Channel
@peterlevichchannel
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,243subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001022255906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @peterlevichchannel |
| Created | 27 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/peterlevichchannel |
Recorded in 2019 as “PeterLevichChannel” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,243 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 1,242 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,244 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 1,244 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (17 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,137 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Жизнь есть движение. С гор Черногории через Белград во Фрушка Гору. Здесь сегодня вечером начинаем следующую лабораторию полевой работы с будущим. Как я люблю говорить, расстановка начинается задолго до консенсусного начала. Как и любой полевой процесс - шаманская церемония, ритуал, процессуальные практики... А в нашей лаборатории будет расстановочная игра. Вот и планетарный процесс к нам стучится. В Сербии экстрем…
Posted without readable text
Собрал отзывы о регулярной практике телесно-энергетической работы с будущим. Напишу подробнее про суть этой практики. В моем понимании есть два потока энергии во времени - из прошлого в будущее и из будущего в прошлое. Сейчас напишу подробнее про поток из будущего в прошлое. Мы можем выбрать то будущее, которое хотим через себя проявить в настоящем, и оно поможет нам его проявить, из него к нам будет приходить эне…
Привет! Приглашаю в группу регулярной практики телесно-энергетической работы с будущим. Как это будет? Каждый день я буду присылать аудиогайд практики на 15-30 минут, которая включает в себя: • элементы цигун • интегральную медитацию • телесно-двигательную разминку • культивирование состояния внутренней улыбки и необусловленной радости • работа с каналом предков и соединение с их энергией • выстраивание намерения н…
Common Song Planetary future living lab: grounding, prototypes, common action Forest University, Fruska Gora, Serbia July 31 - August 3, 2026 We invite you to a three-day future living lab dedicated to acknowledging our planetary situation, exploring future scenarios and the causes that have brought us to this point, and prototyping field methods for working with processes of planetary evolution and healing. The ai…
Привет! Завершилась наша лаборатория полевой работы с будущим в горах Черногории. Был глубокий процесс узким кругом. Были орлы, летающие над нами. Была расстановочная игра, в которой Общая Песня была найдена примерно 250 тысяч лет назад. Был "вечер предков и потомков" у Огня, где мы делились историями, связывающими прошлое с будущим. Расскажу про обе прошедшие лаборатории еще подробнее позже. А пока делюсь приглашени…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @peterlevichchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 155,188 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Петр Левич | Живое Будущее” (@peterlevichchannel), 1,243 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peterlevichchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.