Photo, posted without a caption
❤1

Channel
@periodich_akkerd_medik
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,556subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001528391404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @periodich_akkerd_medik |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/periodich_akkerd_medik |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 18,556 | -15 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 18,571 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 18,580 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 18,581 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:18 | 18,583 | -2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 18,585 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:29 | 18,589 | -24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:33 | 18,613 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 18,618 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 18,619 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 18,627 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 18,626 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 18,628 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 18,635 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 18,638 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 18,637 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 18,636 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 18,638 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 18,637 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 18,638 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (21 March 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,830 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
358 reactions across 27 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 180 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 96 | 26.8% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 6.15% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 4.75% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 4.47% | |
| 😡 | 11 | 3.07% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.40% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.838% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.559% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.559% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.559% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ ПРИ ПОДАЧЕ ПО СПЕЦИАЛЬНОСТИ «СТОМАТОЛОГИЯ И ОБЩЕЙ ПРАКТИКИ» И ПО ДОЛЖНОСТЯМ СПЕЦИАЛИСТОВ С НЕМЕДИЦИНСКИМ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕМ С 01.09.2026 ‼️В связи вступлением в силу приказа Минздрава России от 14.05.2026 № 434н, приказа Минздрава России от 14.05.2026 № 435н, приказа Минздрава России от 14.05.2026 № 436н, с 01.09.2026 и в целях недопущения несоответствий при проведении периодической аккредитации в настоящее вре…
👨🏼🔧🛠️ Сообщение от Службы технической поддержки ЕГИСЗ Уважаемые пользователи! В связи с проведением технологических работ с 21:00 (мск) 27.08.2026 до 03:00 (мск) 28.08.2026 возможны ограничения в функционировании сервисов Федерального регистра медицинских и фармацевтических работников и Федерального реестра медицинских и фармацевтических организаций. Приносим свои извинения за доставленные неудобства. Дата и время…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉2
СХЕМА ПОЛУЧЕНИЯ ВЫПИСКИ НА ПОРТАЛЕ ГОСУСЛУГ 1️⃣ Найти услугу. Тут два варианта: Первый вариант. Зайти в Личный кабинет Госуслуг, далее выбрать "Справки, выписки" ➡️ "Получение выписки о наличии в ЕГИСЗ сведений об аккредитации специалиста" и далее следовать подсказкам. 2 вариант. В поисковой строке набрать "Аккредитация", далее "Выписка из регистра медработников" , далее следовать подсказкам. 2️⃣ Заказать услугу …
❤5👍2💯1🥰1
ЗАСЕДАНИЕ ПРОШЛО. КАК УЗНАТЬ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ ПРОХОЖДЕНИЯ АККРЕДИТАЦИИ 👉В Личный кабинет медицинского работника (ЛК МР) придет уведомление "аккредитация пройдена/не пройдена". 👉 Взять выписку в ЛК МР или на портале Госуслуг. Ранее можно было найти свой СНИЛС в протоколах ЦАК, но сейчас они неинформативны т.к. большая часть цифр СНИЛС скрыта, а оставшиеся могут совпадать одновременно у нескольких лиц , и даже в пределах о…
👏1🥰1
ВЫПИСКА О ПРОХОЖДЕНИИ АККРЕДИТАЦИИ. ДЛЯ ЧЕГО НУЖНА? ✅ Данная выписка нужна: - для отдела кадров (если просят у ныне работающих) и при трудоустройстве на новое место работы (крайне желательно); - для прохождения курсов повышения квалификации; - для аттестации на квалификационную категорию. ‼️В указанных случаях Выписка предоставляется в форме документа, заверенного электронной цифровой подписью (ЭЦП), заказанной на …
❤3🎉1
💥 ОБЩИЕ СВЕДЕНИЯ О ПРОХОЖДЕНИИ АККРЕДИТАЦИИ 1️⃣ Согласно приказу 709н на проверку документов сотрудниками ФАЦ отводится до 20 рабочих дней, на проверку портфолио сотрудниками Центральной аккредитационной комиссии (региональной аккредитационной комиссии) отводится до 15 рабочих дней. 2️⃣ Результатом проверки ЦАК/РАК является прохождение/не прохождение аккредитации. 3️⃣ Согласно федеральному закону 323-ФЗ п.3.1 ч.3 …
👍2
✍️ ФУНКЦИИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО АККРЕДИТАЦИОННОГО ЦЕНТРА (ФАЦ) И ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОЙ/РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЙ АККРЕДИТАЦИОННОЙ КОМИССИИ (ЦАК/РАК) 👍ФАЦ - проводит только проверку документов. 🙏ЦАК/РАК - проводят оценку портфолио и принимают решение о прохождении или не прохождении аккредитации. Решение ЦАК/РАК фиксируется протоколом заседания. Протоколы размещаются на сайте Федерального аккредитационного центра.
❤3👍1
🔥28 июля 2026 года прошло заседание Центральной аккредитационной комиссии Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации 💥Рассмотрены документы специалистов: - с высшим медицинским образованием — 8629, - с высшим немедицинским образованием — 129, - с высшим фармацевтическим образованием — 478, - со средним фармацевтическим образованием — 968, - со средним медицинским образованием — 7069. 💯Результаты будут опубл…
❤1👏1
‼️О РАБОТЕ КОНТАКТ-ЦЕНТРА ФАЦ‼️ В связи с проведением первичной и первичной специализированной аккредитации специалистов в настоящее время кратно увеличилось количество звонков в контакт-центр Федерального аккредитационного центра с одновременным сокращением количества операторов на линии в связи с отпускным периодом и больничными листами. Данные обстоятельства могут увеличить время ожидания на линии. 💯Для уточнен…
❤12
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @periodich_akkerd_medik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Периодическая аккредитация. Медикам.👩⚕👨⚕” (@periodich_akkerd_medik), 18,556 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/periodich_akkerd_medik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.