4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,027–2,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 19:28
2,051
+12
11 Aug 2026, 02:01
2,039
+8
7 Aug 2026, 21:55
2,031
+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:18
2,030
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
62.0%
avg views ÷ 2,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
10 (23 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
12,708
Reactions total
2,230
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,230 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
895
40.1%
🔥
326
14.6%
❤🔥
299
13.4%
🥰
188
8.43%
💋
182
8.16%
🤗
133
5.96%
💘
66
2.96%
🎃
54
2.42%
🍓
41
1.84%
👏
27
1.21%
🥴
6
0.269%
⚡
4
0.179%
🌭
3
0.135%
🍌
2
0.09%
👍
2
0.09%
👻
2
0.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,230reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня за это лето произошёл очень странный гиперфикс. Я решила пересмотреть впервые спустя лет 8 всю Атаку Титанов. Конечно, это аниме куда кринжовее чем я помнила с детства и очень эджлордское(4 сезон ваще ну блин капец не знаю шо насчёт концовки сказать🥹). Вот, но словила себя на мысли что в целом лор и подача такие интересные, что прям залпом это спокойно смотрится. Я даже своего фан перса старого вспомнила и реш…
Ещё одна комишечка, мне было оч приятно над фоном работать здесь, особенно над облаками ёмаё, хоть вечность облачка буду красить 🧎🏽🧎🏽🧎🏽
#traditionalart #commission #markers
Я ещё для @kiko_market рисовала вот такую открыточку с зайчиками и зайчиками-русалками на пляже, их было очень приятно рисовать, особенно понравилось зайчиков-тюленей🧎🏽🌹🌹🌹
#traditionalart #markers
Кстати, вы на маркете так же с огромным аппетитом выкупили почти все холстики, оставив только магнитик с Крисом и значок с Фином! Это было очень приятно и я правда очень рада, что вам так нравятся мои холсты, спасибо вам огромное 🥹🥹💖💖💖
#traditionalart #Deltarune #AdventureTime
Привет мои хорошие! Денёк прошёл после маркета, была рада видеть всех, кто и пришёл, и подошёл, и пожелал всего хорошего, и надарил множество вкусных и милых подарков 🥹💖. Это было очень неожиданно и безумно приятно, я очень тронута, спасибо вам огромное за этот прекрасный маркет, правда 🤲🏽💖💖💖💖.
И покажу заодно скетч заказики, которые у меня взяли на маркете. Выражаю огромную благодарность заказчикам так же, было очен…
А вот и кастомные акриловые значки, которые у меня успели заказать до маркета ✍🏽. Такие же, но уже готовые будут на арт-маркете @kiko_market завтра на столике, которые можно будет преобрести по 400р🤲🏽.
⚠️ Я БУДУ ЗА СТОЛИКОМ НОМЕР 8 ⚠️
Такие же значки вы можете преобрести со своими персонажами или композиций на заказ от 600р за штучку! ✍🏽🌹
Если хотите преобрести значок или магнит на заказ, можете написать в лс сообщ…
А ещё очень важный апдейт, мои пупсы! В это воскресенье, 26 июля я буду на @kiko_market на Тишинкской Площади в тц Тишинка, как автор, и принесу с собой как обычно много холстов, конфеток, открыточек, значков и естественно буду рисовать скетч-заказы прямо на месте ✍🏽✍🏽✍🏽
Преобрести бесплатные билеты на Кико ещё можно вот здесь :
👉🏽 https://vk.ru/market/product/s-1200-besplatny-bilet-na-kiko-26-iyulya-222719150-138025…
❤89🥰37🔥25🥴6❤🔥3💋2🎃1💘1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @petushokpetrtgc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 473,504 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PetushokPetr / Бэт-пещера Петра(16+)💋” (@petushokpetrtgc), 2,051 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petushokpetrtgc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
