Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Погладь нейросеть

Channel

Погладь нейросеть

@pet_AIcat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002508302502
TypeChannel
Username@pet_AIcat
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 5 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 November 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/pet_AIcat

Growth

13513 Nov 2026, 23:47 — 135 subscribers14 Nov 2026, 00:22 — 135 subscribers13 Nov 2026, 23:4714 Nov 2026, 00:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 00:22135no change
13 Nov 2026, 23:47135first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.7%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held14 (5 July 2025 – 9 November 2026)
Views total436
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
99
Videos
6
Links
14

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 14 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7932.1%
🔥5120.7%
😁228.94%
✍187.32%
👍176.91%
🤪93.66%
👀83.25%
🥰83.25%
🦄62.44%
👏52.03%
🤩52.03%
💯31.22%
❤‍🔥20.813%
🐳20.813%
👨‍💻20.813%
😎20.813%
🤯20.813%
😭10.407%
😱10.407%
🤓10.407%
2 further kinds20.813%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC90 views19 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥8❤5👍3👨‍💻2✍1

30 Oct 2026, 08:46 UTC104 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥7✍4❤4👀3

26 Oct 2026, 09:51 UTC112 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Прошлая неделя была настолько плотной, что писать сюда я вообще не успевала. Но зато успела хорошо поработать, пока OpenAI бесконечно обновляет лимиты перед их сокращением За неделю: ✅ Подготовила к печати два довольно сложных макета, которые до этого еще и собрала в Figma ✅ Оформила три презентации ✅ Сделала плагин для экспорта презентаций из Figma. Очень нравится, как получилось и как он работает! ✅ Начала де…

❤8🔥5🤪5🤯2

20 Oct 2026, 13:46 UTC130 views20 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥9❤6💯3👀2

16 Oct 2026, 14:48 UTC115 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Кстати, если вам когда-нибудь понадобится превратить небольшую картинку в огромную, например для печати стенда, очень советую попробовать вот эту штуку 👋 Я сейчас делаю много всякого печатного, и этот апскейлер очень выручает. Он умеет сильно увеличивать разрешение изображения, при этом практически не меняя оригинал. Особенно хорошо работает псевдо-3Dшками. ➡️ А если хочется не просто увеличить изображение, но и не…

👍8❤4👀3🤓1

15 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC122 views28 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤11🦄6👏4🔥3❤‍🔥2🐳2

15 Sept 2025, 12:03 UTC386 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Лайфхак: как быстро убрать «обводку» с вырезанного изображения 🙃 Последние 2 недели много работаю и активно тестирую нашумевшую Nano Banana от Google. Очень нравится. Возможно, скоро перейду с платной подписки ChatGPT на Gemini. А пока — короткий лайфхак, чем еще может быть полезен Nano Banana. 📢 Ситуация Есть вырезанное изображение на светлом фоне. При замене фона на темный появляется заметная белая обводка — ост…

✍6❤6🔥4👍1🤩1

22 Aug 2025, 14:41 UTC360 views14 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

В Gemini от Google появилась новая забавная функция: можно сгенерировать интерактивную мини-книжку по простому текстовому промту 📚 Я попробовала — за основу взяла сюжет школьного проекта, который мой ребенок делал в третьем классе. Получилось похоже: наивно, немного криво, но трогательно. Что делает нейросеть: 🔵 придумывает сюжет на 10 страниц 🔵 пишет текст 🔵 генерирует иллюстрации 🔵 оформляет все как полноценную м…

❤6🔥3👏1🤗1🥰1😁1😱1

21 Aug 2025, 15:03 UTC246 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Рубрика «буквальный результат» Под конец рабочего дня попросила нейросеть сделать эту машинку более живой. Сказано — сделано 🙃 В общем, формулируем свои запросы четко и правильно — работает как с нейронками, так и с людьми :) У вас часто такое случается? Или вы нормальные?

😁8👍2🤩2❤1

18 Aug 2025, 12:41 UTC245 views13 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

И вдогонку к предыдущему посту: забавно видеть, как Krea сломалась на понимании концепции светофора 👐 А Ideogram — молодец, справился с первого раза. 🗒 Надо будет провести светофорный тест со всеми моими любимыми нейронками

❤7😁4😎2

18 Aug 2025, 12:40 UTC227 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Выхожу из отпуска — официально и окончательно. Возвращаюсь веселая, отдохнувшая, с новыми силами 🙃 Пока отдыхала, сделала красивую презентацию для выступления про Японию и еду. Недостающую часть визуала, как всегда, сгенерировала. ✅ Реалистичные изображения в Krea по текстовым промтам и кастомному стилю. ✅ Нарисованные картинки — в ChatGPT, в едином стиле, опираясь на готовые иллюстрации от художника. ✅ Комиксы в…

❤6🥰4🤩2

21 Jul 2025, 16:04 UTC248 views19 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

Ура, я вернулась из отпуска! Отдыхать хорошо, но работать тоже надо 👋 Пока втягиваюсь, напомню: в Krea есть отличный улучшатель изображений. А иногда даже изменятор до неузнаваемости ✨ ➡️ Улучшаем не качество, а именно само изображение Можно настроить степень детализации, глубину общих изменений, замены цвета и так далее. На средних настройках давольно часто получаются аккуратные апгрейды, что актуально для ai-ар…

❤10🔥5✍2🥰2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @pet_AIcat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Погладь нейросеть” (@pet_AIcat), 135 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pet_AIcat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.