Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Философия за 300

@philosophy300

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

443subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001493684042
TypeChannel
Username@philosophy300
Created26 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/philosophy300

Growth

4434454446 August 2026 — 445 subscribers6 August 2026 — 445 subscribers14 August 2026 — 443 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 443–445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:05443-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:17445no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:02445first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

217 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4319.8%
😁3717.1%
👍2612.0%
2411.1%
👻135.99%
👏115.07%
😭104.61%
🤯104.61%
🤣94.15%
🤮94.15%
💯52.30%
🤔52.30%
🥰41.84%
❤‍🔥31.38%
😢20.922%
🙈20.922%
🕊10.461%
🙏10.461%
🤝10.461%
🤡10.461%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 217reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2023 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 20:46 UTC210 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Please Oh Please And you cried and you cried There's something shaky about this whole enterprise You know we've heard it all before Every generation or so Someone new comes along To tell us what we've been doing wrong But it's getting hard to take them seriously Because it's always a different theory It's always a different theory But you cried Please stop Please stop doing metaphysics Please oh please stop We can'

🔥3😁21

5 Apr 2024, 15:05 UTC≈1,640 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👻13🤯85😢2❤‍🔥1🕊1🤔1

28 Feb 2024, 09:55 UTC≈1,370 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Концептуальный анализ принято считать одной из главных целей философии. В ходе такого анализа философы проясняют суть исследуемых понятий. Например, в диалоге Платона «Теэтет» Сократ обсуждает необходимые и достаточные условия знания. Современные философы вспомнили заветы Маркса и перешли от объяснения языка к его изменению. Отправной точкой для такого перехода является идея о том, что понятия - это инструменты мышле

👍10🤔2

22 Feb 2024, 17:17 UTC≈1,700 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Оглавление, предисловие, введение, первая глава

🔥41👍1🤝1

22 Feb 2024, 17:15 UTC683 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @hsepublish

https://iq.hse.ru/news/895117673.html Научно-образовательный портал IQ.HSE предлагает прочесть фрагмент из готовящегося учебника "Метафизика. Современное введение" (Майкл Дж. Лакс, Томас М. Крисп, пер. с англ. М. Семиколенных под науч. ред. С.М. Левина, ISBN 978-5-7598-2712-2) 👀🌚🔮⏳🌀📚

🔥51👍1

11 Feb 2024, 15:47 UTC≈1,230 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почитатели Канта и Гегеля.

😁10👍2🤯1

11 Feb 2024, 11:30 UTC880 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Матвей Троицкий, Немецкая психология в текущем столетии. Том 2: Немецкая психология текущего столетия в её главных направлениях. М. Изд. 2-е, 1883. С. 466. Философия духа – чепуха, возбуждающая тошноту 😱

🔥5😁1🙏1

11 Feb 2024, 11:27 UTC781 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Матвей Троицкий, Немецкая психология в текущем столетии. М., 1867. С. 616. Троицкий считал, что все хорошее в немецкой философии взято из английской, а сама немецкая философия - банкрот.

❤‍🔥2🔥2👍1

10 Feb 2024, 10:00 UTC750 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Удивительно, насколько это созвучно вопросам, обсуждаемым в современной философии сознания.

🔥3

10 Feb 2024, 09:41 UTC839 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Матвей Троицкий, Современное учение о задачах и методах психологии. М., 1885. С.14.

🔥3👍1

2 Jan 2024, 16:53 UTC≈1,060 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭8😁5👏2

17 Dec 2023, 07:44 UTC≈1,930 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Россиянин подает заявку на visiting position в Гарвард.

13💯4😭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @philosophy300. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Философия за 300” (@philosophy300), 443 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philosophy300.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.