Channel
@persianpeterson
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46,390subscribers
-152 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537025594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @persianpeterson |
| Description | بزرگترین کانال دکتر جردن پیترسون 🔻 دوره های کامل جردن پیترسون در لینک زیر: persianpeterson.com/shop پشتیبانی: @persian_peterson |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/persianpeterson |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 46,390 | -36 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 46,426 | -18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 46,444 | -18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 46,462 | -33 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 46,495 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 46,505 | -21 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 46,526 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 46,542 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:09 | 46,542 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,359 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,551 | 61.8% | |
| 👍 | 1,714 | 23.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 631 | 8.57% | |
| 🔥 | 463 | 6.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,359reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 28 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پیترسون میگه: اگر کسی حرفهایت را نمیشنود، با او صحبت نکن. اگر حرفی برای گفتن داری، کسی را پیدا کن که به تو گوش کند. از کسانی که به حرفهایت گوش نمیدهند، دوری کن. چراکه با این کار گفتههایت ارزششان را از دست میدهند. @persianpeterson
❤415👍193❤🔥29🔥29
یه فکت جالب: مثبتاندیش نبودن شما رو خوشحالتر میکنه! حالا چطور و چرا؟ اول این نقلقول پیترسون رو بخونید: قرار دادنِ "شادی" به عنوان هدف اصلی در زندگی، صرفاً کاری ناامیدکننده است. این [دنبال کردن شادی] هدفی نیست که بتواند به سرانجامِ رضایتبخشی برسد. زندگی به خودیِ خود آنقدر پیچیده هست که ما را دچار اضطراب، درد، سرخوردگی و آسیب کند؛ این یک دیدگاه بدبینانه نیست، بلکه عینِ حقیقت است... پیترسون باور داره که حقیقت و…
❤🔥255👍125❤97🔥4
خیلی افراد کمی هستن که معنای واقعی این رو درک کرده باشن 👆🏻🔥 @persianpeterson
👍347❤84🔥22❤🔥15
پدر و پسر هر دو هنرمند هم هستن 🙂🎹 @persianpeterson
❤159❤🔥24🔥12👍7
👆♦️ شاید معنای عمیقی در عمق رویاهایتان نهفته است! در این ویدیو با جهان پیچیدهی رویاها و رابطهی عمیق اونا با رفتار و روانشناسی انسانی بیشتر آشنا میشیم. جردن پیترسون تحلیل میکنه که رویاها چطور میتونن نگاهی عمیق به ذات داخلی ما داشته و برای ما راهنماییهای ارزشمندی ارائه بدن @persianpeterson
❤107👍26❤🔥14🔥7
چرا انگار در یه چرخه تکراری گیر کردید؟ 👇 گاهی اوقات، وقتی آدمها ارزش کمی برای خود قائلاند — یا شاید وقتی از پذیرش مسئولیت زندگیشان سرباز میزنند — آشنای جدیدی انتخاب میکنند که از همان نوعی است که در گذشته دردسرساز بوده است. چنین افرادی باور ندارند که لایق چیزی بهتر هستند، بنابراین به دنبال آن نمیروند. یا شاید، دردسرِ «بهتر بودن» را نمیخواهند. فروید این را «اجبار به تکرار» مینامید. او این را یک نیروی ناخودآگا…
❤180👍70❤🔥25🔥5
کپشن با شما 🙂🫶 @persianpeterson
❤196🔥63❤🔥32👍10
👆 اگه الان درگیر یه تصمیمی هستی و نمیدونی چیکار باید بکنی حتما این چیزی که پیترسون میگه رو به یاد داشته باش! @persianpeterson
❤308👍92❤🔥21🔥12
روز شلوغی داشتید احتمالا ولی یه لحظه این متن رو از پیترسون بخونید: ما شایستۀ احترام هستیم. تو شایستۀ احترام هستی. تو هم برای دیگران و هم برای خودت مهم هستی و نقشی حیاتی در سرنوشت رو به گسترش جهان بر عهده داری. از این رو، موظفی که مراقب خودت باشی. همانطور که از کسی که دوستش داری و برایش ارزش قائلی، مراقبت میکنی، به او کمک میرسانی و با او مهربانی، با خودت نیز باید همانگونه رفتار کنی. بنابراین، باید عادت کنی به گو…
❤239👍46❤🔥16🔥12
Video, posted without a caption
❤257👍38❤🔥29🔥15
چقدر پیش میاد براتون... وقتایی که میدونید باید قدمی بردارید ولی فلج میشید، میترسید و خودتون رو به چیزهای دیگه مشغول میکنید؟ 😬 یه راهکار داریم براش از پیترسون ساده، سرراست، سریع و کاملا عملی... یه چیزیه که اصلا نباید از دستش بدید ریاکشن بذارید ببینیم آمادهاید 🔥
❤312🔥135👍111❤🔥13
به زودی خبرهای خوبی از پیترسون داریم براتون... 🔥😶🌫️
❤181🔥46👍26❤🔥17
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @persianpeterson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 937,080 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جردن پیترسون فارسی” (@persianpeterson), 46,390 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/persianpeterson.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.