Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝕻𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖛𝖆

@perspect1va

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

26,611subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001857881899
TypeChannel
Username@perspect1va
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/perspect1va

Growth

26,51626,61126,563.57 August 2026 — 26,563 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,563 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,575 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,549 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,611 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,502–26,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:5626,611+24
12 Aug 2026, 00:4226,587+38
10 Aug 2026, 23:5226,549+33
10 Aug 2026, 00:4126,516-10
9 Aug 2026, 02:5126,526-49
8 Aug 2026, 01:2826,575+12
7 Aug 2026, 14:4526,563no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3926,563first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 26,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,980
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held27 (1 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total84,710
Reactions total880
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,384 reactions across 23 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
53438.6%
😭31122.5%
🔥15611.3%
😢664.77%
👍574.12%
🏆372.67%
🎉332.38%
💔181.30%
🤩141.01%
🤷‍♀141.01%
👏120.867%
🙉100.723%
🙏90.65%
❤‍🔥80.578%
🥰80.578%
👻60.434%
🗿60.434%
😍60.434%
🦄60.434%
🫡60.434%
24 further kinds674.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 23 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @perspect1va. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC≈2,460 views49 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Один розыгрыш - пять победителей! 1️⃣ Аккаунт (183 машины; 30k коинов; 50kk $) 2️⃣ Аккаунт (183 машины; 30k коинов; 50kk $) 3️⃣ Mercedes-Benz CLS63 (498hp; винил; настра; шифт) 4️⃣ Nissan 400Z (1616hp; винил; шифт) 5️⃣ Ford Mustang (879hp; винил; шифт; задний бб) 🔻Условия: подписаться на ▫️https://t.me/RUSSIA_CPM 🔴 Итоги на 1000 участников

33🏆5👍3👻3🥰3🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈3,030 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победитель: 1. . . . (@Makes4619) Проверить результаты ✅

🎉21👍3🤣3🆒32👏2🙈2

8 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC≈3,410 views41 reactions6 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁РОЗЫГРЫШ НА АККАУНТ •Все машины •50кк денег •500к коинов 🔴Итоги на 350 участников

🔥287🤩4👏1💊1

8 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC≈3,320 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победитель: 1. Влад Проверить результаты ✅

😢17😭54🌚1🤨1🥰1

8 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈3,640 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Розыгрыш BMW M8 (659hp; винил; шифт; СГУ) 🔴 Итоги на 250 участников

32🏆5🔥5🗿3🥰1🥴1

8 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈3,440 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победители: 1. А | Х (@Axma_k1) 2. ♰𝖉𝖗𝖈𝖔𝖒𝖝𝖑𝖑𝖘 (@DARK_ANGE_LL) Проверить результаты ✅

😭11🎉4🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈3,570 views41 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победитель: 1. Ариет . Проверить результаты ✅

😭37🎉2🌚1🏆1

7 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC≈3,760 views47 reactions4 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁РОЗЫГРЫШ НА АККУНТ •Все машины •50кк денег •500к коинов 🔴Итоги на 300 участников

29🔥5🤩4❤‍🔥3🙏3💔2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈4,290 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Один розыгрыш - два победителя! 1️⃣ BMW M5 F90 (1563hp; винил; настра; шифт; СГУ) 2️⃣ BMW M2 (336hp; винил; шифт; СГУ) 🔴 Итоги на 400 участников

31🔥6😨3😭2🕊1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC≈4,300 views90 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎁РОЗЫГРЫШ НА АККУНТ •Все машины •50кк денег •500к коинов 🔴Итоги на 800 участников

70🔥8🏆5😍3👀2👌1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈4,450 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Результаты конкурса: 🥳 Победитель: 1. CamberLife (@CamberLife) Проверить результаты ✅

😭50👍6👌3

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @perspect1va. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@perspect1va edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 308,721 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝕻𝖊𝖗𝖘𝖕𝖊𝖈𝖙𝖎𝖛𝖆” (@perspect1va), 26,611 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perspect1va.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.