Channel
@pessonizando
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,101subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001218955799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pessonizando |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pessonizando |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:25 | 2,101 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:16 | 2,105 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:56 | 2,112 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 2,115 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:30 | 2,118 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 2,122 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:39 | 2,126 | -5 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 2,131 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 2,130 | -2 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 2,132 | -4 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 11:01 | 2,136 | -10 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 2,146 | -9 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 2,155 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 2,159 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 2,159 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 12 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Leitura um pouco mais densa pro seu final de semana MAS ajuda a responder "A IA vai me substituir?" O artigo da Anthropic apresenta cenários sobre como uma IA cada vez mais capaz pode transformar a economia até 2030, principalmente por meio da automação de tarefas cognitivas. Para testers, isso é especialmente relevante porque muitas atividades tradicionais de QA — criação e execução de testes, regressão, geração de…
30 dias grátis de practicert pros 5 primeiros que responderem esse story https://www.instagram.com/stories/pessonizando/3978192845553420161/?r=1&utm_source=ig_story_item_share
O documento “Quality That Compounds” defende que, na era da IA, Quality Engineering deve deixar de ser uma etapa final e funcionar em paralelo ao desenvolvimento, seguindo o ciclo Design → Gate → Validate → Monitor → Improve, com feedback contínuo. Os principais problemas atuais são testes sequenciais, ferramentas fragmentadas, testes que envelhecem, baixa cobertura, auditorias manuais e o aumento de mudanças causado…
AI Loop Engineering, é uma forma de usar agentes de IA como o Claude Code não apenas para gerar código, mas para executar ciclos contínuos de feedback e melhoria: a IA observa o estado do projeto, identifica problemas, age para corrigi-los, roda testes/validações e repete até atingir critérios objetivos de conclusão. No artigo da Loiane ela propõe loops para transformar issues em especificações claras, implementar e…
❤2
Comprou o preparatório para CTFL recentemente? Checa seu email que te mandei 1 ano de assinatura de PractiCert de presente! https://www.practicert.com/pt?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=fixado Lembrando que quem é aluno CTG tbm tem acesso enquanto a assinatura estiver rolando 😁
CT-GenAI e CTAL-TAE disponíveis no beta da https://www.practicert.com/ boa tarde meus queridos! CT-GenAI e CTAL-TAE disponíveis no beta da https://www.practicert.com/ Um abraço e bons estudos
A proxima certificaçao que quero fazer é
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Dou aula há anos sobre vários tópicos, mas é na certificação que vejo mais aluno sofrer. Principalmente na CTFL. O ISTQB disponibiliza dois simulados oficiais. Apenas dois. Você faz o A, faz o B, erra, refaz. Na terceira vez você não está mais resolvendo. Está lembrando a resposta. Aí chega no exame, cai uma questão de aplicação que você nunca viu, e erra. E vejo isso acontecer com gente que estudou de verdade. Não é…
Pessoal que passou por layoff recentemente, primeiramente, sinto muitíssimo. Recebi mensagens de alguns alunos perguntando o que fazer nesse momento, então resolvi compartilhar aqui algumas dicas que podem ajudar. 1. Respire fundo e esfrie a cabeça. Eu sei que, na hora, parece que o mundo vai acabar. Já passei por isso no passado e foi péeeesssimo! Principalmente quando você depende do salário para sustentar sua fam…
❤4
Ótimo vídeo sobre as diferenças entre AI, Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Generative AI Explained https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYNweeDHiyU
❤2
E uma representaçao step by step, bem visual fantastica aqui https://ig.ft.com/generative-ai/
Boooom dia meus queridos!!! Estou produzindo o novo módulo de testes com IA / curso standalone de testes com IA e encontrei um artigo bem bacana que explica o modelo de LLMs de forma bem didatica. Como eles representam as informações e é bem interessante, especialmente pra quem nunca estudou information retrieval. Vale a leitura https://www.understandingai.org/p/large-language-models-explained-with Um abraço e óti…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pessonizando. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
A proxima certificaçao que quero fazer é
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 12 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pessonizando | Tester Global | Vinicius pessoni” (@pessonizando), 2,101 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pessonizando.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.