Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 63 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 701–789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Oct 2026, 16:38
711
-2
30 Sept 2026, 08:01
713
-16
15 Sept 2026, 20:20
729
-8
8 Sept 2026, 18:20
737
-14
30 Aug 2026, 12:29
751
-6
24 Aug 2026, 10:23
757
-12
15 Aug 2026, 20:54
769
-9
8 Aug 2026, 14:23
778
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:48
779
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:28
779
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 21 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
213 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
25.4%
👍
54
25.4%
🔥
52
24.4%
🐳
14
6.57%
🍌
13
6.10%
🎄
7
3.29%
🎅
7
3.29%
☃
6
2.82%
🤪
3
1.41%
🤨
2
0.939%
🤡
1
0.469%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pingNFTs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 November 2025 to 5 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дропнул премиум подписку в бота🥱, словно монах сбросил старый плащ, дабы ощутить ветер свободы; ибо сказано: «Ветер ходит, где хочет». 😮💨
Когда ветер дует, не спрашивай, откуда он, просто открой окно. Теперь каждый, кто услышит зов команды /premium, может обрести доступ к подписке и привязать детальную статистику к любым желанным фильтрам, получая в утробе сообщения флор (подарка, модели, подарка+фона) и продажи (н…
🪣Сделал вкусный агрегатор продаж, доступный в любом чате, написав "@GiftsNotificationRoBot gift-number" (возможно скоро появится и в аппке)
Отображаются продажи такого номера (можно быстро смотреть продажи красивых номеров), модели, модели + фона. Мне самому долго не хватало бота, где нормально собираются продажи, а особенно с номерами, и, доделав его пару дней назад, решил сегодня выпустить его, чтобы любой человек …
🔠🔠🔠🔠 АКТИВНЫХ ФИЛЬТРОВ
Сегодня бот преодолел отметку в 1000 активных фильтров — и это отличный повод сказать спасибо каждому из вас!
Немного цифр, которые говорят сами за себя:
👤 1 321 пользователь хотя бы раз воспользовался ботом
✍️ 1 393 фильтра создано, из них 1 005 активно прямо сейчас
📬 6 483 096 подарков отправлено через бота
Кол-во отправленных подарков с каждого маркета -
TG Market — 3 739 358
Port…
😋В мини-аппе появилась новая функция с определением монохромности моделей+фона
Для каждого результата есть удобная статистика с количеством комбинаций на модель+фон
ping | chat
🎅 Залил обновление с полностью переработанной с нуля логикой проверки монохромности подарков. Я попытался довести её до идеала, но сделать это практически невозможно без участия нейросетей. Обычный скрипт просто никак не сможет понимать цвета, как человеческий глаз.
Я мог её довести до такого идеала, что 100% никогда не приходили бы неподходящие подарки, беря просто топ-1 модель на таком фоне, но при таком условии пр…
Добавил возможность конекта фильтра к любому типу чатов (обычный чат/чат с топиками).
Теперь на втором шаге при создании фильтров у вас будет 3 варианта: отправка в бота (самый обычный режим), в обычный чат и в чат с топиками. Все инструкции по добавлению бота в чат и т.п. сразу отобразятся.
Я в принципе впервые с таким работал, так что про все баги, если они есть, я могу быть не в курсе, и при их обнаружении вы, кон…
👋Только что добавил офчейн гетгемса. И с ним очень интересная ситуация: ни на сайте, ни в самом боте гетгемса я не нашел ничего связанного с историей подарков. А сам гетгемс еще очень странно отдает данные: когда вы заходите в недавно добавленные подарки на гетгемсе, вы не найдете на первой страничке подарков, у которых либо была изменена цена, либо которые были сняты с продажи и выставлены заново.
На первой странице…
❤5🔥2☃1🎄1🎅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pingNFTs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“>ping news” (@pingNFTs), 711 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pingNFTs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
