Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⚡️Pikachu's place⚡️

@pikachusplace

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,028subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001750458708
TypeChannel
Username@pikachusplace
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pikachusplace

Growth

3,0253,0283,026.57 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 3,025 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:25 — 3,028 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:168 Aug 2026, 06:25
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,025–3,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:253,028+3
7 Aug 2026, 07:163,025first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.8%
avg views ÷ 3,028 subscribers
Avg views / post
448
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.475%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,412
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
750.0%
🤯428.6%
🤩321.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC194 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/bstocksfinance post ca please

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

7 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC318 viewsread 8 August 2026

welp +50% if u bought with some public bot ~ ~ gz

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

7 Aug 2026, 00:14 UTC366 viewsread 8 August 2026

0xc72f232a6869e6cf34dc06129affd07f8a2a246a competetive launch on robinhood , have fun sers , many spammers dont be exit liquidity https://x.com/mancerxyz if u spamming let me join your pool 😂

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

5 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC423 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

was a good buy indeed

1

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

5 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC459 viewsread 8 August 2026

sold for little loss, theres new router deployed again , idk , ill wait for near launch for final

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

5 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC395 viewsread 8 August 2026

Back to 80k, lets see when pools open how it looks, if its not just a test should be ok

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC387 viewsread 8 August 2026

Well 2.2x so far gz if u aped Im not jeeting, maybe its mistake idk

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

5 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC527 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x9ff6145fdab04876399cac8d27e849f7d44738a07c966ea06552aa6d087da2d4 bought some of this deployed by uniswap dev (might be the new pools.trade factory) according to the new sdk atleast https://rh-scan.xyz/address/0x5638180327bd949ec0d27bb7ee5ff15a63d4824c Dev https://rh-scan.xyz/tx/0x68601a7f64f33aa6ede7df0170c0bb23b69650145492f38e3c53c30dea4263ec deploy ofcouse it might (and probab

1

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

4 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC391 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

here goes the dream if u think too much u lose position ;d

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

4 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC396 viewsread 8 August 2026

idk if its still worth or not lol still observing

Signed ⚡Pikachu⚡

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @pikachusplace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 366,363 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Maestro Hub
@MaestroBotsHub · 171,982
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Maestro Bot Updates
@MaestroSniperUpdates · 193,483
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚡️Pikachu's place⚡️” (@pikachusplace), 3,028 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pikachusplace.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.