Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quantum Physics

Channel

Quantum Physics

@physics3p

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,503subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249651640
TypeChannel
Username@physics3p
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/physics3p

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,4969,5209,5086 August 2026 — 9,502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,502 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,504 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,507 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,511 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,519 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,520 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,509 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,501 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,496 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,502 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,505 subscribers8 September 2026 — 9,504 subscribers12 September 2026 — 9,507 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,503 subscribers9,5036 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,492–9,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 02:599,503-4
12 Sept 2026, 20:029,507+3
8 Sept 2026, 20:029,504-1
3 Sept 2026, 14:419,505+3
31 Aug 2026, 00:269,502+6
28 Aug 2026, 02:579,496-5
25 Aug 2026, 08:279,501-8
22 Aug 2026, 12:549,509-11
19 Aug 2026, 11:169,520+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:049,519+8
12 Aug 2026, 08:239,511+4
9 Aug 2026, 19:029,507+3
6 Aug 2026, 09:109,504+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:509,502no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:499,502first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

732 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤51970.9%
👍15120.6%
💯233.14%
👏111.50%
🔥101.37%
🤩70.956%
👎40.546%
🤔40.546%
🤯20.273%
😍10.137%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 732 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @physics3p. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC936 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Inquisitive Mind فضایی برای کاوش در فیزیک مدرن، مکانیک کوانتومی و پرسش‌های بنیادی درباره جهان است. در این کانال، علاوه بر بررسی مفاهیم علمی و ریاضیات مرتبط، با دانشمندان و ایده‌هایی آشنا می‌شویم که نگاه ما به جهان را تغییر داده‌اند. 🔗 لینک کانال: https://t.me/Nquisitivemind

❤8💯1

Signed Matin Abri

21 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,530 views23 reactionsread 29 August 2026

‍ اتم ها طیف جذبی خاصی دارند که نشان می‌دهد الکترون ها تنها با جذب‌ فرکانس های خاص تغییر سطح انرژی می‌دهند. برای درک این موضوع می‌توان تشبیه جالبی با امواج ایساده مکانیکی انجام داد. هنگامی که یک تار بین دو لبه ثابت می‌شود با ضربه به آن موجی در تار به راه می‌افتد. این موج با برخورد به لبه مقابل منعکس می‌شود و با موج اولیه تداخل می‌کند. برهمنهی این دو موج یا سریع سرکوب می‌شود و دامنه موج به صفر می‌رسد که در اکثر مواقع…

❤17💯4👍2

Signed Matin Abri

2 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈3,420 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🌀 نگاهی به اصل هولوگرافی در فیزیک نظری تصور کنید در یک اتاق نشسته‌اید، و تمام اتفاقاتی که در این اتاق می‌افتد (حرکت اشیاء، صداها، دما و حتی موقعیت شما در فضا) روی دیوارهای اتاق نوشته شده باشد. نه فقط خلاصه‌ای از آن‌ها، بلکه همه‌ی اطلاعات کامل و دقیق. اصل هولوگرافی می‌گوید: هر چیزی که در یک ناحیه از فضا رخ می‌دهد، می‌تواند به‌طور کامل روی مرز آن ناحیه، یعنی سطح اطرافش، ذخیره شود. اما چرا این ایده مطرح شد؟ ماجرا از…

❤29👍3🤯2

Signed Matin Abri

24 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC≈4,770 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🏆 برندگان جایزه فیلدز ۲۰۲۶ کنگره بین‌المللی ریاضیدانان، امسال در فیلادلفیا، نام چهار ریاضیدان برتر جهان را به عنوان دریافت‌کنندگان مدال فیلدز معرفی کرد: · یو دنگ (Yu Deng) – دانشگاه شیکاگو · جان پاردون (John Pardon) – دانشگاه استونی بروک · هونگ وانگ (Hong Wang) – مؤسسه IHES و دانشگاه NYU · جیکوب تسیمرمن (Jacob Tsimerman) – دانشگاه تورنتو از میان این چهار نام، دو برنده کارهایی انجام داده‌اند که مستقیماً با فیزیک نظ…

❤37👏6💯3👎1🤩1

Signed Matin Abri

23 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,720 views11 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#درخواست_کتاب روشهای ریاضی مکانیک کلاسیک آرنولد برای فروش به آیدی زیر پیام دهید: @matinCl

👍11

Signed Matin Abri

23 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,620 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

تعبیر چند جهانی در مکانیک کوانتومی داستان را با گربه معروف شرودینگر آغاز کنیم. به احتمال زیاد این آزمایش ذهنی را از بر هستید ولی بازهم یادآوری می‌کنم. درون جعبه‌ای یک شیشه حاوی سم وجود دارد که با احتمال ۵۰٪ شکسته و موجب مرگ گربه درون جعبه می‌شود و با احتمال ۵۰٪ گربه زنده می‌ماند. موضوع این است که تا پیش از باز کردن جعبه نمی‌توانیم از زنده یا مرده بودن گربه اطمینان حاصل کنیم. تنها می‌توان گفت گربه ممکن است با احتمال …

❤11👍4💯1

Signed Matin Abri

23 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,570 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026

آنتروپی، اطلاعات و انرژی آنتروپی یک سیستم بر مبنای تعداد پیکربندی های مختلفی که سیستم می‌تواند به خود بگیرد تعریف می‌شود. هرچه تعداد این پیکربندی‌ها بیشتر باشد، آنتروپی سیستم بیشتر خواهد بود. به بیانی دیگر، با افزایش آنتروپی میزان بی اطلاعی ما از سیستم افزایش می‌یابد. اطلاعات نیز بر اساس تعداد پیکربندی های مختلفی که سیستم می‌تواند به خود بگیرد معرفی می‌شود اما در این حالت ما دقیقاً می‌دانیم که سیستم درکدامیک از حالت…

❤20👏3💯2

Signed Matin Abri

12 Nov 2025, 16:49 UTC≈7,660 views69 reactionsread 29 August 2026

جرم و میدان الکترومغناطیسی یکی از ایده‌های الهام‌بخش فیزیک کلاسیک اواخر قرن نوزدهم، ارتباط جرم ذره‌های باردار با انرژی میدان الکترومغناطیسی اطرافشان بود. میدان مغناطیسی ذرات باردار متحرک، انرژی جنبشی دارد که متناسب با بار الکتریکی ذره است. این انرژی جنبشی، ناشی از میدان مغناطیسی ذره و نه جرم آن است. بنابراین اگر این انرژی جنبشی را با تعریف کلاسیک آن یعنی T=mv²/2 برابر قرار دهیم می‌توانیم جرم موثر مغناطیسی را بدست آو…

❤52👍15💯2

Signed Matin Abri

28 Aug 2025, 14:13 UTC≈8,930 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔹 ثابت کیهان‌شناسی و انرژی تاریک وقتی انیشتین در سال ۱۹۱۵ معادلات نسبیت عام را نوشت، حاصل کارش جهانی منبسط شونده یا منقبض شونده (غیرایستا) بود. در آن زمان تصور می‌شد که کیهان همیشه ثابت و بدون تغییر است. بنابراین اینشتین تصمیم گرفت جمله‌ای به معادلات اضافه کند: ثابت کیهان‌شناسی. این ترم جدید باعث می‌شد جاذبه‌ی گرانشی ماده، با نوعی دافعه‌ی کیهانی متعادل شود و جهان حالت ایستای خود را حفظ کند. این عامل به فضا–زمان یک ا…

❤41👍8💯1🔥1

Signed Matin Abri

26 Aug 2025, 18:56 UTC≈7,080 views33 reactionsread 29 August 2026

‍ فرار از ماده تاریک پدیده‌هایی که موجب معرفی ماده تاریک شد، می‌تواند به عنوان نارسایی های نسبیت عام نیز تلقی شود. شاید تفاوت پیش‌بینی‌های تئوری و مشاهدات تجربی در ناقص بودن توصیف ما از گرانش باشد و تصحیحاتی در تئوری بتواند مشکل را حل کند. به نظر این مسیر منطقی تر از معرفی ماده‌ای ناشناخته با ویژگی‌هایی عجیب باشد که اثرات گرانشی ایجاد می‌کنند. یکی از تلاش‌ها در این مسیر، نظریه‌ی گرانش اسکالر-تانسو-بردار جان موفات اس…

👍20❤12💯1

Signed Matin Abri

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @physics3p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Science Documentaries مستندهای علمی
@Documentary20 · 23,094
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
کانال علمی بیگ بنگ
@big_bangpage · 39,158
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 31 August 2026
دیالکتیک علمی
@ScientificDialectics · 24,277
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
نجوم 🛰
@njoom2070 · 30,784
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
📚کتابخانه دانشگاهی📚
@ketabkhaneh_daneshgahi · 64,736
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quantum Physics” (@physics3p), 9,503 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physics3p.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.