15 measurements spanning 15 days, net -127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,106–11,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 08:56
11,125
-16
20 Aug 2026, 20:36
11,141
-11
19 Aug 2026, 17:14
11,152
-6
18 Aug 2026, 16:42
11,158
-3
17 Aug 2026, 19:34
11,161
-5
16 Aug 2026, 14:03
11,166
-12
14 Aug 2026, 19:46
11,178
-21
13 Aug 2026, 07:54
11,199
-14
12 Aug 2026, 07:12
11,213
-11
11 Aug 2026, 06:32
11,224
-1
10 Aug 2026, 09:30
11,225
-7
9 Aug 2026, 11:32
11,232
-8
8 Aug 2026, 13:17
11,240
-12
7 Aug 2026, 09:36
11,252
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:16
11,252
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 March 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Videos
2
Links
13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
469 reactions across 17 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
141
30.1%
👍
122
26.0%
🔥
69
14.7%
❤🔥
16
3.41%
🤮
15
3.20%
💘
13
2.77%
😢
8
1.71%
🤬
8
1.71%
🥰
8
1.71%
💋
7
1.49%
🤯
7
1.49%
🍾
6
1.28%
👏
6
1.28%
😁
6
1.28%
😱
6
1.28%
⚡
5
1.07%
🤡
5
1.07%
🎉
4
0.853%
👌
4
0.853%
👎
4
0.853%
6 further kinds
9
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 469reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2023 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ми відмовилися від старого методу генерації формул і створили новий двигун рендерингу з нуля — Formula Engine v2
🎨 Почерк, розмір та стиль формул збігаються з основним текстом.
🎲 Кожна лінія малюється з випадковим зміщенням так, ніби проведена від руки.
✨ Копіюєте текст з ChatGPT, Gemini, інших джерел? — сайт автоматично розпізнає формули та запропонує відформатувати їх в один клік.
Доступно ексклюзивно на PenWrite…
Раді представити Engine v3 — найбільше оновлення, яке ви чекали:
🔥 Quad HD (2К) Фото — якість збільшено у 2 рази! Більше чіткості, більше деталей.
🌈 Необмежені Кольори. Обирайте будь-який колір ручки, що вам подобається.
⚙️ Керуйте ефектом розмиття чорнил у Додаткових опціях.
А також безліч інших покращень "під капотом", які роблять ваші фото ще більш реалістичними
Доступно лише для користувачів нового сайту
Оновлення для всіх користувачів PenWrite.top🎉
Додаткові опції — новий інструмент для поглибленого налаштування вигляду згенерованих фото.
Наразі доступно:
— масштабування почерку
— колір та товщина контурів таблиці, вимкнення зовнішніх контурів таблиці
— текст на полях зошита
Також виправлено деякі баги (пропуск пробілів, пропуск заголовків та ін.)
Зустрічайте новий PenWrite 🎉
Спробуйте прямо зараз: penwrite.top
Ми повністю переробили рушій генерації реалістичних фото та редактор конспектів враховуючи ваші побажання та досвід отриманий при створенні класичної версії. Тепер вам доступно більше можливостей:
- Генерація до 50 сторінок за одну спробу (у класичні версії до 10 сторінок)
- Формули
- Пустий лист для друку на принтері
- Налаштування камери (орієнтація…
МініОновлення Web-версії PenWrite!
👀 Прощавай, непомітний символ!
Тепер не псуватиме ваш текст
💎 Конспектам – ідеальний вигляд!
Ми повністю переробили ядро редактора, щоб позбутися зайвого HTML-коду. Раніше, через баг, у конспектах інколи з’являлися непотрібні фрагменти HTML-коду, що псувало зовнішній вигляд конспектів. Тепер ця проблема повністю вирішена
📝 Копіювання стало ще простішим!
Форматування тексту, ско…
🎉 З радістю оголошуємо про запуск веб-версії PenWrite 🎉
Спробуйте прямо зараз:
penwrite.oas.in.ua
Якщо ви користуєтесь ботом PenWrite, то можете увійти на сайт з Telegram
Для гостей сайту перші дві спроби безплатно 😉
Технічні роботи успішно завершено ✅
Усі наші сервіси працюють у штатному режимі. Якщо у вас виникнуть питання, звертайтесь до @luxewater
Що нового?
→ Прискорено роботу у більш ніж два рази
→ Покращено захист від кібератак
Сервіси від PenWrite будуть тимчасово недоступними у зв'язку з оновленням серверної інфраструктури
Орієнтовний час: від 1 до 4 днів
Слідкуйте за новинами на цьому каналі
Тепер придбати доступ до PenWrite можна без Pro Підписки 😉
Отримайте місячний безліміт PenWrite всього лиш за 40 грн!
👍18🤬6🤡5❤2🔥2❤🔥1👎1🤮1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @penwriteofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📣 Опитування. Чи вимагають викладачі у вас наявності рукописних конспектів?
В електронному вигляді достатньо20%
Достатньо лише фото37%
Потріно здавати/показувати написані від руки конспекти35%
Не вимагають наявності будь-яких конспектів8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2023 to 19 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 130,115 of 1,581,209entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PenWrite - текст у рукописний конспект” (@penwriteofficial), 11,125 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/penwriteofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.