你老鼠廢狗車路士一粒都唔俾埋...

Channel
🇫🇷法國佬.波馬心水分享🟢
@pierrecashon8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,755subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001918887858 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pierrecashon8 |
| Description | 睇法國佬心水⚽️ 齊贏馬會去溝女🥂 信譽No.1娛樂城🎰 老字號信心保證 開戶➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ (新客首充500送888/1000送1388) 討論區💬https://t.me/pierrecashon88 歡迎查詢🔍 @Fak_kwoklo888 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pierrecashon8 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 15,755 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.43%
- avg views ÷ 15,755 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,010
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.931%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 September 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 18,231 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,410
- Videos
- ≈303
- Links
- ≈2,790
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 41s
- Average length
- 2m 41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
169 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 43.8% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 21.3% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 11.8% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 6.51% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 3.55% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 2.96% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 2.37% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.78% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.592% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
今晚英超重心車路士大波繼續衝👍 比馬會高0.2水,遊戲反水2.5%💲 (*新客首充500送888/1000送1388*) 發財➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 歡迎查詢😻 @Fak_kwoklo888
❤8👍2🤬1😭1
收口靚重心齊食靚晚餐👍精神‼️ 比馬會高0.2水,遊戲反水2.5%💲 (*新客首充500送888/1000送1388*) 發財➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 歡迎查詢😻 @Fak_kwoklo888
❤10👍4🎉2🥰1
呢場歐霸重心搞掂✅登入收錢👍
❤12💯4👍2👏2🎉1
半場領先兩粒👍在線齊齊集氣🔥
🔥9👍2
精神12分鐘一球先
❤5
全力撐般尼茅夫🔥同路齊齊上👍 比馬會高0.2水,遊戲反水2.5%💲 (*新客首充500送888/1000送1388*) 發財➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 歡迎查詢😻 @Fak_kwoklo888
🔥15🎉2👍2🫡1
深夜歐霸盃 ⭐️波膽競猜活動⭐️ 03:00am 皇家蘇斯達vs 般尼矛夫 頭20位估中派$188💵(先到先得) 用我網址註冊嘅會員可獲得$288🧧 上車➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 歡迎查詢😻 @Fak_kwoklo888 (03:00am開波截止,編輯過唔計 ) ⬇️ 留言估波膽,估中派$188 ⬇️
❤6
日日打Poker💪 日日贏獎金🪙 免費賽獎金加倍,每週可贏1萬U🤑 19/9 22:00pm 發發發撲克挑戰賽 (贏家可獲8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣🔤🔤🔤🔤) Livegame➡️棋牌➡️Poker Mars 報名 上車➡️ http://www.livegame06.com/ 😀😀😀😀😀😀 特別活動 * 只要名稱改(法) 字開頭 (開賽前請先搵我申請報名參加活動) 法國佬戰隊會員,頭三名額外送💰 (只限巔峰撲克賽) 獲得第一名 額外送$2000 獲得第二名 額外送$1000 獲得第三名 額外送$1000 歡迎查詢😻 @fak_kwoklo888
❤5💯1🔥1
琴晚估中一比三波膽老友聯絡我 @Fak_kwoklo888
❤5🤬2
呢兩日啲波撞晒板! 懷疑未出火,要去清清槍精神下先 爽完揼埋個骨返嚟再覆桌!!
❤6🤬3😁1
講咗半場追和就追和,再給佢老母!
❤5🤬3🔥2😁2😱2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pierrecashon8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dargon_faii · 24,267
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
@armu_28 · 28,723
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
@apptips · 26,260
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇫🇷法國佬.波馬心水分享🟢” (@pierrecashon8), 15,755 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pierrecashon8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.