Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پترونگار

Channel

پترونگار

@petronegaar

Not marked by Telegram, checked 24 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,074subscribers

-248 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247226580
TypeChannel
Username@petronegaar
Descriptionدقیق‌ترین اخبار جهان را اینجا دنبال کنید...
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/petronegaar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@petronegaar/5734 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC@mohem_mat/1378405 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC1.0010 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mohem_mat8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9912 minutesthis entry (7–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 91 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

14,07414,39614,2356 August 202612 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -248. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,026–14,444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 01:2014,074-5
10 Nov 2026, 01:5114,079-2
8 Nov 2026, 17:1614,081-2
7 Nov 2026, 08:2914,083-7
6 Nov 2026, 09:3114,090-4
5 Nov 2026, 10:3114,094-4
4 Nov 2026, 10:0614,098-4
3 Nov 2026, 12:3914,102-5
2 Nov 2026, 15:3714,107-6
1 Nov 2026, 13:0614,113-7
31 Oct 2026, 09:2814,120-2
30 Oct 2026, 12:4014,122-5
29 Oct 2026, 14:5914,127-8
28 Oct 2026, 11:5814,135-2
27 Oct 2026, 08:3614,137-8
26 Oct 2026, 10:3614,145-3
25 Oct 2026, 11:4914,148-5
24 Oct 2026, 14:2114,153-6
23 Oct 2026, 13:4914,159-1
22 Oct 2026, 16:4614,160first reading

Engagement

198 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.30%
avg views ÷ 14,074 subscribers
Avg views / post
746
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 198 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held198 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total28,344
Reactions total391
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,350
Videos
≈2,140
Links
≈22

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 141 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,004 reactions across 179 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣59129.5%
👎24912.4%
❤21310.6%
👍1879.33%
🤬1768.78%
😁1577.83%
🌭1004.99%
😐582.89%
😡572.84%
😢522.59%
🤯502.50%
👏402.00%
🤔321.60%
👌120.599%
🎉100.499%
🔥80.399%
😭70.349%
😱30.15%
🙏10.05%
🤩10.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 198 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,253 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 16:29 UTC298 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @astanqomPhoto

🔘 #پویش_ملی_برای_مادرم_زهرا سلام‌الله‌علیها 🤲🏻 انجام یک عمل نیک و خیر برای دیگران به نیابت از حضرت زهرا سلام‌الله‌علیها: شرکت در پویش با: 🔹خدمت به نیت حضرت فاطمه زهرا سلام الله علیها 🔹حضور در تجمعات بعثت مردمی و تقدیر از جان فدایان کشور 🔹برگزاری روضه و مراسم مذهبی، قرائت سوره کوثر، زیارتنامه و حدیث کساء 🔵 هدایای ارزشمند پویش : ▪️۵ کمک هزینه عتبات عالیات ▪️۸ سفر به مشهد مقدس ▪️۱۴ سفر به قم مقدس ▪️۱۸ عدد چادر متبرک …

❤7👍1🤬1

10 Nov 2026, 18:43 UTC407 views17 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

آقا رو یافتیم @petronegaar

🌭10🤣6🙏1

10 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC446 views9 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

چرا بهاره رهنما رو ریختید تو الهام حمیدی؟! @petronegaar

🤯6🤣2👎1

9 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC559 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026

الهی قمشه‌ای الان پیام داد😂😂 «یک آمیزه‌ی گروتسک و مسخ‌شده از نارسیسیسم پاتولوژیک، هِدونیسمِ مبتذلِ مصرف‌زده، بادی‌آبسشنِ هیستریک و کانسیومریسمِ افسارگسیخته؛ تجسمِ تمام‌عیارِ وولگاریته‌ی نوکیسگیِ سرمایه‌داری متأخر، همراه با توهمِ نخبه‌گراییِ خودساخته و یک اگوی هیپرتروفیک که در آینه‌ی خودشیفتگیِ خویش اسیر شده است. او نمودِ عینیِ نهایتِ ابتذالِ بورژوازیِ تازه‌به‌دوران‌رسیده است؛ یک کاریکاتورِ متحرک از فرآیندِ سلف‌آبجک…

😁9❤3👍1

9 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC512 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026

یعنی خود شادمهر عقیلی این همه گه رو با هم یه جا نمیتونه بخوره که این الان خورد!

😁6

9 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC556 views7 reactionsread 13 November 2026

خانومه چرا بلند نشد از سر میز این سایکو!

👍7

9 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,300 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

یک کثافت محض؛ استفراغ طبقه نوکیسه یک خودشیفته بارآمده از نارسیسیسم مامان جونی یک بادی آبسشن افراطی و کانسیومریستی که ددی براش کم نذاشته! این ویدئو بو میده؛ خیلی هم بو میده به اسکیزوفرنی و بایپلار هم میشه فکر کرد خلاء هویت در هم آمیخته شده با توهمِ الیتیسم @petronegaar

🤬9😁3🌭1👍1😭1

9 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC546 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

حسن یزدانی و ملکه زیبایی روسیه @petronegaar

👏6❤3🔥2🌭1👎1

7 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC≈1,100 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

رقص جذاب و سکسی دیشب در کنسرت فرزاد فرزین در تهران با شکم؛ ریش و جلیقه! فقط اون بخش شکم که بین کمربند شلوار و جلیقه افتاده بیرون! من این حجم از ریش و سبیل رو نمی‌تونم تحمل کنم تو این ۲۵ ثانیه😂 این همه احساسات رو یه جا خرج نکن لامصب @petronegaar

🤣10😁3🤔1🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 18:32 UTC702 views8 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

الهه توهم یونان باستان @petronegaar

🤣8

6 Nov 2026, 18:26 UTC689 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

شوخی عجیب با مرده شورخونه @petronegaar

🤣6👎4😐4

Showing the 12 most recent of 198 posts we hold for @petronegaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@petronegaar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دکتر ارز | آموزش و تحلیل دیفای
@drarznews · 33,616
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 3 September 2026
ایردرآپ های معتبر تلگرامی💰(درامد دلاری💵)
@air7drup · 27,598
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
المیادین - اخبار لبنان
@almayadeen_com · 53,361
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
پرسپولیسی ها
@pers_polis · 39,206
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پترونگار” (@petronegaar), 14,074 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petronegaar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.