Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pinnspy

Channel

Pinnspy

@pinnspy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,572subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001676712843
TypeChannel
Username@pinnspy
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pinnspy

Growth

3,5573,5833,5706 August 2026 — 3,581 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,583 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,581 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,564 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,557 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,562 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,572 subscribers3,5726 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,553–3,587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 07:043,572+10
23 Aug 2026, 22:273,562+5
20 Aug 2026, 00:023,557-7
16 Aug 2026, 22:283,564-17
13 Aug 2026, 06:273,581+4
10 Aug 2026, 06:313,577-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:103,583+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:023,581first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8556.3%
👍1912.6%
🔥1610.6%
🤯85.30%
💅74.64%
🙉53.31%
😱42.65%
31.99%
🍾21.32%
👀10.662%
😍10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pinnspy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 February 2026 to 21 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC≈1,280 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Update: This match will probably be canceled, but our new Polymarket feed is now running, so we ill see what happens in next days

👍51😍1

21 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://polymarket.com/?r=pinnspy If you're new at Polymarket, its basically the same as Betfair, but with more volume. Today's mistake (or wrong opinion) is for this match: https://polymarket.com/sports/wta/wta-basilet-grant-2026-07-21 1.98 on Grant to win but also 1.96 on Grant to win with +1.5 Set Handicap at 1.96 is more than good. Grant to win first set at 1.96 is also good to back. Volumes are just 2-3k b

3🤯3🙉3👀1

21 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Do you use Polymarket and would you like to receive some Value Bets for it?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No29%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC≈3,130 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Brazil vs Morocco - Both teams to score?

  1. Yes, and Diaz will score one19%
  2. Yes63%
  3. No23%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

13 Jun 2026, 10:09 UTC≈2,990 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Brazil conceded 17 goals in 18 games during qualifications. Morocco scored 22 goals in 8 qualifying games. Good enough for me to flat stake this one also.

3🍾2💅2

13 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,760 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Will Qatar score a goal against Switzerland?

  1. Yes30%
  2. No70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC≈2,420 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Too bad for that Demirović miss. Lets continue today, and lets focus on singles instead: First Pick of the day, Quatar scoring no goals at all. Make sure you register on https://stake.com/?c=pinnspy its the best bookie out there, limits are high, so many give aways awaiting.

12 Jun 2026, 11:27 UTC≈2,150 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Now that we have some funds from yesterday, we can experiment today with this combo Make sure you register on https://stake.com/?c=pinnspy

3

11 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,700 views2 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

On our live stream, you can monitor World Cup match Mexico - South Africa, and if the bars go red, you make that bet. Still in test mode, but soon we will release it.. This is basically a graphical view of our Sbobet channel. Enjoy

👍2

11 Jun 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,610 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Make sure you register on https://stake.com/?c=pinnspy Raul Jimenez scoring a goal tonight is the best single bet out there at the moment. But you must be careful, its usually the guy from behind who scores in the first match. But let see Stake offer 2.42 for a Anytime Goal for Raul and that is the one we will also promote today.

3💅3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pinnspy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

Do you use Polymarket and would you like to receive some Value Bets for it?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No29%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTCAnonymous Poll170 voters

Brazil vs Morocco - Both teams to score?

  1. Yes, and Diaz will score one19%
  2. Yes63%
  3. No23%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTCFinal Results90 voters

Will Qatar score a goal against Switzerland?

  1. Yes30%
  2. No70%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 21 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 520,204 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Suspicious Game
@suspiciousgame · 65,393
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
Bet36_bet365 uk
@bet365_betting_Tips1 · 75,781
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
BetMines Football Predictions
@betminesfootballpredictions · 104,656
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
Trick Picks Free
@trickpicksfree · 90,862
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 August 2026
Betleaks
@Betleaks_Official · 64,410
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pinnspy” (@pinnspy), 3,572 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinnspy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.