Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Petr Lipov uncensored 🟢

Channel

Petr Lipov uncensored 🟢

@petr_lipov_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,087subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633450899
TypeChannel
Username@petr_lipov_official
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/petr_lipov_official

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0672,0962,081.57 August 2026 — 2,076 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,076 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,067 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,071 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,072 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,073 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,075 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,078 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,083 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,091 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,096 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,092 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,087 subscribers2,0877 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 40 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,063–2,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 05:382,087-5
12 Sept 2026, 06:582,092-4
8 Sept 2026, 07:412,096+5
3 Sept 2026, 09:432,091+8
30 Aug 2026, 17:242,083+5
27 Aug 2026, 11:242,078+3
24 Aug 2026, 12:422,075+2
20 Aug 2026, 10:382,073+1
17 Aug 2026, 14:552,072+1
14 Aug 2026, 03:142,071+4
10 Aug 2026, 16:532,067-9
7 Aug 2026, 19:102,076no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:012,076first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

450 reactions across 19 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13429.8%
🔥11826.2%
10423.1%
🤪245.33%
🤷‍♂143.11%
👏132.89%
🤯112.44%
😇61.33%
🥰61.33%
🤔51.11%
🆒40.889%
👀20.444%
👾20.444%
😎20.444%
🦄20.444%
🫡20.444%
👎10.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 450 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @petr_lipov_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC336 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Есть значительная разница между "обладать опытом, который заявлен в описании вакансии" и "обладать другим опытом, но колотить понты". Поверьте: - если ваше cv на 99% состоит из только вам понятных высоких словес вроде "существенное улучшение бизнес -процессов" или "осуществление функций руководства вверенным подразделением"; - если вы считаете главным аргументом короткое знакомство с сиятельными особами, включая ч

👍11🔥3😇3

Signed Petr Lipov

29 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC559 viewsread 7 August 2026

Перенимаем передовой зарубежный опыт, коллеги

Signed Petr Lipov

29 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC643 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @hrdinsightPhoto

Все врут или как кандидаты обманывают на собеседованиях в разных странах По статистики, от 60% до 80% соискателей в той или иной степени приукрашивают свои навыки, опыт или причины ухода с прошлого места. Но делают они это по-разному, в зависимости от культурного кода и местных традиций. 🇺🇸 США: «Голливудский эпик» Американская культура поощряет активную самопрезентацию, поэтому грань между «продать себя» и сов

🔥9🤷‍♂9👍5🤪4🤯4

Signed Petr Lipov

27 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC735 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На рынок внезапно начал выходить слой молодых, успешных и вполне продвинутых руководителей из госструктур. Не из условного ВК и Росатома, а прямо из ФОИВов. Вопреки стереотипам - совершенно не факт, что любого, кто выпал из госструктуры, непременно “подберут свои”. Во-первых, они могут резко перестать быть “своими”, а во-вторых, должен быть какой-то осязаемый смысл в том, чтобы инвестировать ресурсы клана в принятие

👍12🔥52👎1

Signed Petr Lipov

25 Jul 2026, 06:39 UTC741 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🔥Ну, котики, что я говорил? Даже символическое движение ключевой ставки вниз моментально тонизирует рынок. Можно заглянуть в основной канал и убедиться. А может, конечно, просто совпало (хочется верить, что нет). Может, это всё вчерашний разворот Меркурия в директное положение... Короче, если кому кажется, что в июле-августе рынок абсолютно мёртвый - то кажется напрасно. Для топ-сегмента всё работает немного иначе

14🔥9👍6

Signed Petr Lipov

21 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC890 views25 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Что должно и чего не должно заказчику кадровое агентство. На унылых (в последнее время) просторах ЛинкедИна встретил пост с таким посылом и характерными ИИ-оборотами: “Представьте разговор, в котором агентство говорит собственнику: "Вы просите нам найти директора по продажам с ростом в три раза за год. Ваше производство физически не выдержит такого роста." Это разговор, который редкое агентство готово вести потому

10👍7🔥4🥰2🦄2

Signed Petr Lipov

17 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈4,800 views22 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

(продолжение поста) - рядом с вашей функцией появляются объединённые роли и заместители с мандатом, странно пересекающимся с вашим. Дублирующая позиция в структуре - всегда неспроста. - назначения происходят, но исключительно внутренние. Что делать? Во-первых, разделить защиту роли и защиту должности. Роль защищается результатом (не всегда, но будем исходить из того, что рациональные доводы в компании работают)

8👍6🔥6👏2

Signed Petr Lipov

17 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈4,030 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Почему вам тревожно, если даже вроде бы все кипиаи закрыты на отличненько 🦄 Есть три священных топ-менеджерских амулета из акульих зубов. Это “Хороший P&L”, “Лояльность” и “Команда”. В большинстве случаев они помогают от разного рода корпоративной порчи, сглаза конкурирующих кланов, неуместных приворотов и внезапных отворотов со стороны “любимых проектов акционера” и прочей бесовщины. Однако амулеты не всесильны. Е

👍86🔥3👏2👾1

Signed Petr Lipov

14 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC767 views29 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Есть один достаточно неприятный факт, который рано или поздно становится очевиден и для кандидата, и для заказчика, и для executive search. Если упрощать и обобщать - он звучит примерно так: “ чем выше человек поднимается, тем меньше правды о себе слышит”. А откуда ей взяться-то, правде, во всей её полноте и беспристрастности? Борд видит цифры (а акционер зачастую и цифр не видит, он в космосе); команда видит настро

🔥205👏4

Signed Petr Lipov

12 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC778 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ПОЧЕМУ БОНУС ВАС НЕ РАДУЕТ да и ничто другое особо не радует, и работаете вы со странным противоречивым чувством. 👆В одной Бирюзово - Зеленой корпорации жило-было стратегически важное ДЗО, а в нем жила-была HRD. Функция у HRD работала, как онегинский Брегет. Всё тютелька в тютельку, губы в трубочку, нить в иголочку, сотрудники вышколенные, чёткие, быстрые. HRD была правой рукой ЗГД. А между прочим - могла бы и не б

17👍10🔥6

Signed Petr Lipov

10 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC741 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🐱Котики, если так вышло, что вы еще не подписаны на мой блог в LinkedIn - так надо срочно подписаться. Все лонгриды в одном месте. Аналитика, подробные гайды, притчи - вот это вот всё.

7🔥2🤷‍♂1🫡1

Signed Petr Lipov

9 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,000 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(продолжение) - Топы из металлургии \ майнинга. Тут понятно - структурный кризис, который и не думает заканчиваться. - Девелопмент \ недвижимость. Компании напоминают что-то вроде золотых клеток: в среднем здесь высокооплачиваемые топы, которые все чаще упираются в потолок доходов и которым особо некуда уходить. Рынок узкий, деньги дорогие, ипотека - всё, спрос на коммерческую недвижимость продолжает падать. Смежн

👍119🔥2🤔1

Signed Petr Lipov

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @petr_lipov_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fedoroff | Вакансии для ТОП специалистов.
@careerfedoroff · 26,415
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Work For TOP Вакансии для руководителей
@workfortop · 21,337
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Petr Lipov uncensored 🟢” (@petr_lipov_official), 2,087 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/petr_lipov_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.