Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

peremotka

@peremotka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,028subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001043078839
TypeChannel
Username@peremotka
Created17 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/peremotka

Growth

1,0281,0301,0295 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,029 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,028–1,030 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:171,028-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:531,029-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:031,030no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:041,030first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
41.0%
avg views ÷ 1,028 subscribers
Avg views / post
421
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held14 (27 March 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,264
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9954.4%
🔥2614.3%
👍1910.4%
🤯84.40%
🦄84.40%
73.85%
🎄42.20%
🆒21.10%
👾21.10%
💩21.10%
😁21.10%
😱21.10%
🤔10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC359 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Лучшему контенту — минимум просмотров. Самый популярный формат на официальном канале Criterion это «известная личность нагребает себе авоську дисков», а остальное, видимо, никто и не смотрит. Вот, например, прекрасная беседа режиссёра Ари Астера и великого автора комиксов Дэниела Клоуза. В кино Клоуз известен по удачной экранизации Ghost World от Терри Цвигоффа и менее заметным Art School Confidential и Wilson, хотя

👍64🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC332 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кевин Смит о том, кто мог (Мэл Гибсон?) и кто почти снял (Майкл Манн?что?) Good Will Hunting. https://youtube.com/shorts/LnzpvhvTwtw?is=fqttLkc-fXTCgbdi

🤯5🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC573 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если первый ролик вызывал какие-то вопросы, то на обрезках сцены с ружьем и патронами из второго трейлера все вопросы отпали. Где-то на очень дальнем фоне крадут весь кислород совсем упоротые фанаты RE. Но, слава богу, в этот раз их никто не спрашивает. https://youtu.be/9Aiv1cqmH4w?is=-TQZ6cOHGNk8hXRK

131

11 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC727 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍6🆒2👾1

10 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC≈3,900 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Оказывается, культовый режиссёр Алекс Кокс (Repo Man, Sid and Nancy) не только жив, но и на старости лет даёт фору молодым. В своем новом фильм он играет Чичикова, а экономно собранный вестерн в кадре это — о да — вольная адаптация прозы Николая Васильевича. https://youtu.be/zJ35qrFcNEY?is=o7iMFr93gNm2uiHq

🔥15

11 May 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,190 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Трейлер нового фильма с Мэттью Макконахи. Что-то из давно ушедшей эпохи McConaissance, судя по фирменному акценту, фактуре и ярким цитатам из рецензий. Кино об опасном пчеловодстве где-то в бескрайней американской глуши, пчелы у нас и так далее. Странно, что почти нигде в промо не проговаривается, что снял это Эндрю Паттерсон, автор одного из полутора реально стоящих ковид-хитов The Vast of Night. https://youtu.be/

9🤔1

1 May 2026, 03:32 UTC976 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://floodmagazine.com/221656/labyrinth-40th-anniversary-oral-history-david-bowie-jim-henson/

🔥81

27 Mar 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,160 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для тех, кто к нам недавно присоединился https://peremotka.co/people/521

16

27 Mar 2026, 18:25 UTC882 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если среди вас, дорогие подписчики, есть желающие узнать, чем жил Джай Кортни от «Отряда самоубийц» до «Военной машины», оставьте заявку на сиквел под этой записью. Потому что мы, конечно, всё смотрели, но там всё довольно безблагодатно, в отличие от первой фазы карьеры, где то Спартак, то Терминатор, и скучать реально некогда.

23

27 Mar 2026, 17:51 UTC770 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну и вот, допустим, Cold Storage, который первоначально книжка Дэвида «Парк юрского периода» Кеппа, написанная, будто забытый триллер 90-х, а теперь сценарий Кеппа и собственно триллер, как в 90-е, непритязательный, но чудесный. Звёзд с неба тут никто не хватает, но пара лузеров находит любовь и ополоумевшую грибницу, а Лиам Нисон прибывает в самый важный момент с тактической ядерной боеголовкой. Всё как в книжке, с

15🎄3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @peremotka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 402,530 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“peremotka” (@peremotka), 1,028 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/peremotka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.