Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Phase Today

Channel

Phase Today

@phasetoday

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

367subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001454205527
TypeChannel
Username@phasetoday
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/phasetoday

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3673713697 August 2026 — 369 subscribers8 August 2026 — 369 subscribers16 August 2026 — 371 subscribers23 August 2026 — 370 subscribers30 August 2026 — 369 subscribers30 September 2026 — 368 subscribers10 October 2026 — 367 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 64 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 366–372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 13:40367-1
30 Sept 2026, 21:41368-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:48369-1
23 Aug 2026, 02:46370-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:26371+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:20369no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤931.0%
👍724.1%
🤣517.2%
😁413.8%
⚡13.45%
👏13.45%
🔥13.45%
🥰13.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 13:57 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A new study published in the journal Dreaming investigated whether lucid dreaming training could improve emotional processing. However, the strongest effects were linked to REM sleep itself rather than lucid dreaming. Researchers Jamie Tartar, Logan Bratter, Shiny Lal, and Jonathan Banks studied 80 participants who underwent EEG sleep monitoring and completed lucid dreaming training. The training did not increase …

22 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A new study published in J Sleep Res explored the relationship between sleep paralysis and interoception, the ability to notice and interpret internal bodily signals. Researchers Giuseppe Forte, Danilo Giaccari, Francesca Favieri, and Maria Casagrande surveyed 210 participants and found that about one in four had experienced at least one episode of sleep paralysis. Sleep paralysis was not associated with poor sleep…

👍1

17 Jul 2026, 11:28 UTC107 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A recent study published in the International Journal of Dream Research found that many teenagers experience lucid dreams even if they do not know the term "lucid dreaming." Researchers Michael Schredl and Lillien Müller surveyed 226 adolescents aged 10–20. About 53% reported at least one lucid dream, meaning they realized they were dreaming while asleep. Only about one third knew what lucid dreaming was before the …

👍3

15 Jul 2026, 13:44 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We're returning to regular publishing. Our mission is to share the latest research and discoveries in lucid dreaming, sleep, and consciousness. Going forward, you can expect regular science news, reviews of new studies, and the most exciting discoveries in the field. From now on, all major Phase Today publications will be released first in the LucidMe app. Follow our page so you don't miss any updates. LucidMe on…

❤3👍3👏1🥰1

7 Sept 2025, 15:00 UTC423 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣3😁2🔥1

2 Sept 2025, 15:00 UTC411 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

September 2 – Stephen LaBerge’s Birthday Stephen LaBerge is an American psychophysiologist, the founder and head of the Lucidity Institute, and the author of books that are widely read by lucid dreamers around the world. In 1980, he received his doctorate, presenting a dissertation on lucid dreaming (LD) at Stanford University. Eight years later, the Los Angeles Times called him “Dr. Dreams” at a time when LD was a…

❤2

1 Sept 2025, 15:03 UTC270 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤1🤣1😁1

31 Aug 2025, 15:10 UTC224 viewsread 8 August 2026

August 31 – Patricia Garfield's birthday Patricia Garfield, PhD in clinical psychology, is a world authority in the field of dreams. She has written more than ten books on the topic, the most famous among them being Creative Dreaming. The bestseller was published in 1974, appeared in fifteen languages, and is considered a classic. Garfield was a frequent guest on television and radio, as well as a co-founder of the …

18 Aug 2025, 15:08 UTC196 viewsread 8 August 2026

How to Distinguish a Near-Death Experience from Delirium Near-death experiences aren’t all that rare. As many as 20% of people who survive cardiac arrest and 15% of those who’ve been in intensive care report having various “adventures.” Incidentally, the impact of these “journeys” can be either positive (e.g., increased empathy, reduced fear of death) or negative (e.g., misunderstanding from others, psychological is…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @phasetoday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Phase Today” (@phasetoday), 367 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phasetoday.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.