Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Persian hermes

Channel

Persian hermes

@persian_hermes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

56subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004330744410
TypeChannel
Username@persian_hermes
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/persian_hermes

Growth

155635.56 August 2026 — 15 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15 subscribers14 August 2026 — 56 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–62 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:4656+41
11 Aug 2026, 22:4515no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:0315first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
179.8%
avg views ÷ 56 subscribers
Avg views / post
101
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held16 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total906
Reactions total30
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2893.3%
👍13.33%
🥰13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#موقت 📅 دلیل نداشتن پست توی این چند روز اینه که دارم روز یه صفحه وب (html) کار میکنم که آموزش مارک داون هست 📚✨ که با کمک هرمس ایجنت و کلاد کد و استفاده ترکیبی از چندین مدل ساخته شده و تجربه خوبی در مورد کار با این مدل ها ایجنت ها بهم داد 🤖💻 توضیحات بیشتر به زودی ⏳ کانال تلگرام: @persian_hermes | گیت‌هاب: @zaniar-z📱🚀

3

9 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC222 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ترکیب برنده: هرمس + ناین‌روتر (9Router) 🚀 اگر توی ایران هستید و تحریم‌ها یا قطعی ارتباط دست‌وپاتون رو بسته، ترکیب هرمس (Hermes Agent) با ناین‌روتر دقیقا همون کلیدیه که نیاز دارید! 🔑 این ترکیب چطور کار میکنه؟ 🌐 ناین‌روتر (9Router): مدیریت هوشمند، سوییچینگ و دور زدن محدودیت‌ها، اتصال پایدار به مدل‌های هوش مصنوعی بدون دردسر تحریم 🤖 هرمس (Hermes Agent): ایجنت خودگردان با دسترسی کامل به ترمینال و سیستم‌عامل، حافظه ابدی

5

8 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTCviews —

Persian hermes pinned «روند ادامه کانال به این صورت خواهد بود: 🚀 بیان دلایل و ویژگی‌های کمبو کردن ناین روتر با هرمس و ویژگی‌های این حرکت. 🤝 ویدیوی آموزشی: توضیحات پایه و بیس ناین روتر. 🎥 ویدیوی آموزشی: تنظیمات و ویژگی‌های هرمس. ⚙️ ویدیوی آموزشی: اتصال ناین روتر به هرمس و اتصال…»

8 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

روند ادامه کانال به این صورت خواهد بود: 🚀 بیان دلایل و ویژگی‌های کمبو کردن ناین روتر با هرمس و ویژگی‌های این حرکت. 🤝 ویدیوی آموزشی: توضیحات پایه و بیس ناین روتر. 🎥 ویدیوی آموزشی: تنظیمات و ویژگی‌های هرمس. ⚙️ ویدیوی آموزشی: اتصال ناین روتر به هرمس و اتصال حداقل 4 پرووایدر رایگان به ناین روتر. 🌐🔗 کانال تلگرام: @persian_hermes | گیت‌هاب: @zaniar-z 📱🚀

4👍1

8 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

معرفی 9Router 🌐 ناین‌روتر (9Router) چیه؟ 🤖 ناین‌روتر مثل یه «سوئیچ هوشمند» برای مدل‌های هوش مصنوعیه. فرض کنید می‌خواهید بین مدل‌های مختلف (مثل GPT, Claude, یا مدل‌های محلی) جابه‌جا بشید، اما محدودیت‌های تحریم یا هزینه‌های API دست‌وپاتون رو بسته. چرا ناین‌روتر خوبه؟ ✨ ۱. مدیریت راحت: تمام مدل هاتون رو از یک api مدیریت می‌کنید. 🔄 ۲. دور زدن محدودیت‌ها: مسیرهای ارتباطی رو میتونید باهاش ست کنید تا بدون vpn و dns به A

4

7 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

هرمس با بقیه ایجنت‌ها فرق داره! 🤔 خیلی از ابزارها فقط «کد» می‌نویسن، اما هرمس یک دستیار هوشمندِ «خودگردان» هست که زندگی شما رو مدیریت می‌کنه. 🛠 📊 مقایسه هرمس با سایر ابزارها: 🤖 Hermes Agent • ویژگی: خودگردان و چندمنظوره • تمرکز: مدیریت کامل چرخه حیات توسعه + دسترسی به سیستم‌عامل 🤖 Claude Code • ویژگی: دستیار تخصصی کدنویسی • تمرکز: تولید کد، باگ‌زدایی و دستورات مخزن 🤖 Aider • ویژگی: برنامه‌نویسی جفتی (Pair-progra

3

7 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC75 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

معماری خودکار در هرمس (Agentic Workflows) چیست؟ 🤔🤖 بزرگ‌ترین تفاوت Hermes Agent با چت‌بات‌های معمولی، ابزارمحور بودن و چرخه خودکار کاری یا همان Agentic Workflow است. چت‌بات‌های عادی فقط به شما کد پیشنهاد می‌دهند و مسئولیت تست، اجرا و رفع باگ روی دوش خودتان است؛ اما هرمس این فرآیند را به‌صورت کاملاً مستقل و عملیاتی انجام می‌دهد. ⚙️✅ هرمس چطور یک تسک را از صفر تا صد مدیریت می‌کند؟ 🔄 ۱. تحلیل و برنامه‌ریزی: هرمس ابتد

3

6 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC138 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

✅ دانلود و نصب هرمس روی ویندوز اگر می‌خواهید هرمس رو روی سیستم شخصی داشته باشید، نصبش خیلی ساده است. هرمس پلتفرم‌های مختلفی داره، اما نسخه ویندوز با رابط گرافیکی جذاب و دسترسی کامل آماده استفاده‌ست. 📥 دانلود مستقیم نسخه gui برای ویندوز: Hermes-Setup.exe 📥 نصب سریع PowerShell: برای نصب ویندوزی روی خط فرمان PowerShell، این دستور را اجرا کنید: irm https://hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/install.ps1 | iex 🔗 لینک‌های مهم

5

6 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

هرمس (Hermes Agent) چیه؟ 🤔 هرمس فقط یه چت‌بات نیست؛ یه دستیار خودگردان برای برنامه‌نویسی و کارهای فنیه. 🛠 هرمس میتونه مستقیم وصل ‌شه به سیستم، فایل‌ها و ترمینال شما تا کارها رو براتون انجام بده. 💻 چرا هرمس خوبه؟ ✨ ۱. آزادی در انتخاب هوش مصنوعی: هرمس به شما اجازه می‌ده هر مدل (Local یا Remote) رو از طریق روترها (مثل 9Router) وصل کنید. 🌐 ۲. مموری هوشمند: حافظه‌ای داره که با گذشت زمان، سبک کدنویسی و نیازهای شما رو ی

1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @persian_hermes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 949,069 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Persian hermes” (@persian_hermes), 56 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/persian_hermes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.