Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Без базара | Кудесники

Channel

Без базара | Кудесники

@petya_urban

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

132subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700577443
TypeChannel
Username@petya_urban
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/petya_urban

Growth

132133132.57 August 2026 — 133 subscribers9 August 2026 — 133 subscribers15 August 2026 — 132 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:03132-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:16133no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:30133first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 9 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 132 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
24.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (9 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total25
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1833.3%
🙏611.1%
💔59.26%
😁59.26%
🔥47.41%
🤯47.41%
❤‍🔥35.56%
💯35.56%
😢23.70%
🤡23.70%
🌚11.85%
🕊11.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC25 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @paperpaper_ruPhoto

Ровно полвека назад надпись «Вы распинаете свободу, но душа человека не знает оков!» появилась на Петропавловской крепости 3 августа 1976 года художники Юлий Рыбаков и Олег Волков нанесли на стену Петропавловской крепости 42-метровую надпись. За надпись Волков получил семь лет лагеря, а Рыбаков — шесть. Одним из сотрудников КГБ, полвека назад проводивших обыск у Рыбакова, мог быть лейтенант Владимир Путин. История

💔5🌚1

13 Mar 2026, 07:47 UTC140 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В честь пятницы 13 выкатываю топ-5 фильмов ужасов последних лет, которые мне зашли и до сих пор вспоминаются с удовольствием. Skinamarink (2022) — экспериментальный хоррор «не для всех», где на экране ни разу не появляются люди, но происходящее все равно держит тебя в напряжении и страхе до самого конца. Он невероятно тревожный, и хотя создатели говорят, что вдохновлялись детскими кошмарами, фильм умудрился разбудит

6

26 Feb 2026, 15:12 UTC157 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тут даже комментировать нечего

🤯4🤡2

24 Feb 2026, 07:55 UTC151 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Король и Шут. Навсегда Сходили мы на днях на эту, простигосподи, панк-сказку. Я ожидал худшего: мешанины песен с плохим визуалом, созданным для того, чтобы нафармить денег. Но в итоге получилась довольно крепкая история по всем сказочным канонам с красиво переработанными песнями, интересным конфликтом и умеренным кринжом. Мне на удивление понравилось, Лине тоже. Знаю, что многим нет, но не очень понимаю почему - вро

😁54🕊1

19 Feb 2026, 10:08 UTC125 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А еще после тусы наконец выложили фотки! Лина выглядит как всегда шикарно, а у меня очень сложное лицо на квизах

🔥4❤‍🔥1

19 Feb 2026, 06:44 UTC103 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @luberdizPhoto

Я большой фанат такой фигни как выделять один объемный элемент в макете, заигрывая с восприятием. Крутить эту концепцию можно по-всякому: ставить объект отдельно, встраивать его к другим элементам, создавая еще большую глубину, или наоборот из объемной вещи делать обрамление и ставить ее в восприятии на задний план. Перед вами два примера. Концепцией они довольно похожи: спортсмены и арена, вписанная в форму. Но оди

4

16 Feb 2026, 16:18 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @luberdizPhoto

Behance - кладезь как идей, так и кринжовых решений. Гуляя по чужим работам в поисках вдохновения, я обнаружил, что некоторые паттерны кажутся ужасно устаревшими и режущими глаз, хотя макеты выстроены совершенно правильно. Сегодня выловил один из таких паттернов и постарался объяснить, что можно сделать, чтобы избежать нафталинового запаха и ощущения "я перекрасил базовый стиль Power Point".

❤‍🔥2

9 Feb 2026, 08:29 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Все, что связано с будущей экранизацией "Грозового перевала", заставляет меня страдать и временами плакать. "Мы там везде целуемся" - говорит Марго Робби и утверждает, что это смело и страстно. Хочется спросить, а в каком именно смысле смело? У нас нет сотен романтических фильмов где постоянно целуются? У нас нет вольных экранизаций классики? Меня не впечатлил каст, ужаснул трейлер, теперь пришла очередь высказыван

💯3😢2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @petya_urban. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Без базара | Кудесники” (@petya_urban), 132 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petya_urban.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.