What a ride

Channel
Peres Trades
@perestrade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
650subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001966029111 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @perestrade |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/perestrade |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 650 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 653 | -6 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 659 | -3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:55 | 662 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:15 | 667 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 676 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 679 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Waiting for a successful Bearish close
Checkout my setups for this week 👇👇 https://youtu.be/xQt3SLToBiw
Is either you have these Mistakes or your Trading Career Dies 👇👇 https://youtu.be/tCZVKU66dAc?si=mSbYgvF8UD1sAhmB
A lot of traders tends to use the Moving Average as their main trading strategy which is 💯 wrong. Here is what the moving Average was actually made for and how you can use it to get more results 👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/0lE262thUHA
If you're new to ICT, here is a complete guide for you 👇👇 https://youtu.be/KLfAkyH9dCg?si=d9MhoVOGmeBj1kEk
New video out guys 👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/bCYjwFBw8Qw
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥1
I just dropped my setup for this week guys👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/VcTuSgb2iOk
🔥1
Make sure to watch that video and engage. My next giveaway will be coming on YouTube 🤌
Thinking of buying a @BlueGuardiancom prop account? Then watch this video for all details 👇👇👇 https://youtu.be/6bWVuyacNcs
All accounts distributed from our last Giveaway are 2 steps standard challenge accounts. For those didn’t win, you can still take advantage of my promo code PT35 to get 35% on any account you buy from Blue Guardian. Link: blueguardian.com/?afmc=PT35 Instead of paying 49$ for a 5k account, you end up paying just 29$
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @perestrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@arbitragescanner_eng · 19,671
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 September 2026
@youngmoneytech · 37,667
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Peres Trades” (@perestrade), 650 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/perestrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.