Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تکامل فیزیکی

@physical_evolution

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,066subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342852949
TypeChannel
Username@physical_evolution
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/physical_evolution

Growth

2,0662,0762,0716 August 2026 — 2,076 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,069 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,066 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,065–2,078 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:032,066-3
9 Aug 2026, 17:012,069-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:502,075-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:182,076first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18456.4%
👍8024.5%
😍5015.3%
👎61.84%
💔30.92%
🕊30.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Feb 2026, 16:28 UTC≈1,110 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers and possible beliefs and different degrees of uncertainty about different things, but I am not absolutely sure of anything and there are many things I don't know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we're here. فکر می کنم زندگی بدون دانستن خیلی جالب تر از داشتن پاسخ های

19😍4

6 Jan 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,420 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📰پردازنده کوانتومی حالت‌جامد با استفاده از اسپین‌های هسته‌ای معرفی شد. ▪️تیمی از پژوهشگران،یک پلتفرم پردازش کوانتومی حالت‌جامد (solid-state) را معرفی کرده‌اند که از اسپین‌های هسته‌ای (nuclear spins) در اتم‌های تنگستن (^183W) به عنوان کیوبیت بهره می‌برد. این سیستم در مقیاس چیپ، با زمان‌های پایداری (coherence) در حد چند ثانیه و سازگاری با تکنولوژی‌های ابررسانا، می‌تواند کنترل، آشکارسازی و درهم‌تنیدگی تک کیوبیت‌های هست

11👍3😍1

30 Dec 2025, 15:31 UTC≈1,250 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📰 پرتاب موفق سه ماهواره ایرانی به مدار؛ گامی تازه در برنامه فضایی کشور 🚀 به‌تازگی سه ماهواره ساخت ایران با موفقیت به مدار زمین پرتاب شدند؛ رویدادی که به‌عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین دستاوردهای اخیر برنامه فضایی کشور ارزیابی می‌شود. این پرتاب با استفاده از پرتابگر سایوز و از پایگاه فضایی وستوچنی انجام شد و هر سه ماهواره در مدار پایین زمین (LEO) قرار گرفتند. 📡 ماهواره‌های پرتاب‌شده شامل «پایا (طلوع-۳)»، «ظفر-۲» و «نمونه دوم

13😍9👍4👎4

29 Dec 2025, 18:54 UTC990 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📄 معرفی مقاله 🟠 ابررسانایی در لایه‌های نازک اپیتاکسیال ژرمانیوم هایپردوپ‌شده با گالیوم جایگزین در پژوهشی پیشگامانه منتشرشده در Nature Nanotechnology، تیمی به رهبری جولیان استیل، پیتر جاکوبسون و جواد شبانی، برای اولین بار ابررسانایی را در لایه‌های نازک اپیتاکسیال ژرمانیوم (Ge) با هایپردوپینگ جایگزین گالیوم (Ga) با غلظت حفره‌ای بی‌سابقه ۴/۱۵ × ۱۰²¹ cm⁻³ (معادل ۱۷/۹٪ جایگزینی Ga) گزارش کرده‌اند. این سیستم با دمای بحرا

5😍1

27 Dec 2025, 16:05 UTC≈1,120 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📰نشانه‌های کوانتومی از آگاهی: پژوهشی نوین پیشنهاد می‌کند مغز ممکن است از میدان صفر-نقطه بهره ببرد. ▪️در مقاله‌ای علمی، مدلی ارائه شده است که پیشنهاد می‌کند آگاهی ممکن است نتیجه‌ی هم‌آوایی مغز با میدان کوانتومی صفر-نقطه (zero-point field یا ZPF) باشد — میدان انرژی کوانتومی که در سراسر فضا وجود دارد. این دیدگاه فراتر از توضیحات معمولیِ صرفاً شبکه‌های عصبی است و فرض می‌کند پویایی‌های کوانتومیِ مقیاس‌کلان ممکن است نقش م

😍3👍21

23 Dec 2025, 18:41 UTC≈1,040 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#معرفی_کتاب 👨‍🏫 معرفی نویسنده: آرونکومار کریشناکومار (Arunkumar Krishnakumar)، متخصص برجسته در فناوری‌های نوظهور، با سال‌ها تجربه در حوزه بلاکچین و محاسبات کوانتومی. او به عنوان مشاور ارشد در شرکت‌های بین‌المللی، پروژه‌های واقعی در زمینه امنیت سایبری، فین‌تک و تحول دیجیتال را رهبری کرده و از نویسندگان شناخته‌شده انتشارات Packt است که مفاهیم پیچیده را به زبان ساده و کاربردی برای مدیران و مهندسان توضیح می‌دهد. 📚 معرف

10👍1

23 Dec 2025, 18:41 UTC≈1,010 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#معرفی_کتاب 📘نام اصلی کتاب : Quantum Computing and Blockchain in Business نام فارسی کتاب: محاسبات کوانتومی و بلاکچین در کسب‌وکار 🖋 نام نویسنده: آرونکومار کریشناکومار (Arunkumar Krishnakumar) 📅 سال انتشار: ۲۰۲۰ ✏️ زبان اصلی کتاب: انگلیسی ⚛ کانال تکامل فیزیکی @physical_evolution

9😍2

21 Dec 2025, 15:33 UTC≈1,240 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

. 🍉🌹 یلدا مبارک 🌹🍉 . ⚛کانال تکامل فیزیکی @physical_evolution

25😍2👍1

4 Dec 2025, 21:16 UTCviews —

تکامل فیزیکی pinned «📣 فرصت شغلی تولید محتوا در حوزه فیزیک 📝یک مجموعه علمی به یک نویسنده که به فضای تولید محتوا آشنا باشه نیازمند است. ⚛🔭اگر فارغ التحصیل فیزیک،یا دانشجوی ارشد و دکترا در رشته فیزیک و دست به قلم هستید و علاقه مندید در حوزه کاری مرتبط با رشته خودتون فعالیت کنید،فرصت…»

4 Dec 2025, 15:33 UTC≈1,840 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alzahraphysicsPhoto

🔰 انجمن علمی دانشجویی فیزیک دانشگاه الزهرا برگزار می کند: ⭕️کارگاه کاربرد پلاسمای سرد در پردازش سطوح ⭕️ سرفصل ها: 1- کاربردهای پلاسما 2- تعریف پلاسمای سرد 3- اثرات پردازش پلاسمایی پلیمر 4- مفاهیم اولیه آب دوستی و آب گریزی 5- فرآیندهای پردازش پلاسمایی مدرس: دکتر سولماز جمالی پژوهشگاه علوم و فنون هسته ای 🗓 یکشنبه ۱۶ آذر ماه ۱۴۰۴ ساعت ۱۲:۳۰ الی ۱۴:۳۰ 📍 سالن دکتر صعودی اگر دانشجوی دانشگاه الزهرا نیستید، برای حضور

12👍2

2 Dec 2025, 17:43 UTC≈1,730 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📣 فرصت شغلی تولید محتوا در حوزه فیزیک 📝یک مجموعه علمی به یک نویسنده که به فضای تولید محتوا آشنا باشه نیازمند است. ⚛🔭اگر فارغ التحصیل فیزیک،یا دانشجوی ارشد و دکترا در رشته فیزیک و دست به قلم هستید و علاقه مندید در حوزه کاری مرتبط با رشته خودتون فعالیت کنید،فرصت خوبی برای همکاری ست. 📌در صورت تمایل،با آیدی زیر با ما در ارتباط باشید. 🆔 @Pub_Relat

8😍4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @physical_evolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Nov 2025, 15:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz302 voters

سوال ۱۵ کدام گزینه بهترین تعریف از همدوسی(coherence)در نور است؟

  1. نورهایی که فرکانس بالاتری دارند6%
  2. نورهایی که قطبش یکسان دارند24%
  3. نورهایی با دامنه بیشتر4%
  4. نورهایی که اختلاف فاز ثابتی نسبت به هم دارند67%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Oct 2025, 16:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz226 voters

سوال ۱۴ کدام جمله درباره ی تداخل نور صحیح است؟

  1. تداخل پایدار فقط بین دو چشمه همدوس اتفاق می افتد47%
  2. تداخل فقط در نور لیزر رخ میدهد8%
  3. برای وقوع تداخل،چشمه های نوری باید شدت برابری داشته باشند17%
  4. تداخل نوری به فرکانس نور بستگی ندارد28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 2 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 702,491 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تکامل فیزیکی” (@physical_evolution), 2,066 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/physical_evolution.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.