Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

E T Y A

@petyaetoya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,044subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001092931052
TypeChannel
Username@petyaetoya
Created18 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/petyaetoya

Growth

1,0401,0441,0426 August 2026 — 1,041 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,040 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,042 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,044 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,039–1,045 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:031,044+2
9 Aug 2026, 19:411,042+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:021,040no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:311,040-1
6 Aug 2026, 00:521,041first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.5%
avg views ÷ 1,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
496
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total6,445
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 60330719314087806888744.6%
custom 52426778272994503406834.9%
custom 52377212976009124882512.8%
custom 632547644454155241084.10%
🤔31.54%
🙏21.03%
🫡21.03%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petyaetoya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC260 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

жалко, что Олега уволили, а так бы пришлось ему интервью давать. 🫡

custom 52426778272994503405custom 60330719314087806885custom 52377212976009124882🫡1

5 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC220 views17 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bs_businessPhoto

🥧 «Я придумал продавать пироги с балкона по приколу» Пока общепит переживает кризис, а посещаемость ресторанов снижается, Петр Мартюк открыл кафе прямо на своем балконе — к нему выстроились очереди из клиентов. Мы поговорили с Петром @petyaetoya — в карточках он рассказал, как превратил прикол в вирусное событие и чему научился благодаря продаже пирогов. #опыт_предпринимателей 😎 Мы в Телеграме | ВК | Дзене | Макс

custom 524267782729945034012🙏2custom 60330719314087806882🫡1

4 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC343 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @goeat_moscowVideo

Петя Мартюк вышел на новый уровень 🥧 Зачем повторяться и спускать пироги на верёвке в очередной раз, когда можно взять и запустить курьера в виде воздушного шара. Такой нишевости можно только позавидовать! Мы уже занимаем очередь…

custom 524267782729945034014custom 52377212976009124884

1 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC442 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

рандомный вопрос. а есть тут авиационные или аэрокосмические инженеры? или мб вы с такими дружите. напишите @etoyapetya плиз 🙏

custom 63254764445415524103

30 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC537 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ребята, накидайте мне в директ ваши деньги. я знаю, что вы очень талантливые! у меня появилась прикольная идея ВЫКУПИТЬ ТЕЛЕГРАМ У ДУРОВА, чтобы его больше не блокировали 🙏 🥺

custom 603307193140878068811custom 52377212976009124884custom 52426778272994503401

30 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC513 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

акции Ozon подросли после этого тиктока 💪

custom 60330719314087806886custom 52426778272994503401custom 63254764445415524101

28 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC515 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

больше всего люблю, когда большие корпорации просят наших денег, а потом засовывают рекламу в каждый пиксель своих приложений. у меня есть целых две подписки Яндекса: Плюс и 360. но я вижу рекламу В КАЖДОМ приложении. погода? реклама. карты? реклама. отдельный фетиш Яндекса на рекламу одного своего приложения В ДРУГОМ СВОЕМ ПРИЛОЖЕНИИ. при этом я перестал пользоваться картами, потому что больше не могу видеть

custom 603307193140878068813custom 52377212976009124885custom 52426778272994503405

25 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC573 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

нейрослоп? нет, спасибо. я предпочитаю натуральное. 😎

custom 52426778272994503405custom 60330719314087806884

23 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC603 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

WB разрабатывают симулятор продаж, чтобы селлеры получали деньги за товары, как если бы они реально находились на складе. какие вам еще нужны доказательства того, что мы живем в симуляции? 🤩

custom 60330719314087806886custom 52426778272994503402custom 52377212976009124881

23 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC530 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zavtrakPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 60330719314087806887custom 52426778272994503403

22 Jul 2026, 16:56 UTC627 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

первая агрессивная нейросеть вырвалась наружу. это не шутка и не прикол. вначале была новость, что в первые в истории человечества автономный ИИ-агент провел атаку без участия человека. атаковали сервис Hugging Face. агент создал около 17 тысяч событий, чтобы добраться до ядра системы. разобраться вручную в таком количестве данных было нереально. и команда кибербеза использовала китайскую нейросеть для анализа.

custom 60330719314087806889custom 52426778272994503404custom 63254764445415524103

20 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC598 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ну что, шароверы, за два часа один из вас — настоящий ФИЗИК — осознал, что Земля плоская. аккуратно с просмотром этого видео. ваш мир перевернется (прямо на СЛОНОВ). https://youtu.be/qKkRQHOnD9w 🥺

🤔3custom 60330719314087806882custom 52377212976009124881

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @petyaetoya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 114,415 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“E T Y A” (@petyaetoya), 1,044 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petyaetoya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.