Channel
@pensiyablog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
429subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002657722702 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pensiyablog |
| Description | Инвестирую во всякое разное и показываю, что из этого получается. Тут будет и про крипту, и про ру акции (американские мне пока недоступны), и про бизнес и вообще про любую деятельность, которая может приносить доход. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pensiyablog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 01:22 | 429 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 00:47 | 429 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 October 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,422 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 40.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 October 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Сейчас глянул на графики, а Сбер (SBER) то у нас уперся в зону поддержки. Сомневаюсь, что он пробьёт её, поэтому продал в +8.29%. Будет варик, откуплю ниже. Так же еще продал МТС (MTSS) в +5%, т.к. сама по себе компания мне не нравится и связь у них 💩 В целом смотря сейчас на графики, всё в каком-то подвешенном состоянии, договорнячки чет сомнительно проходят, на всякий случай вышел практически из всех компашек. Ос…
Продал акции сегодня: ВТБ (VTBR) в +23.85% Полюс Золото (PLZL) в +18% (забыл скрин сделать перед продажей). ВТБ - контора 🏳️🌈 Полюс - золото чет на негативе в целом в мире, решил пока зафиксировать профит.
Дошик, это мой личный выбор! ☔️
❤5
46 центов не дошло до лимитки 😱😱😱 Это че за рофлики не смешные, надо давить ниже, ничего не знаю..
Это вот как назвать? 🐸 Цена ETH не дошла до моей лимитки буквально 16 центов и пошел разворот.. Лимитку отменяю, т.к. если этот маленький рост весь сольют, подозреваю что ниже пойдем и моя лимитка по стопу вылетит, прежде чем опять развернуться...
😢2😁1
Прикупил Яндекса (YDEX) на все свободные шекели. Яндекс упал, Яндекс куплен. Без оглядки на отчеты, новости и прочее. Буду ждать роста на +15% в идеале, дальше скорей всего продавать. Остальной рынок пока в приподнятом настроении, ничего пока не продаю, хотя посматриваю на то, что бы слить Полюс Золото (PLZL).
Отчет по ручной торговле за октябрь Деп на начало месяца = 2149.6$ Деп на конец месяца = 2686.57 За октябрь получилось заработать +536.97$, или +25% к депозиту. Первые 3 недели случалась лудка, которая завела в минус 1000$ на счету, а потом в плюс 1000$, по итогу плюс минус даже наверно заработал чуть с ней. Последнюю неделю торговал спокойно, без лудки, но с другой проблемой - видя в среднем +80% профита по сделк…
Демократы пришли к власти, и в Алабаме (откуда шутки про инцесты, а может и не шутки) выбрали представителем в палату трансгендера…. «Солнышки» моментально решили запретить технологии (АИ сектор) и рынки посыпались.
Вечно минусовая поза решила дать +21% Продал её, их облигации буду держать до погашения.
Кстати не так давно мне в комментах писали, что я зря продал эфир по 2700, потому что скоро летим на 4к 🚘 Я не злорадствую, но сегодня я откупил еще прилично ниже и теперь можно и на 4к 🤣 Но вообще я вижу так: с текущих летим к 3к по эфиру и 92-95к по битку, там жесткая эйфория и праздник. Я сливаю эфир по 3к, биток по 92к+ (кста биток тоже сегодня откупил с авг 77064), а дальше без новостей тупо вниз прямиком к 47…
❤1
Казалось бы, Бинанс взломали, кучу денег украли, в крипте паника и хаус.. А жесткие минуса у меня в итоге в Американской фонде.. Топ компаний мира по капитализации посыпались как крипто фантики после своих отчетов. При том, что отчеты по прибыли хорошие, но лудикам с Уолл Стрит мало, им нужны иксы.. А боты в крипте отлично отработали, на копирке бб можно глянуть, даже не заметил по ним каких то просадок.. Короче к…
🔥1
Тайский лудо вайбик 🍌
❤🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pensiyablog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глупый инвестор | Янис” (@pensiyablog), 429 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pensiyablog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.