Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أستاذ الفلسفة قادري رياض

Channel

أستاذ الفلسفة قادري رياض

@philoriad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,362subscribers

-148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693937547
TypeChannel
Username@philoriad
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/philoriad

Growth

4,3624,5104,4367 August 2026 — 4,510 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,510 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,494 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,472 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,460 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,444 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,420 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,408 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,392 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,379 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,362 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net -148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,340–4,532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 02:144,362-17
1 Sept 2026, 16:564,379-13
30 Aug 2026, 01:044,392-16
26 Aug 2026, 23:364,408-12
23 Aug 2026, 22:054,420-24
19 Aug 2026, 23:024,444-16
16 Aug 2026, 21:034,460-12
13 Aug 2026, 18:284,472-22
11 Aug 2026, 01:364,494-16
7 Aug 2026, 15:314,510no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:214,510first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

818 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77194.3%
🥰192.32%
👍101.22%
🔥60.733%
😢60.733%
👏30.367%
😭30.367%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 818 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 15 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Apr 2026, 20:04 UTC≈3,630 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Io7ZJ_1qWY&t=166s

64👍5🔥3😭3🥰1

Signed رياض قادري

19 Nov 2025, 14:51 UTC≈7,840 views74 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فتح فوج أول وأخير أونلاين شعبة آداب وفلسفة عدد الأماكن محدود جدا جدا الدراسة عبر منصة فتحة للاستفسار تواصل مع @philotude

74

Signed رياض قادري

16 Nov 2025, 18:44 UTC≈7,120 views83 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

نصيحة على السريع هل الفلسفة تفهم أم تحفظ!

75👍5🔥3

Signed رياض قادري

16 Nov 2025, 14:45 UTC≈6,830 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

هل ترون أن التَعليم الالكتروني مفيد لكم؟

  1. مفيد82%
  2. غير مفيد18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30🥰2

Signed رياض قادري

15 Nov 2025, 20:35 UTC≈5,900 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026

بزاف طلبة تحصلو على علامات ممتازة في مادة الفلسفة. سر التميّز يمكن لأيّ أستاذ يعطيلك وصفاته لكن من أجل أن تحقق هذه الوصفات لازم تكون عندك لغة زوينة... حاب تفهم الفلسفة بلا ما تحفظ كل شيء لازملك لغة زوينة. حاب تكتب مقال ممتاز لازملك لغة زوينة. التميّز في الفلسفة= التميز في اللغة

59

Signed رياض قادري

12 Nov 2025, 21:13 UTC≈5,450 views95 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الا حاب تنجح ما تأجلش أعمالك، نظم وقتك، وابذل جهد مضاعف

91🥰4

Signed رياض قادري

6 Nov 2025, 19:33 UTC≈5,580 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

هل تفهمون مادة الفلسفة:

  1. لما يشرحها الأستاذ بالعامية46%
  2. لما يشرحها الأستاذ بالفصحى22%
  3. لا أفهمها أصلا32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

33🥰1

Signed رياض قادري

4 Nov 2025, 16:56 UTC≈4,990 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

أكبر مشكل لقيتموه في دراسة المادة هو

  1. صعوبة فهم الأفكار الفلسفية20%
  2. عدم القدرة على كتابة المقال بسبب اللغة35%
  3. لم أجد الوقت الكافي لمراجعتها38%
  4. الأفكار المسبقة عن المادة أثرت فيّ6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30😢6🥰2

Signed رياض قادري

4 Nov 2025, 14:32 UTC≈4,360 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

مدى فهمكم لمحتوى مادة الفلسفة

  1. ممتاز11%
  2. جيد22%
  3. حسن19%
  4. متوسط21%
  5. سيء26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27🥰1

Signed رياض قادري

26 Oct 2025, 20:05 UTC≈3,780 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fat7acourPhoto

باقات فتحة الخاصة بالفصل الأول الشعب العلمية والتقنية البداية هذا الثلاثاء مع أستاذ الفلسفة قادري رياض الشعبة الأدبية البداية الأسبوع المقبل إن شاء الله لمعلومات أكثر يمكنكم الولوج إلى الرابط https://fat7a.com/courses/

33

Signed رياض قادري

23 Oct 2025, 18:41 UTC≈3,610 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fat7acourPhoto

يا مرحبا بالجميع

33👏3

Signed رياض قادري

21 Oct 2025, 22:00 UTC≈3,150 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @fat7acourPhoto

أول حصة تنظيمية في مادة الفلسفة مع الأستاذ قادري رياض خاصة بالشعب العلمية والتقنية

28

Signed رياض قادري

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @philoriad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Nov 2025, 14:45 UTCAnonymous Poll604 voters

هل ترون أن التَعليم الالكتروني مفيد لكم؟

  1. مفيد82%
  2. غير مفيد18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Nov 2025, 19:33 UTCAnonymous Poll670 voters

هل تفهمون مادة الفلسفة:

  1. لما يشرحها الأستاذ بالعامية46%
  2. لما يشرحها الأستاذ بالفصحى22%
  3. لا أفهمها أصلا32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2025, 16:56 UTCAnonymous Poll574 voters

أكبر مشكل لقيتموه في دراسة المادة هو

  1. صعوبة فهم الأفكار الفلسفية20%
  2. عدم القدرة على كتابة المقال بسبب اللغة35%
  3. لم أجد الوقت الكافي لمراجعتها38%
  4. الأفكار المسبقة عن المادة أثرت فيّ6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2025, 14:32 UTCAnonymous Poll567 voters

مدى فهمكم لمحتوى مادة الفلسفة

  1. ممتاز11%
  2. جيد22%
  3. حسن19%
  4. متوسط21%
  5. سيء26%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 15 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

وظائف و كورسات كلية تجارة
@com_jobs · 28,579
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 9 September 2026
Cours DZ Bac2026/2027 بكالوريا _) (_عقبة بن نافع _الاستاذ نور الدين ) 🩺💉❤🎓
@bacavec20 · 40,559
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
عقبة بن نافع - الامتياز في البكالوريا - مسار علمي📘
@nafi3_bac_dz_1954 · 190,624
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أستاذ الفلسفة قادري رياض” (@philoriad), 4,362 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/philoriad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.