Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Peyzu

Channel

Peyzu

@peyzu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,993subscribers

+335 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001392960655
TypeChannel
Username@peyzu
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/peyzu

Growth

12,57412,99312,783.56 August 2026 — 12,658 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,628 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,612 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,603 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,584 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,586 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,625 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,896 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,993 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,511–13,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:3812,993+97
14 Aug 2026, 15:0712,896+271
13 Aug 2026, 04:1512,625+51
12 Aug 2026, 02:2212,574-12
11 Aug 2026, 05:1112,586+2
10 Aug 2026, 04:4212,584-19
9 Aug 2026, 04:1112,603-9
8 Aug 2026, 06:1712,612-16
7 Aug 2026, 06:2612,628-30
6 Aug 2026, 18:4612,658first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.7%
avg views ÷ 12,993 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,410
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held8 (24 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total67,290
Reactions total3,908
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,908 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,72369.7%
🔥42410.8%
custom 53143786040443750881965.02%
😍1864.76%
custom 52741301648658346871543.94%
👍812.07%
custom 5382132232829804982741.89%
custom 5283257721989111510561.43%
🙏140.358%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,908reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
61
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 8 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
21
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @peyzu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈4,160 views397 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026

Честно скажите, ноги медом мазали сегодня? 😅

260custom 531437860404437508852👍33🔥17custom 528325772198911151016😍6custom 52741301648658346876custom 53821322328298049825

11 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC≈8,450 views548 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

С детства очень люблю зелёный цвет! Замечаю его везде! У меня даже есть отдельная папка с сохранёнными изображениями зелёного цвета. И мой гардероб все сильнее зеленеет с годами. У Кандинского есть классная книга «О духовном в искусстве». В ней он пишет о воздействии цвета на человека: «Зелёный возникает при смешении противоположных начал: жёлтого, символизирующего движение к зрителю, тепло и радость, и синего, си

342custom 5274130164865834687103🔥45custom 528325772198911151020👍15😍13custom 53143786040443750886custom 53821322328298049824

9 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈7,540 views384 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Этого стилягу узнаете? Илья Ковальчук! Глыба, не иначе! Давайте попробуем задать ему вопросы в рамках доброй рубрики. Пишите в комментариях ниже. Выберу несколько из них. Сделаем доброе дело вместе уже в третий раз. А как это было ранее с другими гостями, оставляю удобные ссылки: - что за добрая рубрика - ответы от Торнике - сколько собрали для фонда - ответы от Никиты Нагорного - сколько собрали для фонда

281🔥60custom 531437860404437508824😍8custom 53821322328298049826custom 52832577219891115103custom 52741301648658346872

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC≈7,500 views453 reactions10 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

290🔥87😍39custom 531437860404437508811👍9custom 52741301648658346876custom 53821322328298049826custom 52832577219891115105

1 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈10,400 views636 reactions21 Starsread 15 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

453🔥106custom 531437860404437508845😍16custom 52832577219891115106👍5custom 52741301648658346875

30 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC≈11,100 views215 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Вот такая интересная инфографика средних цен на капучино в Москве. Москвичи, делитесь, где пьёте кофе? А если вы не из Москвы, то какой город и какая средняя цена за 0,3л?

164custom 527413016486583468717custom 538213223282980498217🔥13😍2custom 52832577219891115102

29 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC≈9,050 views534 reactions5 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас я в Москве уже. С опозданием, но не нарушая традиции любой поездки, делюсь открытками для ваших экранов из US. Кто где находится? Летний отпуск уже был?

377🔥78custom 538213223282980498228😍18custom 531437860404437508818👍7custom 52741301648658346875custom 52832577219891115103

24 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC≈9,090 views741 reactions13 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

После избытка позитивных эмоций и количества перелетов приехал домой, в Дагестан. Смена часовых поясов далась мне сложно… Поэтому восстанавливаюсь в кругу родных. Не теряйте меня! Скоро вернусь. Всех обнял🫂

556😍84custom 531437860404437508840🔥18👍12🙏12custom 527413016486583468710custom 53821322328298049828

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @peyzu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 882,405 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Peyzu” (@peyzu), 12,993 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peyzu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.