Channel
@pena_bergerak
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,687subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001707522935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pena_bergerak |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pena_bergerak |
Technology β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:16 | 1,687 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 1,690 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 1,694 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,695 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,692 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 1,693 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 1,697 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,699 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:19 | 1,703 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 1,708 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 1,708 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
78 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 46 | 59.0% | |
| π₯ | 14 | 17.9% | |
| π | 8 | 10.3% | |
| β | 3 | 3.85% | |
| π© | 3 | 3.85% | |
| π | 2 | 2.56% | |
| π’ | 1 | 1.28% | |
| π€ | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AI Butuh Data, Tapi Haruskah Buku Dikorbankan? Anthropic, perusahaan di balik chatbot Claude, menjadi sorotan setelah laporan The Washington Post mengungkap proyek internal bernama Project Panama, yaitu upaya rahasia untuk memindai dan memanfaatkan jutaan buku fisik sebagai bahan pelatihan AI. Dalam laporan itu disebutkan bahwa perusahaan membeli buku dalam jumlah besar, memotong jilidnya, memindai halaman-halamannyβ¦
π1π1π₯1
Jadi, berhati-hatilah saat berkomentar di media sosial. Apa pun yang kita tulis di ruang publik dapat diakses dan dinilai oleh banyak orang. Terlebih jika kita membawa identitas profesi atau institusi tertentu, setiap komentar dapat memengaruhi persepsi publik. Karena itu, bijaklah menggunakan jempol. Jangan sampai komentar yang ditulis tanpa filter justru menjadi bumerang bagi diri sendiri maupun profesi yang kita wβ¦
π1π€1
coba bedah lewat sudut pandang komunikasi ala pena bergerak βοΈ
π2π₯1
Di tengah banyaknya berita politik dan dunia maya, kalian tau kasus ini ga sih?? Utasan Alm Yurizal yang viral dengan komentar nirempatiπ
π₯1π’1
hai hai hai kangen diskusi gaaaa
π¨ INDONESIA LAGI PANAS! 10 Isu Nasional yang Paling Disorot Pekan Ini Dalam beberapa hari terakhir, berbagai kebijakan, pergantian pejabat, hingga kasus hukum menjadi perhatian publik. Berikut 10 isu nasional yang paling banyak dibahas: 1. π¦ Gubernur BI Perry Warjiyo Mengundurkan Diri Pengunduran diri Perry Warjiyo memicu reaksi pasar. Investor menyoroti proses transisi kepemimpinan Bank Indonesia serta dampaknya tβ¦
β€5
Sticker, posted without a caption
Pantau berita terkini di @bincangpolitik
Rasan-Rasan Para penggemar rasan-rasan yang pengen bertaubat, sini..sini mendekat. Rupanya candu kenikmatan ngomongin kejelekan orang lain itu bisa diobati. Di ngaji rutinan Ahad Kliwon, kitab Mauidzatul Mukminin yang pagi ini diroisi Yai Atho', penawar racun ghibah adalah ma'jun alias campuran dari ilmu dan amal. Pertama, kita perlu tahu dan yakin bahwa ghibah itu perbuatan yang dibenci Allah. Kesadaran kalau kitβ¦
β€7
DISKUSI PUBLIC SPEAKING Malam tadi kita belajar bahwa public speaking bukan hanya tentang berbicara di depan banyak orang. Tapi lebih dari itu. Menariknya, latihan itu bisa dimulai dari hal yang sederhana. Dari ruang diskusi seperti di Telegram. Karena setiap kali kita berani bertanya, menyampaikan pendapat, atau berdiskusi, di situlah kemampuan komunikasi kita sedang bertumbuh. Jadikan aplikasi digital seperti Telβ¦
β€13
jangan malu untuk bertanya guyss, gasin ajaπββοΈ
π’ Main Telegram Bisa Melatih Public Speaking? Apakah kemampuan berbicara di depan umum hanya bisa diasah di atas panggung? π€ Ternyata, keberanian menyampaikan pendapat dapat dimulai dari ruang diskusi yang sederhana. Bersama Mas Dan, kita akan membahas bagaimana berdiskusi di Telegram dapat membantu melatih public speaking, meningkatkan rasa percaya diri, serta mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan berkomunikβ¦
π₯6β3β€2π1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pena_bergerak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ§π πππ«π ππ«ππ€β (@pena_bergerak), 1,687 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pena_bergerak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.