Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,384–5,598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 07:57
5,482
-33
14 Sept 2026, 14:21
5,515
-28
10 Sept 2026, 14:17
5,543
-30
5 Sept 2026, 15:36
5,573
+16
1 Sept 2026, 15:33
5,557
-2
30 Aug 2026, 01:04
5,559
+11
27 Aug 2026, 06:38
5,548
+15
24 Aug 2026, 10:04
5,533
+43
20 Aug 2026, 08:36
5,490
+15
16 Aug 2026, 22:18
5,475
-37
13 Aug 2026, 06:57
5,512
+103
10 Aug 2026, 10:52
5,409
-11
7 Aug 2026, 09:02
5,420
-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:04
5,423
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4,324 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,375
31.8%
❤
1,017
23.5%
🔥
962
22.2%
❤🔥
231
5.34%
👏
160
3.70%
🥰
134
3.10%
👌
126
2.91%
🙏
74
1.71%
🤔
43
0.994%
🤯
36
0.833%
😨
35
0.809%
😱
35
0.809%
💋
25
0.578%
💯
25
0.578%
⚡
19
0.439%
😍
18
0.416%
✍
8
0.185%
💩
1
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,324 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petrovskajaoksana. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.76%
1 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
678
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
776
over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Изменения неизбежны
Спойлер, даже, если вы к ним не готовы
Любой бизнес-процесс нуждается в владельце: человеке, который задаёт правила игры и несёт за них ответственность. Когда же правила непонятны участникам, наступает хаос.
Поэтому в начале работы стоит задавать простой, но дисциплинирующий вопрос — какую именно задачу мы решаем.
А чтобы эти вопросы не терялись, в команде полезно иметь человека, который их фикс…
Что делать, если пришла повестка? Как получить ИТ-отсрочку? Какие документы стоит подготовить заранее? И как работает бронь от мобилизации? 📕
Вместе с экспертами Selecty собрали ответы на самые важные вопросы в большом гайде — только то, что действительно нужно знать в 2026 году.
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
👉 Забирай гайд в нашем боте — @selecty_career_guide_bot
#IT #ИТ #гайд #призыв #мобилизация
Сегодня на канале о финансах рассказываю о причинах блокировки по 161-ФЗ.
Если тема интересна, заходите на канал ставьте реакции и оставляйте комментарии.
По обратной связи пойму интересны ли вам такие темы и стоит ли писать уже у себя на канале.
🎁 Розыгрыш от 5 каналов – польза
для бизнеса и маркетинга:
📌 I AM AGENCY
SMM-агентство: в канале дают применимую пользу, в работе – продажи и результаты
📌 Взлетаем!
Клуб админов в ТГ. Объясняет специфику работы с площадкой. Сегодня такие спецы на вес золота
📌 Анна Зорик
Медиастратег. Встраивает личный бренд в карьеру и бизнес как актив, который останется с вами навсегда
📌 Ольга Медведева
Юрист для бизнеса: помога…
Ваше согласие на обработку данных скорее всего недействительно. Вот почему.
1️⃣Согласие спрятано в чекбоксе Я согласен с условиями без отдельного текста про персональные данные.
2️⃣В согласии не указана цель обработки конкретно — есть общая фраза для улучшения сервиса.
3️⃣Нет информации о том, кому передаются данные (подрядчики, сервисы рассылок, CRM).
Что нужно: отдельный чекбокс, конкретная цель, список получател…
Как мы сократили время на договоры на 70% — реальный кейс.
Клиент — компания на 40 человек, юридический отдел из одного штатного юриста. Каждый договор согласовывался вручную: письма, версии в почте, правки в Word, путаница, кто что одобрил.
Что сделали:
1. Собрали 12 типовых шаблонов договоров с переменными полями вместо ручного редактирования каждого пункта.
2. Настроили маршрут согласования: кто и в каком порядк…
📚 СУББОТНИЙ КНИЖНЫЙ КЛУБ: «МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ ГЛАЗАМИ РЕСТОРАТОРА»
Вчера встретились с нашим любимым читательским клубом — обсуждали книгу Бориса Зарькова «Менеджмент глазами ресторатора».
Сегодня делюсь главным 👇
🎯 Главный вопрос вечера: творчество vs регламент
Мой ответ на дискуссию:
✅ Порядок и регламенты нужны — без них бизнес разваливается
✅ Количество творчества зависит от сферы и уровня компетенции
✅ Стиль управл…
Договор без неустойки — это не защита, а пожелание.
Часто вижу договоры на десятки страниц с подробным описанием услуг — и без единого слова о том, что будет, если подрядчик не выполнит обязательства в срок или сделает работу некачественно.
Без пункта о неустойке вы не наказываете нарушение — вы вежливо просите его не повторять.
В суде такой договор защищает в лучшем случае половину ваших интересов.
Минимум, котор…
3 ошибки, из-за которых к вам придёт выездная проверка.
1️⃣Резкий скачок вычетов по НДС без подтверждающей логики бизнеса.
2️⃣Регулярные расчёты с одним и тем же техническим контрагентом без признаков реальной деятельности.
3️⃣Зарплата сотрудников ниже среднерыночной по отрасли при стабильном росте оборота.
Каждый из этих пунктов сам по себе не гарантирует проверку. Но в совокупности — это типичный профиль компании…
Почему я выбрала путь адвоката, а не просто юриста.
14 лет назад я могла пойти в штатные юристы — стабильно, спокойно, без судов. Выбрала другое.
Адвокатский статус — это не просто строчка в дипломе. Это обязательство отвечать за каждое слово в суде, нести профессиональную ответственность и не иметь права бросить дело на середине, потому что стало сложно.
Мне важно не консультировать абстрактно, а доводить дело до…
Слили базу клиентов❓ Готовьте от 100 000 до 18 000 000 рублей.
Именно в таком диапазоне сегодня штрафуют за нарушения в обработке персональных данных. Разница — не в размере бизнеса, а в том, что у компании было на бумаге в момент проверки или утечки.
Типичная ситуация: интернет-магазин собирает имена, телефоны, адреса доставки.
Согласие на обработку — есть, но в форме, которая не выдержит проверки.
Политики обрабо…
👍93❤79❤🔥76🔥25
Signed helperLF
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @petrovskajaoksana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@petrovskajaoksana named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@iam_smmagency named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 29 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Адвокат про бизнес и ИИ| Оксана Петровская” (@petrovskajaoksana), 5,482 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petrovskajaoksana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.