missing gems fill up this and resend Wallet: 0xcEB0609c1061a661a9cC8a6056478 482c6F080cf Gems before: 1190 Gems after: 0
Wallet address 0x9f8007a779Eb3289ecE8b4b8791C2985a8923817 Gems before 2424 Gems after 24
/report Loss Gems report Wallet: 0x9958cAe8BdAf1B76eAEd7F9b2e7bcA62982b7d76 Gems before: 6900+ Gems after: 4000
/report wallet address:0x5ade2a71cce737c613392c96049f68c5f5378794 total gems: 620 total gems lost: 1,860
/report wallet address:0x5ade2a71cce737c613392c96049f68c5f5378794 total gems: 620 total gems lost: 1,860
[Forwarded from CATmiming] Loss Gems Report/Plz fill up accordingly Wallet:0x4Da57D175C49620643aF7A216aFbbcA6D00D42bE Gems Before:5k plus Gems After:4000
Wallet address: 0xf1041fDaB3860f0DE061FF78978906324Bc8895e Total gems: 5096 Total gems lost: 1000-1500 (cant remember exact amt)
/report lost gem wallet address: 0x33E92956D8D2202f71695F60850700bA60c0D93a total gems: 5000+ total gems lost: 1000+
wallet address:0xaf06cEDc93651CB1a3C5eDd3A9E6419aB6eb17f8 total gems: 8+++ gems (8000 plus) total gems lost: 4+++ gems (4000 left)
wallet address: 0x57A2DBc71eFb2C4B7e504A5f4637297eD2EC8d68 total gems: 6970 total gems lost: 2970
Loss Gems report Wallet: 0xa39edD1de5322e7d937B71DF4432096FA79025E4 Gems before:3654 Gems after: 2974
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pinoybfcsupportlostgems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pinoy support group - gems lost” (@pinoybfcsupportlostgems), 23 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinoybfcsupportlostgems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.