решение под ключ) https://www.mosfilm.ru/cinema/films/zolotoy-telenok/
Signed Петр Аристов

Channel
@pettr_aristov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
336subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001587562741 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pettr_aristov |
| Description | Практико-ориентированные тренинги для отделов продаж 💡 @aristov_feedback - отзывы клиентов @aristov_archive - архив тренингов, процесс работы @aristov_FAQ - как я работаю @aristov_book - библиотека для отдела продаж https://pettraristov.ru |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pettr_aristov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 336 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 336 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 July 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 233 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
решение под ключ) https://www.mosfilm.ru/cinema/films/zolotoy-telenok/
Signed Петр Аристов
Есть фильмы, которые смотрят ради сюжета, а есть фильмы, которые стоит смотреть с блокнотом. (особенно продаванам) Для меня например таким фильмом стал «Золотой теленок». Многие обращают внимание на аферы Остапа Бендера. Я пристально смотрю на его коммуникацию. Его подход - это скажем так вакцина от синдрома «быть хорошим» Он никогда не оправдывается за свои интересы.Не испытывает неловкости, когда говорит о день…
Signed Петр Аристов
вчера залил reels и меньше чем за сутки он собрал более сотни сохранений заливать сюда подобные видео идея так себе, поэтому подготовил материал в текстовом формате 👇
🔥1
Signed Петр Аристов
респектуем или критикуем, ну в общем сами решите нужна обратная связь
🔥1
Signed Петр Аристов
Есть у меня такая практика, когда клиент становится постоянным. Обратившись один раз клиент обращается повторно и порой доходит до того, чтобы мы начинаем «дружить семьями». В этом случае вопросы ко мне как эксперту возникают не совсем целевые, ну или скорее не по целевому моему профилю. Так например, клиенты из Новосибирска обратились с запросом аудита своего продающего вебинара. Моя задача: пройти вебинар как …
Signed Петр Аристов
в субботу появилось немного свободного времени, тестирую камеру и собираю сцены для горизонтальных видео и вот вопрос к вам такой если делать экспертные видео на 10-15 минут, то какая тема бы вас по-своему взбудоражила?) продажи,нлп,гипноз,провокация, внушения или взять и тайником прозвонить компании Ижевска и сделать разбор?
👍1
Signed Петр Аристов
цифровые новости текущего дня: установил бета версию iOS 27 и телефон не превратился в кирпич, ну за то превратил в кирпич свой монитор
Signed Петр Аристов
- Скажи мне три главных слова… - План продаж выполнен! = Сегодня мы завершили четырехмесячный проект с компанией «Никнейм». И, наверное, самое точное определение того, что произошло за это время, - мы действительно прожили вместе маленькую жизнь. Бывают проекты, которые ограничиваются одним выступлением или одним тренингом. Здесь все получилось иначе. За четыре месяца успеваешь увидеть, как люди работают, как реаги…
Signed Петр Аристов
Ошибка №4 из 5: оправдания вместо отработки возражений ⠀ Менеджер проговорил оффер и стоимость, клиент послушал и сказал «У ВАС ДОРОГО». Далее менеджер начал оправдываться за цену. «ну у нас же качество», «зато с гарантией» - с каждым оправданием он звучит неувереннее, а менеджеру по продажам вообще оправдываться нельзя. ⠀ Самое страшное разумеется, когда менеджер сам считает свой продукт дорогим потому что сам с…
Signed Петр Аристов
Ошибка №3 из 5: пауза после презентации ⠀ Вы озвучили свой оффер и замолчали. Ждёте реакции. В эту паузу заходит возражение или неудобный вопрос. ⠀ Допуская паузу после ответа менеджер теряет инициативу в разговоре и дальше исход событий в руках клиента - это всегда риск. Особенно в современных реалиях. ⠀ Большинство менеджеров делают паузу машинально: рассказали - выдохнули - ждут. Они так привыкли, никто никогда не…
Signed Петр Аристов
В субботу поработали с отделом продаж застройщика «Развитие». Затронули и мат.часть (куда без неё) и с более тонкими настройками поработали, например за счет чего можно занимать в переговорах главенствующую роль и в целом как сформировать образ человека к которому прислушиваются, которого слушаются и с кем соглашаются. Практиковали друг на друге весь день: участники - на тренере, тренер - на участниках. Восемь часо…
🔥2
Signed Петр Аристов
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pettr_aristov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 882,631 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аристов | Работа с возражениями” (@pettr_aristov), 336 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pettr_aristov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.