فيزياء - ميكانيكا - رياضيات
- الباب الاول45%
- الباب الثاني23%
- الباب الثالث33%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Marwan Babai

Channel
@physicsmarwanbabai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,305subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001573740660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @physicsmarwanbabai |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/physicsmarwanbabai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,305 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 2,314 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2,314 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
فيزياء - ميكانيكا - رياضيات
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Marwan Babai
سلام عليكم و مع قرب الامتحانات الفترة الاولى .. اعطوني اكثر ابواب تحسوهم صعبات نشرحهم و نحل عليهم اسئلة امتحانات سابقة ( فيزياء - ميكانيكا - رياضيات )
Signed Marwan Babai
وين واصلين ف منهج ؟
Signed Marwan Babai
فيزياء كهربائية - الباب الاول ( 5 ) .
Signed Marwan Babai
فيزياء كهربائية - الباب الاول ( 4 )
Signed Marwan Babai
الفيزياء الكهربائية - الباب الاول 2
Signed Marwan Babai
الفيزياء الكهربائية - الباب الاول (1)
Signed Marwan Babai
مستعدين ل اول يوم دراسي ولا مزال ؟ 🌚
Signed Marwan Babai
ترا كل حد يقولنا من وين يتابع ف قناة 😁
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Marwan Babai
القراية و اجلوها 😍
Signed Marwan Babai
محاضرة اليوم مادةً الفيزياء الكهربائية ب عنوان : الظواهر الكهرو استاتيكية ف مركز رؤى ليبيا 🤍💙
Signed Marwan Babai
استفتاء من اما دفعة ؟😁
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Marwan Babai
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @physicsmarwanbabai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فيزياء - ميكانيكا - رياضيات
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ترا كل حد يقولنا من وين يتابع ف قناة 😁
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
استفتاء من اما دفعة ؟😁
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2024 to 24 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 810,399 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فيزياء شهادة ثانوية | م.مروان باباي ⚡️” (@physicsmarwanbabai), 2,305 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physicsmarwanbabai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.