3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 672–681 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 02:28
673
-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:15
679
-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:46
680
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 673 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.8
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
8 (26 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
790
Reactions total
21
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
85.7%
🔥
3
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😀고모가 간다 5화.
(부제: 끝판왕 보스 등장)
고모게이를 아무도 부르지 않아 강제로 찾아갑니다.
그동안 아무짝에도 쓸모없는 제 채널에서 동고동락해 주신 분들에게 감사한 마음을 담아 한 분 한 분 식사를 대접해 드리려고 합니다. (거절 불가)
제 시드가 허락하는 한 언젠가 한국을 넘어 잘츠에 입학할 징멘까지 접선하겠다는 포부로…(비상 징멘을 만나버림;;)
그동안 고추들의 뜨끈한 국밥 파티가 힘드셨나요?
오늘은 이 더위를 날릴 미모의 여성 게스트가 나오셨습니다.
게스트 1: 스위스 알프스 소녀 징멘을 소개합니다.
'당신이 아픈 이유와 그 해결책'을 집필하신 옥살산 1타 강사이자 서울대학교 식품공악과 김진맨 교수로 역임하고 계시고, 곧 잘츠에도 입학 예정이신데 바쁘신 와중에도 한국에 내한해 주셨습니다.
제 채널에 계신 분들뿐만 아니라 …
주식용 부캐를 만들어
투자에 대한 아이디어 기록과 복기를 위해
블로그를 시작했습니다
얼마나 열심히 할지는 모르겠습니다
그래도 할까 말까 하면 하고 후회하는 스타일이라
일단 합니다
주식 ㅈ밥의 성장을 위한 기록입니다.
재밌게 봐주세요
* 크마뷰 채널은 항상 쥐듣노와 똥글을 지향합니다.
https://blog.naver.com/leverage_moment/224364041273
😀고모가 간다 4화.
(부제: 장어 악기바리)
고모게이를 아무도 부르지 않아 강제로 찾아갑니다.
그동안 아무짝에도 쓸모없는 제 채널에서 동고동락해 주신 분들에게 감사한 마음을 담아 한 분 한 분 식사를 대접해 드리려고 합니다. (거절 불가)
제 시드가 허락하는 한 언젠가 한국을 넘어 잘츠에 입학할 징멘까지 접선하겠다는 포부로…(비상 징멘 한국 옴)
오늘 게스트들은 정말 레.전.드입니다.
좀 길어요 미리 죄송
게스트 1: 텔레그램 채널 유동성 다 죽었는데 센세이션한 콘텐츠와 더불어 24/7 심지어 새벽부터 아침까지 수다가 끊이지 않는 채널이며, 많은 코인러들의 꿈이자 로망 sayyes햄
밋업에서 처음 봤을 때가 아직도 잊히지가 않습니다.
여태 살면서 어머님에게나 이런 포옹을 느껴봤을까?라는 감정을 느낄 정도로 정말 뜨겁고 따뜻하게, 그리…
식사는 하셨습니까 행님!!!
라멘에 관심을 가지게 된 요즘.
제가 살고 있는 천안은 멘야타마시 하나를 제외하면 라멘 불모지로 명성이 자자한 지역입니다.
그러던 차에 요즘 라멘 커뮤니티에서 조금씩 언급되고 있는 천안의 눛이라는 라멘집.
여긴 이에케 라멘 전문점이지만 사장님 본인이 라멘을 정말 좋아하시고 끊임없이 연구하시는 분이라 매달 이벤트 메뉴를 한두 가지씩 선보입니다. (츠케멘, 쿄카이 비빔라멘, 고등어 사바이탄 등)
이벤트 메뉴지만 그 맛이 꽤나 좋다고 합니다.
개인적으로는 아쉬운 건 츠케멘이라 쿄카이 비빔라멘같은 국물 없는 라멘을 상시 메뉴로 먹을 수 있으면 좋겠는데 한 번 선보인 메뉴는 몇 달이 지나도 다시 하지 않으십니다. ;;
그래도 감사합니다. 하면서 먹어야죠.
오늘 이벤트 메뉴는 꽃게 시오라멘하고 비빔라멘이라 오픈하자…
❤3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pinenut777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 532,418 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“식사방” (@pinenut777), 673 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinenut777.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.