Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Перманент Лайфхак

Channel

Перманент Лайфхак

@permanentmkp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,996subscribers

-186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001793533115
TypeChannel
Username@permanentmkp
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/permanentmkp

Growth

5,9966,1826,0897 August 2026 — 6,182 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,182 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,167 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,146 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,116 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,078 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,052 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,014 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,996 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 21 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,968–6,210 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:425,996-18
26 Aug 2026, 06:116,014-38
23 Aug 2026, 08:046,052-26
19 Aug 2026, 13:166,078-38
16 Aug 2026, 17:286,116-30
13 Aug 2026, 11:286,146-21
10 Aug 2026, 15:256,167-15
7 Aug 2026, 11:456,182no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:486,182first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 15s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3636.0%
🔥2828.0%
👍2121.0%
🥰44.00%
❤‍🔥33.00%
😁22.00%
🙈22.00%
🤣22.00%
😍11.00%
🤩11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
6.25%
1 of 16 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,650
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,730
over 11 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFH7Qawj111 June 202611 June 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 4 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,570 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Если не получается веерный штрих у начала брови, я показала как закрасить начало брови продуктивно не используя разворот руки🙌🏻 Взято на просторах интернета🫶 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ

3👍2🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 07:44 UTC≈2,770 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Как получить тот самый равномерный красивый пиксель…? Легко🙌🏻 Взято на просторах интернета🫶 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ

🔥1🥰1

22 Jun 2026, 08:02 UTC≈3,180 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я часто слышу от мастеров, что с лимфатичной кожей работать просто невозможно, лимфа выталкивает цвет, остаток не качественный. Да, сложно, но можно сделать так, чтобы было проще. Делюсь с вами фишкой🤫 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ

🔥2🥰1

11 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC≈2,650 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFH7QawjVideo

Когда выучил слово GIVE и теперь используешь его вообще везде 😅 🎁 Дать подарок - give 💡 Дать совет - give 🏢 Предоставить условия, эээ… тоже give? Английский в этот момент: нет, давай еще раз... Потому что: GIVE - дать что-то напрямую. PROVIDE - предоставить, обеспечить, создать условия. Маленькое слово внезапно решает, звучите вы естественно или как переводчик, который устал жить. В Anecole мы учим не просто по

2🔥1

7 Jun 2026, 06:59 UTC≈4,520 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ещё один супер-полезный лайфхак в перманенте, который реально улучшает качество работы ✨ Тренировка штриха на латексе с помощью приложения “метроном” — помогает: — не сбиваться с ритма, — держать стабильный темп, — сделать штрих чище и увереннее, — и работать одинаково ровно от процедуры к процедуре. Если ты мастер перманента и хочешь расти — обязательно сохраняй, чтобы не потерять 🤍 Взято на просторах интернета🫶

❤‍🔥3🔥1😁1

15 May 2026, 05:36 UTC≈4,370 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Все очень просто смотреть нужно не на окошко картриджа, а на срез на самом носике 😌 Если повернуть срезом к себе, то игла будет менее гибкая и работать более жестко, если повернуть срезом от себя, то игла будет более гибкая и работать мягче. ВЫВОД - на плотной и резиновой коже работаем срезом к себе, на тонкой и нормальной - срезом от себя 🤌 Это лишь маленькая деталь, отследив которую, ты приблизишься к идеальн

5👍4🔥2

8 May 2026, 13:04 UTC≈2,980 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Если градиент всё время получается “почти”, значит проблема в вас, девчонки! Это значит, где-то пока не собралась сама логика движения. Потому что мягкий переход — это не магия и не вдохновение. Это очень конкретное понимание: где добавить плотность, где отпустить руку и как сохранить внутри формы красивую глубину. Когда этот навык встаёт на место, работа сразу начинает выглядеть совсем иначе. В карусели показала

👍62🔥1

30 Apr 2026, 13:03 UTC≈3,730 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Градиент — это не сложно. Сложно — когда ты не понимаешь, что делаешь. Показала, как сделать мягкий переход без пятен и грязи. Сохраняй и делай нормально😘 Взято на просторах интернета🫶 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ

14🔥5🥰2

14 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈5,250 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Взято на просторах интернета🫶 ПОДПИСАТЬСЯ НА КАНАЛ

5🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @permanentmkp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 446,566 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Перманент Лайфхак” (@permanentmkp), 5,996 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/permanentmkp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.