Telegram 多地区突发连接异常 目前 Telegram 在全球多个国家和地区出现不同程度的服务异常,部分用户反馈消息无法正常收发,图片、视频等媒体内容加载失败,手机端和电脑端可能长时间停留在 “Connecting(连接中)” 或 “Updating(更新中)” 状态。 从目前情况来看,此次异常影响范围较广,并非个别账号或单一网络环境导致。相关故障反馈也在短时间内明显增多。 需要注意: 这类情况通常与个人使用的代理、VPN 或节点关系不大,频繁更换节点一般也解决不了问题。 Telegram 偶尔会出现类似的大范围服务波动,一年中可能遇到一两次,多数情况下等待一段时间后会陆续自行恢复。 目前具体故障原因以及完全恢复时间尚不明确,大家无需反复折腾设置,耐心等待并间隔一段时间重新尝试即可。 🍎老鹰OK :@chuizi @LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi

Channel
老鹰卖号🦅批发飞机
@pifafeiji
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,248subscribers
-4,230 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002030550146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @haoshangok @pifafeiji @pifafeijihao |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pifafeiji |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 1,248 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 1,252 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 1,252 | -8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 1,260 | -3,776 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 5,036 | -16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 5,052 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 5,067 | -41 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 5,108 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 5,112 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 5,114 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 5,116 | -66 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 5,182 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 5,182 | -57 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 5,239 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 5,243 | -90 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 5,333 | -14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 5,347 | -38 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 5,385 | -25 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 5,410 | -38 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:20 | 5,448 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 189.9%
- avg views ÷ 1,248 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,370
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (28 January 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,370 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
462 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 20.8% | |
| 😁 | 91 | 19.7% | |
| 👍 | 90 | 19.5% | |
| 🎉 | 87 | 18.8% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📱启用新用户名: @chuizi 🔴锤子的中文全拼🔴 重金购得典藏用户名 @chuizi 买飞机号,请找我,找老鹰OK,找锤子! 🍎老鹰OK :@chuizi @LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
📱认准本人用户名和+888号码哈! 📱收款地址用了很久了,一直没有变! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
📱接收定制各种电报bot机器人哈! 📱出各个飞机号,新号,老号全部有! 📱长期不限量开单月会员! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
❤1
天天给你们开会员,我自己的都不是会员😅 哪天到期的?居然没注意到! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
👍18🔥17🎉12❤11😁6
各国飞机号哈,全在出!有很老的,也有耐操的! 私我~~~ 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
美国会员号,适合打粉哈,每天出的量最多! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
赠送的,有人拿到了吧! 删除了! 免得成功公共号! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
一起看球,多多赢钱! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
找我买飞机号,做我的客户,时时有入金,天天游艇把嫩模哈👑😆 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
🔥39😁38🎉36❤35👍29
早~
👍1
打粉可以用周会员号 哈! 比开月会员会便宜省钱! 🍎老鹰OK :@LaoyingOK 🍎批发飞机: @PiFaFeiJi
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pifafeiji. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@pifafeiji named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“老鹰卖号🦅批发飞机” (@pifafeiji), 1,248 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pifafeiji.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.