Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
43 measurements spanning 94 days, net -360. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 7,543β11,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 17:17
10,119
-12
8 Nov 2026, 09:59
10,131
-9
7 Nov 2026, 01:50
10,140
-1
6 Nov 2026, 02:00
10,141
-16
5 Nov 2026, 01:31
10,157
-4
4 Nov 2026, 01:49
10,161
+1
2 Nov 2026, 22:25
10,160
-5
1 Nov 2026, 19:48
10,165
-2
31 Oct 2026, 16:17
10,167
-3
30 Oct 2026, 16:44
10,170
+2
29 Oct 2026, 14:38
10,168
+6
28 Oct 2026, 15:56
10,162
-3
27 Oct 2026, 17:04
10,165
-5
26 Oct 2026, 14:48
10,170
-6
25 Oct 2026, 11:46
10,176
-6
24 Oct 2026, 14:15
10,182
-70
23 Oct 2026, 13:46
10,252
-22
22 Oct 2026, 16:58
10,274
-24
21 Oct 2026, 13:54
10,298
+954
18 Oct 2026, 03:57
9,344
first reading
Engagement
206 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
10.9%
avg views Γ· 10,119 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.902%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 206 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
206 (6 August 2026 β 9 November 2026)
Views total
73,836
Reactions total
666
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 22:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
β6,520
Videos
β78
Links
β2,200
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
48s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
1,915 reactions across 206 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 206 of the 206 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,915 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 206 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 1 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (1.49%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
π½ +170 PIPS FROM OUR 4130 SELL!
Another nice result from todayβs Gold action, guys!
Monday has already given us some great opportunities, and the New York session is still keeping things interesting! π
πWhat a Monday for Gold, guys! π
Gold dropped below 4105, then climbed right back above it. A perfect example of why I always pay attention to what happens after a key level breaks.
A sharp move can look convincing, but if the market canβt sustain it, the next reaction may tell a completely different story.
Never underestimate a reclaim! π€
πCPI on Tuesday and PPI on Friday will be the two key events for Gold this week.
Both reports will test whether US inflation is cooling enough to change the Fedβs hawkish outlook.
My bias? USD remains favored, keeping Gold under pressure. But softer inflation could open the door for a recovery, while hotter readings may reinforce the bearish outlook.
A week where inflation could decide Goldβs next move, guys! π₯°
Pβ¦
β‘οΈRemember the 4080β4083 level I highlighted in our London update?
Gold dropped toward that area, and buyers finally stepped in!
Our VIP group caught that rebound beautifully with the daily plan π
A little patience around key levels can go a long way, guys!π€
π¬London is here, and Gold is already keeping us busy!
Short-term momentum has shifted bearish, bringing our weekly 4080β4083 level back into focus.
Can buyers defend this area, or does Gold have more room to fall?
No chasing after such a sharp drop, guys. Letβs watch the reaction! π
πGold has been busy this Monday morning, guys!
After a strong rally, price reached the 4130 area before pulling back toward 4113.
We also managed to catch a Sell from around 4130 with our VIP group as the pullback began πΈ
The intraday bullish structure is now facing its first meaningful test.
πΊGood morning, guys! Letβs catch up on whatβs happening around the markets.
β’ Middle East & Oil: Trump signaled that further strikes on Iran are unlikely if negotiations progress. Oil prices slipped, easing inflation concerns.
β’ Gold & USD: Gold jumped over 1% this morning, supported by softer oil and a slight dollar pullback. Meanwhile, expectations of another Fed rate hike remain elevated.
PEROβs take: Goldβs reβ¦
Showing the 12 most recent of 206 posts we hold for @peroinvesting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
πNova Scalper Channelβ’.π @Novascalperchannel Β· 23,642 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 70 here β alongside 69 others β read 10 September 2026
Gold Trader Alliance π @BrianTradingForex Β· 47,950 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 72 here β alongside 71 others β read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ PERO | Forex - Investing β’β (@peroinvesting), 10,119 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peroinvesting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.