🚀 Продюсер будущего. PPK «ResuRection» UK Charts 2001. Сделал сотни проектов за последние 30 лет. Продюсирую и консультирую 👉 @pimenov Женат, трое детей.
Мой сайт: pimenov.ai
Created
21 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
28 measurements spanning 98 days, net +608. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,181–6,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:58
6,881
-4
7 Nov 2026, 22:20
6,885
+331
5 Nov 2026, 06:49
6,554
+16
1 Nov 2026, 21:30
6,538
-3
30 Oct 2026, 04:01
6,541
+8
27 Oct 2026, 00:04
6,533
-3
24 Oct 2026, 09:05
6,536
-2
21 Oct 2026, 16:46
6,538
+10
18 Oct 2026, 04:30
6,528
+5
14 Oct 2026, 22:06
6,523
+6
11 Oct 2026, 18:55
6,517
+17
4 Oct 2026, 22:56
6,500
-2
26 Sept 2026, 02:16
6,502
+39
17 Sept 2026, 03:20
6,463
-2
13 Sept 2026, 05:58
6,465
-33
9 Sept 2026, 03:56
6,498
+24
3 Sept 2026, 14:37
6,474
+13
31 Aug 2026, 09:58
6,461
+16
28 Aug 2026, 09:53
6,445
+36
25 Aug 2026, 14:52
6,409
first reading
Engagement
147 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 6,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
964
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 147 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 89 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held
147 (4 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total
85,829
Reactions total
1,696
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Nov 2026, 18:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,840
Videos
≈1,470
Links
≈3,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 05m
Average length
5m 14s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,908 reactions across 144 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
991
34.1%
👍
508
17.5%
❤
446
15.3%
😁
279
9.59%
💯
123
4.23%
👏
90
3.09%
custom 6267267392728996760
67
2.30%
❤🔥
61
2.10%
🤣
61
2.10%
😱
57
1.96%
😍
42
1.44%
🙏
40
1.38%
🗿
18
0.619%
🏆
14
0.481%
👀
12
0.413%
🤪
11
0.378%
custom 5213012866143109939
10
0.344%
⚡
10
0.344%
🎉
10
0.344%
🤷♂
10
0.344%
10 further kinds
48
1.65%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 145 of the 147 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,908 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 147 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 146 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pimenov_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 147 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 89 posts held from the last 30 days (8.99%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Трейлер «NUREMBERG» от автора TUPACABRA набрал в X больше 20 миллионов просмотров и 100 тысяч лайков. За полторы минуты в нём проходят крестьяне в поле, придворные при свечах, бронированные солдаты и корабли, которые выходят из ледника.
Фильм автор делает в одиночку: он пишет, что он единственный создатель NUREMBERG 1561. Видео для трейлера он сгенерировал в Venice, сервисе, где собраны модели для текста, картинок и…
Приглашаю всех сегодня на традиционный воскресный вебинар. На этот раз все темы взяли из вопросов участников закрытого чата «Перезагрузка». Разберём:
1. Как выложить приложение в App Store и Google Play, если вы из России.
2. Голосовой агент на звонки клиентов: готовые решения, цены на робота под заказ и план запуска за неделю.
3. Как продвигать Telegram-канал: мои результаты в соцсетях и автопостинг сразу во все се…
Мои боты за две недели записали четыре песни про самих себя и сняли к ним клипы. А где же деньги?
Тексты пишет бот Музыкант, музыку он делает в Suno. Темы берёт из нашей же работы: ночная смена, мои закладки, пост, который пора выпускать в эфир. Режиссёр придумывает мир клипа, Reels Studio режет всё в бит. Я сам в Suno не захожу. Я тридцать лет продюсировал музыку и знаю, что застряну там до утра. Поэтому я дирижир…
В 2001 году на макси-сингле Светы «Что мне делать сегодня?» вышел Yadi Jazz Mix. Этот сингл продюсировал я. Музыкантов Yadi я знал лично — и теперь, спустя четверть века, их имя снова встретилось в нашем архиве, на записи с КаZантипа 2005 года.
Yadi появился в Ростове-на-Дону летом 2000-го. Проект основали Эльчин Акперов и Алексей Рыбалко. Оба начали заниматься электронной музыкой ещё в 1998 году: Эльчин работал в Н…
Ну вот и всё. Причём посчитают года за три назад, например. Всем приготовится.
Министерство финансов России намерено закрыть лазейку, с помощью которой граждане получают регулярный доход, но не платят с него налоги, маскируя его под переводы от физических лиц. Ведомство предложило обязать ЦБ передавать в налоговую службу сведения о гражданах, операции по счетам которых имеют признаки систематического получения доход…
Вы удивитесь, насколько всем на вас плевать.
Это лучшая новость, которую я понял после пятидесяти. Всю жизнь я работал на виду: радио, рейвы, сцена, продюсирование. И всё это время мне казалось, что за каждым моим шагом следят и ждут, когда я ошибусь.
А люди в это время думали только о том, как выглядят они сами.
Зал, перед которым вы боитесь опозориться, пустой, там никого нет. Все стоят на своей сцене и трясутся…
Дидье Дамбрен (Didier Dambrin, ник gol) — бельгийский программист, автор FruityLoops, из которой выросла FL Studio. В середине 90-х он в 19 лет выиграл конкурс разработчиков IBM «Da Vinci», и его сразу пригласили в бельгийскую компанию Image-Line.
Сначала он делал там игры, а в свободное время писал драм-машину, в которой все шаги для всех барабанов видны одновременно. 18 декабря 1997 года вышла FruityLoops 1.0. В 2…
В ночь с 31 марта на 1 апреля 1998 года Björk пришла на BBC Radio 1 в маленьком платье феи с серебряными крыльями. Спустя девять лет ведущая Mary Anne Hobbs вспоминала, что певица объяснила этот наряд воспоминаниями о музыке своего исландского детства. Вместо исполнения хитов Björk принесла на Breezeblock час чужих записей — собственную карту музыкального мира.
Ей было 32 года, но за плечами уже двадцать лет работы.…
Никто на вас не смотрит. Все заняты собой. Это и есть свобода.
Хорошего вам дня!
❤13💯9👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 147 posts we hold for @pimenov_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BandLink. СаундЧек @BandLink · 24,292 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Пименов” (@pimenov_ru), 6,881 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pimenov_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.