Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

آثار پرشین گیک پدیا

@pgpbase

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002490347235
TypeChannel
Username@pgpbase
Descriptionچون کانال قبلی دیگه علنی کانال اخبار شده به بهونه‌ی شروع ۴ سالگی این کارو میخوام بکنم فقط لینک محتواهارو خواهم گذاشت شاید کمی هم بنویسم -مترجم سایر شبکات اجتماعی: https://zil.ink/pgp
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pgpbase

Growth

2017 Aug 2026, 20:24 — 201 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 201 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 20:248 Aug 2026, 11:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:31201no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:24201first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
943.8%
avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,900
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.416%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total37,939
Reactions total158
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Links
65

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6339.9%
🔥4629.1%
😁2817.7%
👎2012.7%
👍10.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,400 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Spider-Man: Brand New Day واقعاً خوبه؟ | نقد بدون اسپویل Spider-Man: Brand New Day بالاخره رسید؛ اما آیا این فیلم توانسته یک داستان متفاوت و شخصی‌تر برای پیتر پارکر روایت کند؟ در این ویدیو بدون اسپویل، Spider-Man: Brand New Day را بررسی می‌کنیم و درباره نقاط قوت و ضعف فیلم حرف می‌زنیم؛ از داستان و شخصیت پیتر پارکر گرفته تا اکشن‌ها، ویلین، شخصیت‌های فرعی و بازی بازیگران. 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 📺 اینستاگرام 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠

2👍1🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC≈7,810 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

زیرنویس آمادست این ویدیو رو ببین نکته سوم خیلی مهمه لنگ نمونی 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

10

31 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC≈3,920 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

زیرنویس اسپایدرمن امشب؟/فردا شب؟ کانال تلگرام : https://t.me/thepersiangeekpedia یوتیوب : https://www.youtube.com/@persiangeekpedia حمایت مالی : donito.me/thepgp 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

8😁3

31 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC≈5,050 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

زیرنویس فارسی اسپایدرمن کی آماده میشه؟کجا میذاریم؟ کانال تلگرام : https://t.me/thepersiangeekpedia یوتیوب : https://www.youtube.com/@persiangeekpedia حمایت مالی : donito.me/thepgp 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

2

29 Jul 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,090 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💢اسپایدرمن منتشر شد + زیرنویس فارسی اولین کیفیت پرده‌ای فیلم اسپایدرمن منتشر شد منتظر کیفیت‌های بهتر و حجم های کمتر و زیرنویس اختصاصی این فیلم باشید مراقب اسپویل‌ها هم باشید🙏🏻 #spiderman #spidermanbrandnewday #marvel #اسپایدرمن #مارول 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

🔥6

29 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,610 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

اگه فیلمنامه فیلم Spider-Man: Brand New Day دست ما بود، داستانش دقیقاً چه شکلی می‌شد؟ در این ویدیو بر اساس کامیک‌ها، شخصیت‌ها و اتفاقات احتمالی، نسخه خودمون از داستان Spider-Man: Brand New Day رو می‌نویسیم و بررسی می‌کنیم که حضور شخصیت‌هایی مثل The Hand، Hobgoblin، Scorpion، Tombstone، Jean Grey و دیگر کاراکترها چگونه می‌تواند داستان را جذاب‌تر کند. اگر طرفدار مارول، اسپایدرمن، کامیک‌ها و تئوری‌های فیلم‌های MCU هست

5

28 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,090 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

راز تاریک تریلر Lanterns | وقتی گرین لنترن شبیه True Detective می‌شود! 🕵️‍♂️💚 توی سریال جدید لنترنز، هل جردن اصلاً از آموزش دادن به جان استوارت خوشحال نیست! چرا روش‌های آموزشیش اینقدر خشنه؟ در این ویدیو به اختلاف طبقاتی و شخصیتی این دو قهرمان پرداختیم و بررسی کردیم که چطور یه پرونده قتل ساده قراره کل تاریخ Green Lantern Corps رو زیر و رو کنه. از ساختارهای مهندسی جان استوارت تا خلاقیت‌های چشم‌بسته هل جردن؛ همه چیز ا

6

28 Jul 2026, 00:24 UTC333 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

رفقا دم مرامتون گرم بی زحمت اینو یه لایک بزنید عشق میدید❤️

8👎4

27 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC≈1,050 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اسپایدرمن گولت زد! اینو ندیدی کلا هدف اینا اینه یه صحنه ای توش باشه که تورو گول بزنن قبل این ویدیو گول خورده بودی یا نه؟ 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

9😁3🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC826 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💢گوست رایدر رایان گاسلینگ و تریلر جدید دومزدی! |💀 هر چیزی که در comiccon 2026 معرفی شد رویداد comic con 2026 برگزار شد و مارول با معرفی‌های جدیدش اینترنت رو منفجر کرد. از نبرد حماسی ثور با دکتر دووم (رابرت داونی جونیور) تا تایید حضور رایان گاسلینگ در Ghost Rider جدید! 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia

🔥6😁3

25 Jul 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

در این ویدیو به سراغ جنجالی‌ترین تئوری‌ها و مدارکی رفتیم که ادعا می‌کنن فیفا برای موفقیت دوباره آرژانتین و مسی در جام جهانی بعدی برنامه‌ریزی کرده بود. از تغییر قوانین تا انتخاب میزبان‌ها، پشت‌پرده‌هایی را بررسی می‌کنیم که شاید کمتر کسی به آن‌ها توجه کرده باشد. پ.ن : میزان استقبال شما در ساخت ویدیوهای این چنینی کانال بسیار موثر خواهد بود،بوس. 🪙 لینک حمایت مالی 🤓 @pgpbase 🧠@thepersiangeekpedia 🍿 @comicpersia

🔥7👎61

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pgpbase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 192,910 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آثار پرشین گیک پدیا” (@pgpbase), 201 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgpbase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.