Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Phygital

Channel

Phygital

@phygits

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

699subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002650473048
TypeChannel
Username@phygits
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/phygits

Growth

69971770813 August 2026 — 717 subscribers13 August 2026 — 717 subscribers21 August 2026 — 705 subscribers28 August 2026 — 699 subscribers13 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 696–720 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 10:13699-6
21 Aug 2026, 01:23705-12
13 Aug 2026, 13:58717no change
13 Aug 2026, 11:16717first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 23 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4531.9%
❤‍🔥3323.4%
custom 53596223392962561652417.0%
💯1510.6%
🥰117.80%
🔥85.67%
👍42.84%
🍌10.709%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @phygits. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 November 2025 to 2 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC252 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👾 Это первый ИИ-агент в Телеграм: ~ помогает с работой, бизнесом и учебой ~ генерирует картинки и документы ~ отвечает за тебя в лс ~ автоматизирует рутину Предупреждаем: он с характером — может и на*уй послать. Попробовать бесплатно →

18 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC868 views11 reactions1 Starread 13 August 2026
Photo

😍 Розыгрыш коллекционной пепы! Коллеги по цеху из @cryptobot запустили свой @VPN прямо в Телеграм, по этому случаю делаем розыгрыш 🎁 Условия крайне просты: • Перейти в @VPN • Выполнить 3 простых задания или оформить подписку Победители будут выбраны через рандомайзер ровно через 1 неделю — 25 января. Для верификации пришлите скриншоты из мини-приложения менеджеру @PhygitalManager. Соблюдение условий обязательна!

❤‍🔥43💯3🍌1

4 Jan 2026, 19:57 UTC852 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6👍4❤‍🔥3

17 Dec 2025, 16:16 UTC695 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

🎁 Plush Pepe — ВСЁ Ведь еще одни долгожданные классические пепы только что были отправлены заказчикам! Совсем скоро мы вас кое-чем удивим 🤭 😍 @phygits

❤‍🔥63💯3

4 Dec 2025, 17:06 UTC845 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8🥰7❤‍🔥52

29 Nov 2025, 15:35 UTC≈1,090 views29 reactions7 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😍 Бренд новый — качество прежнее Только что мы провели ребрендинг проекта Plush Gift, теперь мы Phygital — термин, обозначающий слияние цифрового искусства с физическим (Physical + Digital) 🎉 🎁 И нет, мы не продали проект, все остается по прежнему. Новый имидж лучше передает наше видение и дальнейшие планы Актуальные ссылки: @phygits — основной канал @PhygitalManager — менеджер @PlushPepeOffers — витрина Будьте в

custom 535962233929625616513💯97

27 Nov 2025, 09:22 UTC883 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Хотели бы вы приобрести более дешевые товары, до 50$ (украшения, брелоки, мерч)?

  1. Да! Точно куплю45%
  2. Возможно, если будут красивое..32%
  3. Скорее нет, чем да10%
  4. Точно нет, мне это не интересно12%
  5. Свой ответ в комментариях1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8❤‍🔥5🥰4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @phygits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Nov 2025, 09:22 UTCAnonymous Poll157 voters

Хотели бы вы приобрести более дешевые товары, до 50$ (украшения, брелоки, мерч)?

  1. Да! Точно куплю45%
  2. Возможно, если будут красивое..32%
  3. Скорее нет, чем да10%
  4. Точно нет, мне это не интересно12%
  5. Свой ответ в комментариях1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 629,640 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Phygital” (@phygits), 699 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phygits.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.