Channel
@pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,331subscribers
-121 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003668218281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 29 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 2,331 | -13 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 2,344 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 2,355 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 2,365 | -17 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 2,382 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:24 | 2,388 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 2,392 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 2,399 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 2,404 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 2,413 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 2,418 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 2,427 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 2,436 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 2,442 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 2,452 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,029 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 1,214 | 40.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,085 | 35.8% | |
| 🤮 | 393 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 178 | 5.88% | |
| 🤣 | 37 | 1.22% | |
| 🥴 | 28 | 0.924% | |
| 😱 | 18 | 0.594% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.396% | |
| 🖕 | 9 | 0.297% | |
| 🙈 | 9 | 0.297% | |
| 🏆 | 8 | 0.264% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 0.264% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 0.264% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 0.198% | |
| 💩 | 5 | 0.165% | |
| 😴 | 5 | 0.165% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 0.099% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.066% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.033% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,029 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 12 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9wCb4gq/ Tolong bantu like, komen, dan share sebanyak-banyaknya agar kasus vertigo ini kembali mendapat perhatian. Sampai saat ini belum ada itikad baik dari pelaku untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini. Pelaku masih belum bertanggung jawab, sementara korban masih belum mendapatkan keadilan yang seharusnya.
❤110😭4🍓1
Signed huang
Halo, di sini saya mewakili Spillan Channel ingin menyampaikan beberapa poin: 1. Terkait kelanjutan kasus Vertigo, kami selaku admin sudah berusaha semaksimal mungkin. Namun, ada beberapa faktor yang membuat kami belum dapat melanjutkan kasus ini hingga ke jalur hukum (meja hijau). Hal tersebut disebabkan oleh keterbatasan informasi serta minimnya ketersediaan saksi, sehingga kasus ini cukup sulit untuk diproses leb…
❤111😱18🥴14😭8🥰6😴5🔥4🦄2
Signed c
i love you all💝
❤61
Signed huang
selamat malam guys, disini aku huang cuma ngomong kalo kalian bertemu oknum yang kaya vertigo lagi di ranah telegram atau dimana pun , be smart ya guys, jangan gampang ke trigger dan tetep waspada jangan sampe kena brain wash dan menjadi korban. jangan pernah takut buat ngadu sama orang tua kalian atau temen kalian semisal kalian dapet hal tidak mengenakan.
❤123😭20🤣9😢8💯7
Signed huang
sama sama pedofil, suka ngancem, pemerasan, pelecehan, manipulatif couple goals banget
😭141❤2
Signed huang
kalian baca novell broken strings ga? dari aurelie. jujur aku baca itu ga kuat, si bobby bobby ini keknya adek kakak sama vertigo udah cocok mendekam di penjara bareng bareng
😭164🔥12
Signed huang
kenapa sih dia ga menyerahkan diri ke polisi aja? enak loh, kan dia tipe yang gamau kerja maunya nganggur ya, ya udah tinggal masuk penjara tidur, itung itung maka gratis
😭122🥰6❤5
Signed huang
verti mau lebaran dluan biar bs dpt THR dri polisi
😭97❤4
Signed silent.
https://t.me/pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya/1597?comment=44201 mimin rasa dia puasa menahan lapar dan dahaga bukan karena ibadah tapi karena emang ga punya uang
😭32❤2
Signed huang
belum apa apa ku denger" ni vertigo puasa ya? mau lebaran duluan kah?
😭78
Signed silent.
halooo apa kabar kalian semua? semoga baik baik aja ya, sebelumnya aku pribadi dan mewakili admin lain minta maaf ya kalo beberapa waktu ini ga update tentang kasus ini, jujur kita emang lagi di kejar kesibukan dan ada hal hal lain yang ga bisa kita sampaikan ke kalian. tapi untuk kedepannya, sebisa mungkin kita kasih kabar baik lainnya, untuk berapa lama dan kapannya kita belum bisa memastikan, do'akan saja yang ter…
❤88💘6👍3
Signed huang
kira kira vertigo mampu nyaingin lu ga ya
😭128❤2
Signed huang
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BUKA MATA LO SEMUA!” (@pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya), 2,331 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinjolgadibayarusutkasusnya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.