Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🟢 PINCHE CHANNEL

Channel

🟢 PINCHE CHANNEL

@pinche_calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002195807058
TypeChannel
Username@pinche_calls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pinche_calls

Growth

6163627 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers12 October 2026 — 61 subscribers7 August 202612 October 2026
3 measurements spanning 66 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Oct 2026, 22:3861-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:1663no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:5963first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

3 Apr 2025, 16:05 UTC165 viewsread 10 August 2026

Bullrun will only start wen fed expect to low interest rate. Can start in june and this bullrun can end at the of the year

26 Mar 2025, 04:05 UTC162 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

My opinion, the pain is not over. This triangle will break to the downside, perfectly align with the tarif 2 of April deadline

26 Mar 2025, 01:29 UTC117 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

BTC dom going down until the 1 of april, before the tarif day on the 2 of april

26 Mar 2025, 00:39 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026

Wen i see #Avax pumping more than others, i can smell the game @playoffthegrid is about to go out !

9 Mar 2025, 17:27 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026

If someone can tell me, what's the next crypto narrative. I will be happy to hear it. Otherwise we will just go back to 72k

9 Mar 2025, 17:19 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026

After they ripp off the bitcoin strategic reseve narrative. Idon't see the next crypto narrative that will push us upward or even keep us at this price

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pinche_calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

OFF THE GRID
@PlayOffTheGrid · 241 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🟢 PINCHE CHANNEL” (@pinche_calls), 61 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pinche_calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.