Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПЕЛАГЕЯ

@pelageya_of

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

17,927subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749963685
TypeChannel
Username@pelageya_of
DescriptionОфициальный Канал певицы Пелагеи (Пелагеи Сергеевны Хановой) и ее группы "ПЕЛАГЕЯ" #V8NG6
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pelageya_of

Growth

17,92717,94717,9376 August 2026 — 17,947 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,947 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,945 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,939 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,931 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,933 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,932 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,927 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,924–17,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:2717,927-5
11 Aug 2026, 19:0817,932-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:4117,933+2
8 Aug 2026, 19:2317,931-8
7 Aug 2026, 18:3417,939-6
6 Aug 2026, 17:0117,945-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:5017,947no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:4917,947first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 17,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,520
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held22 (17 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total143,350
Reactions total8,646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
424
Videos
455
Links
141

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 35s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,646 reactions across 22 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4,60253.2%
🔥1,65619.2%
🥰1,37715.9%
😍3343.86%
👍1852.14%
💔1071.24%
💯860.995%
👏850.983%
🎉610.706%
🤩520.601%
👌410.474%
🤣250.289%
😁130.15%
🏆120.139%
😱80.093%
🙏20.023%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,150 views249 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥163👍42🥰35💯6👌2🏆1

12 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈2,710 views346 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥164❤‍🔥101🥰57💔14🎉5👍4👌1

12 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,960 views410 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Начинаем новую рубрику с лучшими распевками на все случаи жизни 🥰 Девочки, берем на вооружение? 😄

❤‍🔥236🔥99🥰50💯14👍7😁3👌1

8 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC≈6,680 views422 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥263😍66🥰64👏10👍8🔥5👌4🎉2

7 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC≈5,630 views417 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥205❤‍🔥137🥰60👍9👌6

4 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC≈7,560 views398 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥248🥰76🤩38🔥18😍11👍5👌2

3 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈7,410 views387 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥240😍60🥰42🔥34👍6😁3👌2

2 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈6,510 views190 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Друзья, в Телеграм не отправляется кружок 🥺 Отправила в Макс. Переходите, пожалуйста, по ссылке https://max.ru/pelageya_of/AZ_C5bsqXH0 посмотрите, какая красота вокруг 😍

❤‍🔥128💔30🤣18👌10😱4

1 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC≈6,650 views432 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🥰195❤‍🔥151🔥61👏15👍7😍2👌1

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈6,660 views518 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Как выглядит и ощущается взаимная любовь ❤️

❤‍🔥356🔥78💯63👍10😍5👏2💔2🎉1

31 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC≈5,960 views301 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥193🥰60🔥35💔7👍3🤣2😁1

30 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈6,250 views403 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥249🥰73🔥45👏26👍6👌4

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pelageya_of. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 28,305 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q1593089 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelPelageya
DescriptionRussian singer (1986-)
YouTubeUCo1tHF76RW_MJ4Tx5NFkT2w
Official sitehttps://pelagea.ru/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЕЛАГЕЯ” (@pelageya_of), 17,927 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pelageya_of.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.